Algorithmic Foundations of Deep Learning: Complexity-Theoretic Rates and a Characterization of Universal Approximation
Authors: Anastasis Kratsios, Simone Brugiapaglia, Bum Jun Kim, Gregory Cousins, Haitz Sáez de Ocáriz Borde
Abstract
Feedforward neural network (NN) expressivity is typically studied by emulating optimal basis-expansion schemes. While powerful, this perspective is incomplete: it primarily captures complexity through regularity, and therefore does not distinguish intuitively simple and complicated objects with comparable regularity, such as the square-root function and a typical Brownian path. The guiding message is that neural networks should be viewed not only as flexible basis functions, but also as models of computation. If a function is computable by a real-valued circuit over a prescribed elementary gate language, then it can be computed to comparable accuracy by an NN with explicit depth, width, and non-zero-parameter bounds controlled by the depth, width, gate count, and gate structure. Thus, neural-network complexity is not governed by regularity alone, but also by algorithmic complexity. We then show that any definable NN model satisfying a natural parallelization condition, allowing possibly multivariate non-linearities such as attention or layer normalization, is a universal approximator if and only if it contains a non-affine nonlinearity. The scope of our theory is illustrated by deducing universal approximation guarantees for continuous functions, minimax-optimal approximation guarantees for Besov classes, logarithmic-error complexity for holomorphic functions, and by showing that NNs can emulate numerical algorithms such as Newton-Raphson root finding and power iteration without architecture-specific arguments. Its precision is illustrated by shortest-path computation on k-vertex graphs: compiling the tropical dynamic-programming circuit yields NNs with O(log(1/ε)) non-zero parameters, exponentially improving in 1/ε over the generic O(ε−ck2) Lipschitz-approximation scale, for a constant c>0.
Universal approximation theorems provide a mathematical explanation for the expressive power of neural networks. They assert that, under mild conditions on the activation function, feedforward neural networks are dense in broad function classes, such as continuous functions on compact subsets of Rd, Lp spaces, or Sobolev spaces. Over the past four decades, these qualitative universality results have evolved into a rich quantitative theory addressing approximation rates, parameter efficiency, and the role of architectural features such as depth and width. This survey presents several glimpses into this theory. We review classical density results for single-hidden-layer networks, as well as quantitative bounds that relate approximation error to network size and smoothness assumptions on target functions. Particular emphasis is placed on depth--width trade-offs and on results demonstrating that deeper architectures can achieve superior parameter efficiency for structured function classes. In addition to standard feedforward neural networks, we also review recent developments on Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks (KANs), which offer an alternative architectural paradigm and whose approximation-theoretic properties have begun to attract significant theoretical attention.
Traditional approximation theory measures convergence rates in terms of the number of parameters or degrees of freedom. However, practical computation operates under finite precision: parameters must be encoded using a finite number of bits. Therefore, approximation efficiency should be evaluated in terms of computational bit complexity, which is intrinsically connected to the metric entropy of the underlying function class. In this work, we develop a unified approximation framework based on binary encoding and metric entropy. We analyze classical methods (including polynomial approximation, sparse grids, and finite elements) as well as shallow and deep neural networks, and compare their approximation rates for function classes with comparable metric entropy. We observe that, when evaluated in terms of bits, most classical methods are in general suboptimal relative to the intrinsic limits dictated by metric entropy, while neural network methods may exhibit different behaviors. We show that when complexity is measured in bits rather than parameters, no method fundamentally exceeds the approximation order achieved by classical approaches. Our results also indicate that many seeming advantages of neural networks, including dimension-independent rates and superconvergence phenomena, stem from differences in function class complexity rather than intrinsic architectural superiority. In this sense, the traditional curse of dimensionality can be misleading; the fundamental limitation is instead a curse of bit complexity, governed by metric entropy.
Classical approximation theorems ask for a new neural network whenever the target accuracy is improved. This paper studies the opposite possibility: can the network be chosen once and for all, and can accuracy be bought only by letting it run longer? We prove that this is possible for every continuous function on [-1,1]. More precisely, each such function is uniformly approximated by the time evolution of a single ReLU recurrent neural network with fixed weights and fixed hidden dimension. The mechanism behind the construction is a new intermediate model, the Turing machine with neural units (TMNU). This model retains the algorithmic freedom needed to implement polynomial approximation schemes, while remaining rigid enough to be simulated by RNNs with explicit bounds on hidden dimension and weight magnitude. The resulting convergence rates reflect the underlying polynomial approximation rates. We complement the construction with minimax lower bounds showing that runtime is not merely a proof artifact, but an unavoidable resource in this fixed-network approximation paradigm.