Gradient Smoothing: Coupling Layer-wise Updates for Improved Optimization

Fine-tuning adapts pretrained networks to new objectives. Whether the resulting depth profile of representational change reflects an intrinsic property of the model or the magnitude of gradient flow has not been tested directly. We measure this profile across 240 fine-tuning runs spanning 15 models in four architecture families (encoder and decoder transformers, a state-space model, and an RNN) at scales from 125M to 6.9B parameters. Representational change concentrates in output-proximal layers in every standard-training run except one. We apply a per-layer control that equalizes $\|ΔW\|/\|W\|$ across layers after each optimizer step. Under this control, the profile persists in some conditions and collapses in others. At 125M--350M, sequential-block architectures (BERT, OPT, GPT-2) retain the slope across tested objectives while parallel-block architectures (Pythia, CodeGen) retain it only for causal-language-modeling objectives. This architectural distinction narrows at 1.3B--1.4B, where both block types show positive equal-step slopes for CausalLM. Under standard training, profile shape is described by two additional axes: steepness tracks a training-free objective distance at initialization, and profile width is dominated by architecture. We treat the locality gradient, the depthwise slope of representational change, as a composite phenomenon whose components are scale-dependent.

Deep Transformers are composed of uniformly stacked residual blocks, yet their deepest layers often add little value. We present two efficiency methods that exploit this asymmetry. CascadeFormer tapers width with depth to match the uneven information flow across layers, achieving comparable perplexity to a uniform baseline at the same training budget while reducing latency by 8.6% and increasing throughput by 9.4%. CascadeFlow Pruning removes layers using accumulated training gradients, with no post hoc analysis. It outperforms standard heuristics on perplexity and rank-stability and stays competitive on downstream accuracy. To motivate these methods, we propose Gradient Fan-in Asymmetry (GFA) as a structural account of why deeper layers contribute less. In Pre-LayerNorm residual stacks, the gradient at a layer is the sum of an identity path and all downstream functional paths, producing a gradient fan-in that decays linearly with depth (and quadratically under deep supervision), yielding richer gradients for early layers and sparser ones for later layers. We provide correlational and interventional evidence for GFA on models trained from scratch up to 1.2B parameters. Across Transformers and ResNets, accumulated training gradients follow the theoretical fan-in and are associated with post hoc layer importance. Two interventions point to structure rather than magnitude as the bottleneck: equalizing per-layer gradient norms does not restore late-layer value, while increasing downstream path counts via parameter-shared repetition restores and elevates it. Whether gradient magnitude proxies fan-in beyond high-rank regimes, and how these dynamics behave at the 100B+ scale, remain open questions.

Looped Transformers scale sequential computation by applying a compact stack of physical blocks for multiple rounds, increasing unrolled depth without increasing stored parameters. This reuse changes the residual-scaling problem: in an untied Transformer, each residual branch receives and applies its own parameter update, whereas in a looped Transformer one shared update aggregates gradients from repeated visits and is read back by those same visits in the next linearized forward pass. We formalize this tied-depth effect through a first-order perturbation bound controlled by a visit-alignment coefficient $κ_R$. The bound recovers the DeepNorm exponent when visits decorrelate, but in the conservative aligned regime it requires the exponent to increase from $1/4$ to $1/2$ as loop count grows at fixed physical depth. The resulting method, \textbf{DeepLoop}, keeps the Post-LN DeepNorm architecture and sets $α=(2N)^{1/2}$ and $β=(8N)^{-1/2}$ for unrolled depth $N$. On GPT-style looped language models at GPT-2 small and GPT-2 medium scale, DeepLoop is neutral when no physical block is revisited and improves validation loss and downstream accuracy once recurrent depth is activated. These results show that stable recurrent depth requires residual scaling rules that account for parameter visits, not only nominal layer count.