FunPiQ: A New Benchmark for Pixel-Level Quality Assessment in Fundus Images
Authors: Pengwei Wang, José Morano, Virginia Mares, Hrvoje Bogunović
Organizations: Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria · Christian Doppler Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Retina, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Color fundus photography (CFP) is the most common ophthalmic imaging modality for large-scale screening. However, it is highly susceptible to degradations, making robust fundus image quality assessment (FIQA) crucial. The criteria for what constitutes high-quality at the image level vary across clinical tasks, making FIQA dependent on expert knowledge. This motivated the development of automated methods and datasets. While existing datasets aim to standardize image-level quality, their criteria often differ. Furthermore, image-level labels preclude the quantitative evaluation of localized degradations, which is essential for trustworthy FIQA. We argue that pixel-level FIQA based on anatomical visibility represents a more task-agnostic, explainable approach. In this work, we introduce FunPiQ, the first FIQA benchmark to provide pixel-level quality annotations. In addition, we propose EFIQA-CP, an explainable-by-design (EBD) method that uses quality pseudo-labels based on anatomical visibility to train a CNN via Non-Negative Positive-Unlabeled learning. Extensive evaluations of classification methods with post-hoc explanations, anomaly detection methods, and EBD methods demonstrate the superior performance of the last and, particularly, of EFIQA-CP.
Image quality control is vital for a wide range of downstream applications. Deep learning-based image quality assessment methods typically train classifiers on dataset-specific quality labels, inheriting two limitations: (1) generalization is tied to the labeling criteria of the training set and (2) these methods cannot provide spatial feedback on where the quality is degraded, lacking explainability. In this work, we propose EFIQA, a framework that requires no quality-related supervision and produces spatial quality maps by design. Rather than learning what is degradation" from human-annotated labels, EFIQA learns what should be there" by leveraging anatomical priors. For fundus photography, we instantiate this as a two-stage approach, by first training an unsupervised anomaly detector via masked anatomical inpainting to identify regions of missing vasculature, and then distilling this prior knowledge into a shallow adapter mapping features of a frozen foundation model to precise quality maps. External-dataset evaluation demonstrates that this label-free approach with minimal adaptation achieves better performance and explainability compared with supervised methods across benchmarks with different quality criteria, highlighting its potential for real-world applications.
Visual Question Answering (VQA) holds great promise for clinical support, particularly in ophthalmology, where retinal fundus photography is essential for diagnosis. However, ophthalmic VQA benchmarks primarily emphasize answer accuracy, neglecting the explicit visual evidence necessary for clinical interpretability. In this work, we introduce FundusGround, a new benchmark for clinically interpretable ophthalmic VQA with spatially-grounded lesion evidence. Specifically, we propose a three-stage pipeline that collects 10,719 fundus images with 15,595 image-level meticulously annotated lesions. To ensure anatomical consistency and clinical validity, all lesions are spatially localized using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid, enabling standardized mapping to nine clinically meaningful retinal regions. Built upon this structured lesion evidence, 72,706 questions are then generated spanning four formats: open-ended, closed-ended, single-choice, and multiple-choice. We further benchmark multiple general- and medical- large vision-language models using dual metrics for answer accuracy and lesion-level reasoning. The experiments demonstrate that incorporating lesion-level visual evidence consistently improves model performance and transparency, highlighting the necessity of explicit spatial grounding for reliable and explainable ophthalmic VQA.
Color fundus photography (CFP) is the mainstay of large-scale retinal screening, but its diagnostic capacity is limited by the lack of depth-resolved structure, which optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides yet is less accessible at population scale. We present EyeMVP, a cross-modal retinal foundation model that uses paired CFP--OCT pretraining to learn OCT-informed CFP representations while requiring only CFP at inference. Pretrained on 674,893 same-eye same-day CFP--OCT triples from 112,642 patients across eight hospitals, EyeMVP uses cross-modal masked reconstruction to enrich CFP features with OCT-associated supervision, and combines source-constrained cross-attention with CFP-derived structural masks to accommodate the non-aligned geometry of en-face CFP and cross-sectional OCT. Across 15 dataset-level settings spanning classification and segmentation, under both full-data and few-shot regimes, EyeMVP performs on par with or better than representative retinal foundation models, with consistent gains on macular and optic-nerve tasks; it attains AUROCs of 0.923 for macular edema and 0.867 for myopic macular schisis, two conditions poorly resolved in CFP. In an exploratory reader study, EyeMVP surpasses junior and intermediate ophthalmologists but not seniors on macular edema, while exceeding all groups on myopic macular schisis. These results indicate that cross-modal reconstruction can enrich CFP representations with OCT-associated supervision, offering a practical route to stronger CFP-based screening.