Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training improves the reward alignment of flow-based generators, but often degrades perceptual quality in ways that are not captured by the reward proxy. We identify a simple structural signature of this drift: across three post-training methods (NFT, AWM, DPO), RL fine-tuning inflates the per-step velocity norm ∥vθ∥ by 5% to 15% relative to the reference. A form of norm inflation has been studied in classifier-free guidance (CFG), where rescaling the velocity back to a reference norm at inference time can mitigate the resulting artifacts. However, this inference-time correction does not transfer cleanly to RL: rescaling vθ to match ∥vref∥ at inference time neither improves reward nor fixes the quality degradation, because the inflation is co-adapted into the model weights. Furthermore, an adjoint sensitivity analysis shows that velocity magnitude rescaling carries no coherent first-order reward signal at the batch level, indicating that suppressing norm inflation is unlikely to remove a consistently reward-carrying component. Since inference-time renormalization fails while norm suppression carries no reward cost, training-time intervention is the appropriate strategy. Together, these findings motivate NormGuard, a hinge penalty that activates only when ∥vθ∥ exceeds ∥vref∥ and composes additively with any velocity-local base loss. Across two base models, three post-training methods, and two reward proxies, NormGuard consistently improves MLLM-judged image quality and forensic realism while preserving reward, with gains that amplify under few-step inference and are not explained by early stopping.
Reinforcement learning is increasingly used to align image generators with reward signals, and Flow-GRPO recently extended this paradigm to flow-matching models by treating the denoising sampler as a stochastic policy that can be optimized from reward feedback. Training in this setting is unstable in a way specific to multi-step denoising: the policy update changes systematically across denoising steps, with importance ratios drifting below one, becoming increasingly dispersed, clipping at different rates, and leaving fewer usable samples late in training. Prior work treats these effects as separate failure modes and addresses each with a hand-tuned stabilizer. We show instead that they arise from a single per-step quantity, which we call path variance. This quantity is determined exactly by the sampler's Gaussian transition kernel and can be estimated cheaply during training. This reframes instability as a resource that can be measured and budgeted rather than a collection of symptoms to repair. Our method, λ-Controlled GRPO, calibrates importance-ratio behavior from this predicted law rather than from noisy empirical statistics, and allocates gradient effort across denoising steps according to their predicted cost. The two scales governing the update are fixed by standard policy choices rather than introduced as free tuning parameters. On a text-to-image model under two reward settings, rendering difficult target text scored by optical character recognition and matching human preferences scored by a preference model, λ-Controlled GRPO improves both text accuracy and preference reward over the strongest empirical stabilizer. It also keeps late-step path variance within its intended budget, precisely where the baseline systematically overshoots. The result is a Flow-GRPO update calibrated by its own transition law rather than stabilized after instability appears.
Diffusion and flow-matching models scale because pretraining is supervised regression: a clean sample is noised analytically, and a model regresses against a closed-form target. RL post-training aligns the model with a reward. In image generation, this makes samples compose objects correctly, render text legibly, and match human preferences. Existing methods rely on costly SDE rollouts, reward gradients, or surrogate losses, sacrificing pretraining's regression structure. We show that the structure extends to RL post-training. Under KL-regularized reward maximization, the optimal generative process tilts the clean-endpoint distribution towards samples with higher reward and leaves the noising law unchanged. Combining this with the adjoint-matching optimality condition and a REINFORCE identity, we derive Reinforce Adjoint Matching (RAM): a consistency loss that corrects the pretraining target with the reward. At each step, we draw a clean endpoint from the current model, evaluate its reward, noise it as in pretraining, and regress. No SDE rollouts, backward adjoint sweeps, or reward gradients are required. Like the pretraining objective, RAM is simple and scales. On Stable Diffusion 3.5M, RAM achieves the highest reward on composability, text rendering, and human preference, reaching Flow-GRPO's peak reward in up to 50× fewer training steps.
Andreas Bergmeister, Stefanie Jegelka, Nikolas Nüsken +2
We introduce AdvantageFlow, a forward-process reinforcement learning algorithm for rectified flow models. Unlike Flow-GRPO, which optimizes the reverse process, we optimize an advantage-weighted forward-process prediction loss. This optimization problem is unstable when advantages are negative and the loss becomes non-convex. We stabilize it by rollout policy regularization, which reduces variance and arises from fitting a local reward-improving target distribution. We evaluate AdvantageFlow on image generation tasks with Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium. It outperforms both Flow-GRPO and a state-of-the-art forward-process RL baseline based on negative-aware fine-tuning.