From Forgeries to Foundation Models: A Systematic Survey of Identity Document Attack and Detection

Identity document (ID) authentication relies on the structural integrity of complex, high-frequency security patterns. However, advanced Generative AI models can now inject localized, high-fidelity manipulations, creating deceptive attacks that bypass standard verification. Training robust image forensic models to detect these anomalies is hindered by privacy regulations, forcing reliance on synthetic templates lacking the intricate visual patterns of real IDs. To bridge this domain gap, we introduce FakeIDet3-DB, the first comprehensive database of digital manipulations on real, government-issued IDs. FakeIDet3-DB encompasses classical (e.g., copy-move) and Generative AI-driven manipulations (e.g., face-swapping, inpainting) enhanced with advanced image refinement procedures to suppress visual artifacts. In addition, to comply with strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR), we adopt a recently-proposed framework based on patches. In order to maximize forensic utility, we formulate privacy-aware patch extraction from a real ID as a geometrically constrained image processing problem. We propose PACE, a Pseudo-Anonymized Contextual patch Extraction algorithm, which leverages Integral Image mapping and distance-driven Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS). PACE efficiently contours anonymization masks that prevent Personally Identifiable Information (PII) leakage while maximizing semantic density in peri-censorship regions, yielding almost 5.2M patches extracted from more than 6.4K images from real/fake IDs. Furthermore, an extensive evaluation of the proposed FakeIDet3-DB is performed using state-of-the-art models, showcasing they all struggle to detect and locate attacks coming from generative and classic techniques (32.45% EER in detection and 83.48% AUC-ROC in localization).

As services move online, trust institutions such as banks, lenders, and governments must verify the identity of remote users. Fraud detection tools are widely available, but evaluating and fine-tuning them remains difficult because identity documents are sensitive and therefore scarce. Synthetic data generation offers a path forward, and demand is clear: our prior work in this area has been downloaded over $11{,}000$ times (aggregated from eight parts). We introduce IDSpace, extending this line of research in three directions. First, we propose model-guided Bayesian optimization, which tunes generation parameters to maximize both visual similarity and prediction consistency with target-domain models given only a few samples from a target domain. Second, we decouple user-specified metadata (demographics, fraud patterns, capture device) from automatically tuned control parameters (font styles, noise levels, image quality), allowing users to configure evaluations without low-level expertise. Third, we expand beyond template images to support scanned and mobile-captured documents. Experiments show IDSpace improves evaluation consistency by $15-45\%$ over baselines including CycleGAN, diffusion inpainting, and non-guided optimization, using only a few real samples, while improving training accuracy by up to $9\%$ and SSIM similarity with the target domain by $10\%$. We also released a new dataset consisting of $359{,}240$ high-quality synthetic documents across ten European ID types.

Digital identity verification systems used in remote onboarding rely on document images to authenticate users, making them vulnerable to localized manipulations of key identity fields such as facial photographs and textual information. Existing forgery detection methods, developed primarily for natural-image forensics, show limited transferability to structured identity documents. We propose FLiD, a lightweight field-localized framework that targets critical identity regions rather than processing full-document images. A fine-tuned object detector first localizes face and text fields; a frozen MobileNetV3-Small backbone then extracts compact field-level embeddings, which are classified by lightweight neural network with only 191K trainable parameters. FLiD achieves AUC scores of 0.880 (face), 0.954 (text), and 0.923 (both-field attacks), with corresponding EERs of 18.05%, 11.61%, and 15.16%, representing absolute reductions of 29-35 percentage points over a full-document baseline trained from scratch. FLiD also consistently outperforms general-purpose manipulation detectors (TruFor, MMFusion, UniVAD) across all attack scenarios while requiring 13x fewer parameters and 21x fewer FLOPs