cs.LGJun 30, 2026

SemiScope: Disentangling Classifier Tuning and Joint Optimization in Semi-Supervised Security Classification

Authors: Rui Shu, Tianpei Xia, Jingzhu He

Organizations: North Carolina State University · ShanghaiTech University

Abstract

Background. Labeled data for security classification is scarce. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) propagates labels from a small labeled pool to larger unlabeled pools. Yet security applications often use SSL as a black box: default parameters, a fixed classifier, and no handling of pseudo-label-induced class imbalance. Aims. Recent work reports sizeable gains from optimizing SSL pipelines via joint search, AutoML, or per-component tuning. These gains are hard to attribute: they may reflect useful SSL-classifier interactions, or mostly from simply tuning the downstream classifier. We disentangle these effects for binary tabular security data with classical SSL and tree-based classifiers. Method. We build SemiScope as an analysis instrument, not a deployment recommendation. It uses Bayesian Optimization to jointly tune SSL settings, confidence filtering, oversampling, and the classifier. The key control, Tuned-Clf, fixes SSL to defaults but gets the same 100-trial classifier budget and validation-set threshold tuning as SemiScope. At 10% labels, we compare them with paired TOST using a +/-1.0 g-measure smallest effect of interest. Results. SemiScope beats every default SSL baseline on all five datasets, improving over the strongest by 0.7-12.7 points. Under the equal-budget control, Tuned-Clf is statistically equivalent to the full pipeline on 4 of 5 datasets; Phishing is inconclusive. Classifier HPO alone recovers a median 86% of SemiScope's gain over Default Self-Training (ST) + Random Forest (RF). Conclusions. The reusable contribution is the decomposition protocol. A simpler recipe suffices: use Self-Training, tune the classifier with Bayesian Optimization, and tune the decision threshold on validation data. It reaches within 1 g-measure of Supervised RF at 20-30% labels on four datasets and 40% on Drebin, at the same or lower label rate than Default ST + RF on every dataset.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jul 17, 2026stat.ML

MTSSL: Meta-Thresholding Semi-Supervised Learning

A large body of Semi-supervised Learning~(SSL) algorithms encounter the threshold ττ to select pseudo-labels. The value of ττ across different SSL algorithms can vary depending on the learning perspective, yet they may achieve similar performance. It motivates us to establish a unified theoretical framework to explain the role of ττ in SSL. We statistically explained that the unsupervised loss is affected independently by correct and incorrect pseudo-labels, while ττ adjusts their numbers to balance the corresponding error term. This inherent trade-off indicates that SSL can reach the same loss with varying ττ, precise optimal values of ττ during training may be unnecessary. With this, we treat ττ as an updatable parameter and optimize it via differentiation; the new policy is named \textbf{Meta-Thresholding Semi-Supervised Learning (MTSSL)}. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superior performance of MTSSL. We observe that the accuracy curves of SSL algorithms can overlap completely even when the values of ττ differ significantly, which supports our theoretical framework and indicates that the selection of ττ can be relaxed in the future design of SSL algorithms.
Shuyang Liu, Ziang Zeng, Ruiqiu Zheng +4
Semi-Supervised LearningHyperparameter Optimization
AskPDF
Apr 30, 2026cs.CV

SECOS: Semantic Capture for Rigorous Classification in Open-World Semi-Supervised Learning

In open-world semi-supervised learning (OWSSL), a model learns from labeled data and unlabeled data containing both known and novel classes. In practical OWSSL applications, models are expected to perform rigorous classification by directly selecting the most semantically relevant label from a candidate set for each sample. Existing OWSSL methods fail to achieve this because novel samples are trained without explicit supervision, and these methods lack mechanisms to extract latent semantic information, resulting in predicted labels that have no semantic correspondence to candidate textual labels. To address this, we introduce SEmantic Capture for Open-world Semi-supervised learning (SECOS), which directly predicts textual labels from the candidate set without post-processing, meeting the requirements of practical OWSSL applications. SECOS leverages external knowledge to extract and align semantic representations across modalities for both known and novel classes, providing explicit supervisory signals for training novel classes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that even when existing OWSSL methods are evaluated under the more lenient post-hoc matching setting, SECOS still surpasses them by up to 5.4% without such assistance, highlighting its superior effectiveness. Code is available at https://github.com/ganchi-huanggua/OSSL-Classification.
Hezhao Liu, Jiacheng Yang, Junlong Gao +4
Semi-Supervised LearningDense Semantic Segmentation
AskPDF
Jul 14, 2026cs.CV

Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learning: Pretrain-Finetuning or Joint Training?

Self-supervision is a powerful technique for learning visual representations from unlabeled data. Existing techniques primarily adopt a two-stage approach for self-supervised learning (SSL): a pretraining stage on unlabeled data followed by a finetuning stage on labeled data. While this pipeline has demonstrated extreme effectiveness, the interaction between self-supervised and supervised learning objectives remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we systematically investigate whether jointly optimizing the self-supervised and supervised objectives during training provides a better alternative. We compare two training paradigms: (1) the aforementioned pretraining followed by finetuning (PFT) and (2) joint training (JT), where self-supervised and supervised losses are optimized simultaneously in the same network. Across eight representative SSL methods and diverse computer vision tasks on natural, medical, crisis response, and remote sensing data, we evaluate performance under varying percentages of labeled data. Our results reveal that the relative effectiveness of PFT and JT depends strongly on the task at hand, the availability of labeled data, and the complexity of the domain. We find that JT consistently improves data and training efficiency while being robust in low-label settings, while PFT is more reliable in more specialized domains. We further analyze representation quality, robustness, and cross-domain generalization, providing new insights into how self-supervised and supervised objectives interact during optimization. We establish a comprehensive empirical benchmark for hybrid SSL-based semi-supervised learning and offer practical guidance for selecting appropriate training strategies across diverse vision applications.
Nusrat Munia, Tyler Ward, Nishat Nayla +2
Self-SupervisedSelf-Supervised RepresentationsPhotometric SupervisionComputer VisionVisual RepresentationsCross-Domain Generalization
AskPDF