Embedding Inference Attack

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) systems, such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), to incorporate domain-specific knowledge without costly re-training. These systems often store pre-computed document embeddings in cloud-based vector databases. However, such embeddings are vulnerable to embedding inversion attacks (EIAs), which can reconstruct their underlying text. Existing defenses, such as adding noise or scaling embeddings, often provide limited privacy or significantly reduce retrieval utility. We propose SHAQ (shadow query generation), a semantic-decomposition and embedding-decoupling defense against EIAs. SHAQ is based on the insight that EIAs rely on the strong coupling between an embedding and its original text. Instead of storing document embeddings directly, SHAQ uses a generative language model to create diverse shadow queries that capture different semantic aspects of each document. These queries are then encoded and stored in place of the original document embeddings, thereby decomposing document semantics and decoupling stored embeddings from the source text. Experiments across diverse IR datasets show that SHAQ substantially improves privacy while preserving retrieval utility, achieving a recovery rate as low as 0.2104, defending up to 19.50% more tokens than baseline defenses, and reaching up to 0.7967 MAP@10 with up to 5.53% utility improvement. These results demonstrate that semantic decomposition and embedding decoupling provide an effective alternative to directly modifying embeddings for defending against EIAs.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) equips large language models (LLMs) with external evidence by retrieving documents at inference time, but it also turns the retrieval corpusinto a sensitive asset. Under a black-box setting, an adversary given a candidate document can infer whether it has been ingested into the RAG knowledge base (i.e., document-level membership inference) solely from query response interactions, thereby leaking corpus coverage and the existence of sensitive topics. Existing RAG MIA methods either rely on soft signals such as semantic similarity, which often yield overlapping member/non-member score distributions and unstable thresholds, or employ explicit confirmation probes whose intent is conspicuous and thus prone to refusal and detection. We propose E-MIA, which converts verifiable hard evidence in the target document (e.g., fine-grained details, proper nouns/technical terms, definitional statements, metadata cues, and causal/constraint relations) into an exam with four objectively gradable question types (FB/SC/MC/T/F), and uses the aggregated exam score across multiple evidence targeted questions as the membership signal. Experiments across multiple datasets and diverse RAG configurations demonstrate that E-MIA improves member/non-member separability in stringent settings while preserving natural, stealthy queries, and we further analyze the impact of question composition and exam length on attack effectiveness.

Injecting malicious knowledge into retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems can manipulate retrieved evidence and mislead downstream generation, posing a serious security threat for AI applications. Existing RAG injection attacks mainly rely on manipulating external knowledge bases, such as crafting malicious corpus. However, the synthetic text crafted by such data-centric methods could be detectable, leading to the failure of attacks. Beyond corpus manipulation, open-source retrievers are increasingly exposing RAG systems to model-centric attacks. In this paper, we propose conflict-aware retriever editing, i.e., CAREATTACK, a model-centric retriever attack framework for malicious knowledge injection in RAG. Specifically, CAREATTACK consists two stages of conflict-aware retriever editing and attack-preserving anchor repair. Conflict-aware retriever editing adapts efficient closed-form parameter editing to the dense retrieval model, promoting malicious knowledge above benign competing passages and resolving potential parameter conflicts through graph-based conflict detection and parameter editing projection. Then, attack-preserving anchor repair performs lightweight calibration on the edited retriever to further eliminate the impact on non-target prompts while preserving the attack effectiveness for target prompts. We instantiate CAREATTACK on Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B and BGE-M3, and conduct evaluation on three benchmark datasets. Experimental results demonstrate our method substantially promote malicious passages into the retrieved knowledge of RAG systems and can perform attacks for batches of target prompts and passages, given the access of retrieval model parameters. Since most RAG systems are built upon open-source retrieval models, this work reveals a practical attack surface in RAG systems. Codes are public accessible at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CareAttack-3F1C.