USAD: Uncertainty-aware Statistical Adversarial Detection

Model-specific adversarial attacks have been extensively studied. We study a different failure mode: naturally occurring statistical signals in vision data that can behave like backdoor-like triggers without being maliciously inserted. We call these signals statistical adversaries. We analyse Imagenet to find patterns that are strongly linked to certain labels. We then use statistical controls to remove random correlations from our candidate signals. Finally, we demonstrate that these signals directly and predictably alter model predictions. These statistical adversaries are more targeted than generic corruptions and transfer across different model architectures. This suggests that some vulnerabilities are driven by dataset structure and distribution rather than a single model's idiosyncrasies. We conclude that ordinary datasets can contain exploitable adversarial surfaces even in the absence of poisoning, and suggest that dataset audits should treat spurious structure not only as a source of bias or interpretability failure, but also as a latent attack surface for vision models.

AI-enabled visual perception systems are increasingly deployed in intelligent transportation infrastructure and autonomous vehicle related applications. However, physically realizable adversarial appearances pose a significant reliability challenge for these safety-critical systems. Adversarial training is effective, but repeated co-occurrence between adversarial texture and positive person instances can cause detectors to treat the texture itself as evidence of object presence, forming a patch texture shortcut. The detector may then treat texture as evidence for the target, causing false detections on texture-only inputs and weakening cross attack generalisation. We propose InsCAT, an instance-level contrastive adversarial training framework that prevents detectors from using adversarial texture as an independent decision cue. SICA aligns adversarial person features with matched clean features and separates them from texture-only negatives, while ROPO and Guard maintain online attack pressure and coordinate training. We evaluate eight independently generated attack textures on rendered nuScenes, INRIAPerson, printed garments, and three detector families. InsCAT achieves an average attack AP of 82.3% on rendered nuScenes, exceeding the strongest baseline by 11.1 points.Relative to AT-Mix, texture FPR decreases from 46.9% to 7.3%. Physical tests yield an F1 score of 96.6% and an FPR of 1.8%. Consistent gains across separately trained detectors demonstrate applicability across architectures with direct inference. The findings show that robust physical detection depends on preserving target related evidence while preventing adversarial texture from becoming an independent decision cu

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown outstanding performance in visual recognition tasks within vision sensor networks; however, they are still vulnerable to adversarial manipulations and imperceptible perturbations that can lead to erroneous predictions. To address that, this paper presents AEGIS, a semantic aware and uncertainty guided adversarial detection framework designed for robust image classification in vision sensors pipelines. At its core, a SemantiGAN module functions as a multi class semantic discriminator, identifying and filtering visually inconsistent adversarial inputs before they propagate further in the pipeline. For inputs that pass this stage, a stochastic augmentation process generates test time variations, from which handcrafted instability metrics FlipScore, Prediction Inconsistency, Layerwise Cosine Similarity (early and mid layers), and Entropy are computed. These features are aggregated into a compact five dimensional vector and processed by an Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) classifier, which models output evidence using a Dirichlet distribution to yield both class predictions and calibrated uncertainty estimates. Evaluations on the Tiny ImageNet dataset across six categories clean, FGSM, PGD, patch based, functional, and geometric attacks demonstrate the effectiveness of AEGIS. The proposed framework achieves an AUROC of 92.1%, an AUPRC of 90.2%, and an accuracy of 90.7%, outperforming conventional softmax-based detectors in terms of detection performance, robustness, interpretability, and uncertainty calibration.