Reflective VLA: In-Context Action Consequences Make VLAs Generalize

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models can follow instructions and manipulate objects, but their performance often collapses out of distribution (OOD), when the scene, viewpoint, or object differs from training. Adapting to each new situation typically requires collecting more data and fine-tuning. We present StellaVLA, a framework that instead adapts at test time by conditioning on a single retrieved demonstration. The key idea is to move beyond imitating what an expert did and instead convey why: an automated offline pipeline converts each raw trajectory into a structured demonstration, e.g., a task plan, sub-goal descriptions, and verbalized 3D motion, at zero human-annotation cost. Provided as in-context guidance, this structured demonstration lets the policy reason about the task rather than mimic a pixel trajectory, which also makes it transferable across embodiments (real-robot, human-hand, or XR demonstrations). A parallel dual-training design internalizes this reasoning during training through a joint action-and-language objective, while inference uses the action expert alone, preserving real-time, high-frequency control with no added latency. On the VLA-Arena leaderboard(Aug 1, 2026), StellaVLA ranks first with an overall score of 0.63, versus 0.44 and 0.22 for the strong prior models ($π_{0.5}$ and LingBot-VLA), and it further leads on LIBERO with 98.8% average success rate and LIBERO-Plus with 85.1% success rate. Our real-robot benchmark demonstrates that StellaVLA can use both human/robot demos and human-to-robot (XR) demos as in-context structured demonstration to help VLA model adapt to OOD tasks.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have become the dominant recipe for generalist manipulation, yet they are almost universally trained by behavior cloning: a policy imitates expert action chunks conditioned on a static image and a fixed instruction. A natural remedy is to inject explicit reasoning through textual chain-of-thought (CoT). We show, both empirically and analytically, that free-form textual CoT degrades low-level control: the reasoning it produces is ungrounded, its latency breaks closed-loop timing, and, crucially, the reasoning and action tokens are optimized against conflicting objectives so that the policy learns to narrate rather than to act. We argue that what a VLA needs is not the ability to generate language, but the ability to consume grounded language. To this end we introduce \textbf{\ourmethod{}}, a framework that endows a VLA with language competence through (i) in-context post-training, in which perceptual evidence is injected as structured context and the model is supervised only on actions, and (ii) an agentic tool-use interface, in which the policy queries open-vocabulary detectors, monocular depth, and a vision--language model to actively acquire task-relevant information. Rather than emitting a single templated caption, our data engine produces diverse, paraphrased, and evidence-conditioned spatial descriptions, so that the policy learns to interpret language it has never seen verbatim. Across the RoboCasa-GR1, SimplerEnv, and LIBERO simulation benchmarks, together with 8 real-world robot manipulation tasks, our method consistently achieves SOTA results in both performance and efficiency when compared with CoT-based approaches under matched configurations.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies are commonly adapted to new manipulation settings through additional gradient updates, which limits rapid deployment when task-specific data or compute is scarce. We present ICI-VLA, a training and retrieval framework that equips a text-action VLM with few-shot test-time adaptation through in-context demonstrations. Unlike mainstream VLA designs based on action-specific multimodal fusion, ICI-VLA retains the native text-generation interface. ICI-VLA updates its parameters only during offline training; at inference, the policy remains fixed and conditions action generation on retrieved micro-demonstrations. The framework decomposes long trajectories into short, semantically labeled examples and trains an RD-Encoder with positives mined by Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), aligning the retrieved context with the phase and geometry of the current subtask. We further introduce Target Action Masking, a context-corruption objective designed to reduce direct action copying and increase reliance on the current observation. ICI-VLA reaches average success rates of 97.7% on LIBERO and 60.4% on RoboTwin 2.0, exceeding the highest reported baseline average on RoboTwin 2.0 by 19.3 percentage points. It also achieves 83.2% across four physical tasks. These results indicate that a fixed VLA policy can benefit from conditioning on spatiotemporally aligned demonstrations at test time.