cs.CVJul 2, 2026

Efficient PEFT Methods with Adaptive Checkpointing for Vision Models and VLMs on Resource Constrained Consumer-GPUs

Authors: Altay ToktassynJurn-Gyu Park

Abstract

Modern pretrained vision models achieve strong accuracy but demand substantial GPU memory for fine-tuning, making edge deployment impractical. This paper compares five parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods (Full FT, LoRA, AdaLoRA, QLoRA, BitFit) on Transformers- (ViT-Small, TinyViT) and Mamba-based vision backbones (Vim-Small, MambaVision-T) under an on-device VRAM budget (e.g., 2 GB), together with three gradient-checkpointing strategies (none, static, and a proposed memory-budget-aware adaptive algorithm); and we evaluate three families of foundation-model baselines: zero-shot contrastive vision language models (OpenCLIP, SigLIP), self-supervised vision backbones with lightweight evaluation protocols (DINOv2), and autoregressive VLMs for prompt-based classification (PaliGemma, MobileVLM, SmolVLM). Experiments on CIFAR-100 and DTD report accuracy, training time, energy, and the NetScore family of multi-objective metrics, which we extend with two deployment-aware variants. QLoRA and BitFit cut energy 20-30% at a 1-2% accuracy cost; the adaptive algorithm reduces peak memory 43-79% with 9-30% energy overhead. DINOv2 surpasses fine-tuned models on CIFAR-100 (0.917 vs. 0.897) at a fraction of the energy, while small autoregressive VLMs remain uncompetitive.

Explore similar work

Aug 5, 2026cs.CL

Energy- and Memory-Efficient PEFT Methods for Personalized On-Device SLMs on Consumer GPUs

Despite rapid advances in large language models (LLMs), deploying and personalizing them on resource-constrained devices remains impractical due to high VRAM, time, and energy costs. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) of Small Language Models (SLMs) offers a promising alternative, yet few studies compare PEFT methods across architectures using both general and personalization benchmarks while accounting for energy consumption. We compare five fine-tuning approaches (Full Fine-Tuning, LoRA, LoRA+, QLoRA, and BitFit) on four SLMs from two families (Transformer-based: TinyLlama-1.1B, Qwen3-1.7B; SSM-based: Mamba-1.4B, Mamba-2-1.3B) across three GLUE tasks (SST-2, QNLI, STS-B) and three LaMP personalization tasks (LaMP-1, LaMP-2, LaMP-3). Each configuration is evaluated with the energy-focused NetScore-E and the memory-focused NetScore-M, the two variants that reflect the constraints binding on-device deployment. Methods are selected with a strict energy-first rule (highest NetScore-E, ties broken by NetScore#). LoRA+ achieves the highest NetScore-E in 19 of 24 configurations and the highest NetScore-M in 13 of 24, and is the selected method in 18 of 24. QLoRA, available only for the Transformer models, cuts peak finetuning VRAM by up to 3.9x relative to LoRA and therefore takes the best NetScore-M in 5 of the 12 Transformer configurations, although its de-quantization overhead leaves it selected in only one of them once energy decides. BitFit and full fine-tuning are almost never competitive on either variant, and TinyLlama-1.1B leads the energy-focused NetScore-E on five of the six benchmarks and the memory-focused NetScore-M on four. These results show that compact SLMs paired with PEFT provide a practical, energy-aware path to personalized on-device deployment, with the optimal method set by the dominant constraint: LoRA+ for energy and QLoRA for memory.
Kuanysh Akhmetzhanov, Jurn-Gyu Park
Aug 8, 2026cs.CV

Circuit Fine-Tuning for Compute-Efficient Transformer Adaptation

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) has become the de facto standard for adapting Vision Transformers (ViTs) to downstream tasks. While parameter count has been the dominant efficiency metric in PEFT, it does not imply \textit{compute efficiency}: parameter-sparse methods can still incur full-model training cost per step, and typically need long schedules to reach peak accuracy. We introduce Circuit Fine-Tuning (CFT), a compute-efficient framework that uses circuit discovery---conventionally used to explain trained models---to select modules for fine-tuning before training. Whereas attribution is conventionally formulated against a trained task head, we formulate it against a near-zero-initialized probe head, which isolates the response of the backbone to the target distribution rather than the preferences of a particular classifier. CFT then fine-tunes only the recovered subgraph. CFT needs no learning-rate warmup and reaches peak accuracy in 20{\sim}20 epochs on average---versus 4444--9696 for strong PEFT baselines---yielding 2.32.3--6.6×6.6\times fewer training FLOPs and up to 16×16\times less wall-clock time, while adding zero parameters and no inference operations. Experiments across a standard visual transfer benchmark (VTAB-1k), hierarchical backbones (Swin), domain-shifted medical imaging (CBIS-DDSM), and a vision-language model (Gemma-3 on CUB-200) demonstrate the effectiveness of CFT. Code is available at https://github.com/UriKialy/CFT
Uri Z. Kialy, Gil Ben-Artzi
Apr 17, 2026cs.CV

AdaVFM: Adaptive Vision Foundation Models for Edge Intelligence via LLM-Guided Execution

Language-aligned vision foundation models (VFMs) enable versatile visual understanding for always-on contextual AI, but their deployment on edge devices is hindered by strict latency and power constraints. We present AdaVFM, an adaptive framework for efficient on-device inference of language-aligned VFMs that dynamically adjusts computation based on scene context and task complexity. Our key insight is that the effect of model size reduction on performance is task-dependent in vision applications, motivating a runtime-adaptive execution strategy. AdaVFM integrates neural architecture search (NAS) into the language-aligned VFM backbone to enable lightweight subnet execution during runtime. A multimodal large language model (LLM) deployed on the cloud enables runtime control with a context-aware agent. This synergy allows efficient model adaptation under diverse conditions while maintaining strong accuracy. Extensive experiments on zero-shot classification and open-vocabulary segmentation demonstrate that AdaVFM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy-efficiency trade-offs, surpassing prior baselines by up to 7.9%7.9\% in acc@1 on IN1K and 5.2%5.2\% mIoU on ADE20K over the best models of comparable VFM sizes. For models with similar accuracy, AdaVFM further reduces average FLOPs by up to 77.9%77.9\%.
Yiwei Zhao, Yi Zheng, Huapeng Su +9