cs.AIJul 1, 2026

Auto-FL-Research: Agentic Search for Federated Learning Algorithms

Authors: Holger R. Roth, Ziyue Xu, Chester Chen, Daguang Xu, Peter Cnudde, Andrew Feng

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) research often depends on many small but consequential algorithmic choices: optimizer variants, server aggregation rules, local training schedules, normalization, regularization, and model architecture. These choices are expensive to explore manually and difficult to compare fairly when candidate changes can also alter the FL training or evaluation path. In this work, we present Auto-FL-Research (AFR), a constrained coding-agent workflow for FL algorithmic recipe search. Agents may propose and implement candidate training algorithms, including server aggregation rules, client update schedules, local objectives, and registered model variants, while task profiles fix the mutation surface, compute budget, communication contract, and final model evaluation. Each campaign records candidate scores, runtime, edited files, artifacts, and failure status. We evaluate AFR on five healthcare cross-silo FLamby tasks and on grouped-client profiles for the five fixed LEAF datasets plus the LEAF synthetic task. Five-seed repeat evaluations support gains on four FLamby tasks and five of six LEAF profiles, while also exposing seed-sensitive and search-selected failure cases. Same-budget controls show that several gains correspond to FL-recipe changes, whereas other improvements are recovered by fixed-surface scalar controls or fail under repeat or held-out evaluation. These mixed outcomes are part of the contribution: they show how agent-generated candidates can be separated into repeated FL mechanisms, fixed-surface tuning effects, and selected single-run artifacts.

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 8, 2026cs.LG

FLAM: Evaluating Model Performance with Aggregatable Measures in Federated Learning

Performance evaluation is essential for assessing the quality of machine learning (ML) models and guiding deployment decisions. In federated learning (FL), assessing the performance is challenging because data are distributed across participants. Consequently, the coordinator must rely on locally computed evaluation metrics and aggregate them to assess the global model. A key challenge is that common aggregation strategies, such as weighted averaging based on the local samples per participant, do not always produce the same results as centralized evaluation. Existing definitions of performance evaluation are largely tailored to accuracy and do not generalize to other metrics, leading to inconsistencies between participant-based and centralized evaluation. However, such discrepancies are inconsistent with the FL objective and lead to a wrong calculation of the metric. To address this issue, we examine the underlying reasons for these discrepancies and propose FLAM, a performance evaluation method based on aggregatable measures that yields the same results as centralized evaluation without the need for a global test dataset.
Fabian Stricker, Jose A. Peregrina, David Bermbach +1
Model EvaluationFairness-Aware LearningMachine LearningBenchmark Datasets
AskPDF
May 6, 2026cs.LG

Knowledge-Free Correlated Agreement for Incentivizing Federated Learning

We introduce Knowledge-Free Correlated Agreement (KFCA) to reward client contributions in federated learning (FL) without relying on ground truth, a public test set, or distribution knowledge. Under categorical reports and an honest majority, KFCA is strictly truthful, addressing the label-flipping vulnerability of Correlated Agreement (CA). We evaluate KFCA on federated LLM adapter tuning and a real-world PCB inspection task, showing efficient real-time reward computation suitable for decentralized and blockchain-based incentive designs.
Leon Witt, Togrul Abbasli, Kentaroh Toyoda +2
Fairness-Aware LearningIncentivesBlockchain
AskPDF
May 20, 2026cs.LG

CRAFT: Conflict-Resolved Aggregation for Federated Training

The aggregation of conflicting client updates remains a fundamental bottleneck in federated learning (FL) under heterogeneous data distributions. Naive averaging can produce a global update that improves the global objective while conflicting with specific clients, causing degradation for those clients. In this work, we propose CRAFT (Conflict-Resolved Aggregation for Federated Training), a new aggregation framework that treats the global update as a geometric correction problem. We formulate aggregation as finding the update closest to a reference direction while satisfying conflict-free alignment constraints. We derive a closed-form expression for the constrained optimization problem, avoiding the computational overhead of iterative solvers. Furthermore, we use a layer-wise adaptation to address conflicts at varying feature granularities. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that CRAFT promotes a common-descent structure and mitigates conflicts through its projection geometry. Extensive experiments on heterogeneous benchmarks demonstrate that CRAFT improves the accuracy of the global model while reducing performance disparity across clients compared with state-of-the-art baselines. The source code for CRAFT is available at https://github.com/tum-pbs/CRAFT.
Ziqi Wang, Qiang Liu, Nils Thuerey
Distributional LearningAdversarial TransferabilityKnowledge Conflicts
AskPDF