TACTIC-KG: Toward Small Agent Teams for Cyber Threat Intelligence Knowledge Graph Construction

Cybersecurity Knowledge Graphs (CKGs) unify diverse Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) sources into structured, queryable formats, offering scalable solutions for automating proactive and real-time security responses. Their increasing adoption has significantly enhanced the workflow and decision-making efficiency of security professionals. However, constructing CKGs requires extracting entity-relation triples from unstructured CTI reports, a task hindered by complex report structure, domain-specific language, and semantic ambiguity. As a result, existing pipeline-based approaches often suffer from error propagation, reducing extraction accuracy and limiting generalizability. This paper introduces the Context-aware Threat Intelligence Knowledge Graph (CTiKG) framework, a pipeline architecture designed to accurately extract and classify threat entities and their relationships from CTI reports. CTiKG incorporates hybrid NLP models that leverage SecureBERT+ contextual embeddings and expert knowledge from a domain ontology to reduce misclassifications and mitigate cascading errors. Experiments on the DNRTI-AUG-STIX2 dataset, which comprises 21 entity types aligned with STIX 2.1, demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, yielding 3-4% gains in NER and up to 8% in RE performance, based on precision, recall, and F1-score. Additional validation on DNRTI and STUCCO benchmarks confirms the framework's robustness and practical applicability. All datasets, including the curated DNRTI-AUG-STIX2, are released on GitHub to foster reproducibility and further research.

Security knowledge graphs can provide computable external memory for security agents, but constructing them from long-form cyber threat intelligence (CTI) remains difficult: LLMs often lack grounded security-domain knowledge, and end-to-end document-to-graph training is hard to supervise with cheap, stable rewards. We present GRID (Graph Representation of Intelligence Data), an end-to-end framework for security text knowledge graph construction. GRID first builds security-domain supervision from CTI articles by creating traceable article-graph alignments through graph extraction and knowledge-graph-conditioned text revision. It then turns document-to-graph learning into a scripted task bank combining four-option multi-select questions with triple-level regex matching targets, yielding more stable task-specific rewards than repeatedly scoring full graph outputs with an LLM judge. Using this supervision pipeline, we train two Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507-based 4B extractors: a primary Task-bank Reward model and a secondary End2End Reward model with LLM-as-judge precision/recall rewards. On 249 CTI articles from GRID, CASIE, CTINexus, MalKG, and SecureNLP, the Task-bank Reward model with the ontology-guided GRID extraction pipeline reaches 84.62% source-averaged precision, 64.91% source-averaged recall, and 68.53% Avg F1, achieving the best source-averaged recall and near-top Avg F1 with lower token usage and deployment cost. The End2End Reward model reaches 76.91% precision, 53.85% recall, and 58.06% Avg F1. Further analyses show that task-bank rewards can be built once offline and reused across later post-training runs, outperforming online End2End LLM-as-judge reward and weaker alternatives such as Choice-only Reward and End2End SFT without RL.

When a security researcher publishes a report on a cyberattack, detection engineers are supposed to turn it into working detection rules. In practice, most automated attempts at this only extract the simplest clues from the report --- bad IP addresses, domain names, and file hashes --- and turn them into block lists. This is a weak strategy, because attackers can change these simple clues within hours or days, so the resulting detections stop working almost as soon as they are deployed. Security teams describe this idea with the Pyramid of Pain. This project asks whether feeding a report into a knowledge-graph retrieval system, Microsoft GraphRAG, rather than a standard vector-similarity retrieval system (Naive RAG), produces detection plans that rely more on these durable, top-of-pyramid clues. Both systems are given the same report, the same generation instructions, and the same language model to write the final plan; only the retrieval step differs. In a detailed case study of one APT28 report, the GraphRAG plan kept firing at 100% of its detections after every IP address, domain, and file hash in the report was rotated, while the Naive RAG plan kept firing at only 29%. Repeating the comparison across nine real CTI reports from four vendors confirms the same pattern: GraphRAG plans consistently reach higher, harder-to-evade levels of the pyramid, even when the two systems end up close on total score. The results support treating knowledge-graph-aware retrieval as the architecturally correct foundation for automatically generating SOC-deployable hunting plans, while showing that the wording of the generation prompt matters almost as much as the retrieval back-end itself.