Probabilistic Low-Voltage Peak Load Forecasting with Time Series Foundation Models Evaluated on Application-Oriented Metrics

For distribution system operators, short-term load forecasting (STLF) supports congestion management, voltage control, and asset protection. Most existing approaches focus on overall accuracy across all time steps and neglect performance during high-demand (HD) periods, where larger forecast errors can increase the risk of congestion and voltage violations. In this paper, we study peak-aware STLF across three operator-relevant distribution grid aggregation levels, area codes (AC), secondary substations (SUB), and low-voltage (LV) feeders, using open datasets from the United Kingdom and Switzerland. We compare statistical baselines, machine learning models (LightGBM and XGBoost), and recent time-series foundation models (Chronos Bolt and Chronos-2) under a peak-aware evaluation framework that reports both overall and HD forecasting performance using NMAE and MAPE. The results show that Chronos-2 achieves the best HD performance across all aggregation levels, with HD-NMAE and HD-MAPE of 0.039 and 4.53% at AC, 0.080 and 9.45% at SUB, and 0.138 and 16.14% at LV, while Chronos-Bolt consistently ranks second best. Compared with the gradient boosted ML models, Chronos-2 reduces mean HD-NMAE by about 20-51% across levels while remaining best or near-best on the overall metrics. A quantile analysis of the probabilistic Chronos outputs further identifies aggregation-specific operating points, and runtime measurements indicate that foundation model inference is fast enough for practical deployment. Overall, the findings highlight peak-aware evaluation and aggregation specific quantile selection as a practical pathway toward more operationally relevant STLF in distribution networks.

Accurate load forecasting at multiple grid levels is essential for future smart grids, ranging from aggregated control area forecasts for balancing supply and demand to forecasts of individual end-consumer loads for demand-side management and energy management systems. We present a comprehensive benchmark for load forecasting across grid levels, comprising three datasets that represent a transmission system operator control area, low-voltage grid feeders, and individual end consumers. We evaluate ten methods for short-term load forecasting and find that Transformer-based approaches consistently outperform established methods, reducing forecast error by 6.6-10.7 %. To analyze the impact of architectural design, we introduce YAformer, a flexible Transformer architecture that integrates modifications from prior work and is optimized via hyperparameter optimization. However, the standard Transformer achieves superior performance, suggesting that these architectural modifications are not required for accurate load forecasting. We further evaluate the Transformer-based time-series foundation model Chronos-2, which demonstrates competitive zero-shot performance on two datasets but fails to accurately capture special events in the TSO data. Detailed analyses reveal model-specific strengths and weaknesses, and ablation studies highlight the importance of long input contexts, covariates and continuous retraining - aspects that are often overlooked in the time-series forecasting literature.

Recent advances in Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) promise zero-shot forecasting capabilities with minimal task-specific training. While these models have shown strong performance across generic benchmarks, their applicability in volatile, complex electricity markets remains underexplored. Addressing this gap, this study provides a systematic empirical evaluation of several TSFMs, specifically Chronos-2 and Chronos-Bolt (developed by Amazon), and TimesFM 2.5 (provided by Google), for forecasting Belgian day-ahead and imbalance electricity prices. For both considered markets, Chronos-2 in ARX mode produces the most accurate forecasts. Compared with the best ensemble prediction from other machine learning methods, Chronos-2's Mean Absolute Error (MAE) is 5% lower for the day-ahead market. In contrast, the model yields 10% higher MAE predicting imbalance prices across all forecast horizons, except for the two-hour-ahead horizon. Moreover, we find that TSFMs exhibit genuine zero-shot forecasting skills but still struggle under extreme market conditions.