On Explicit Super-Expressive Approximation for Neural Networks

The statistical accuracy of neural networks depends on both their approximation power and the complexity of the class fitted from data. While increasing network size is a natural way to improve approximation, parameter magnitude provides another resource whose role must be quantified in both respects. We establish a sharp width--magnitude tradeoff at fixed depth using one elementary bounded $1$-Lipschitz Dyadic--Triangular Activation. For the unit $β$-Hölder ball on $[0,1]^d$ with $0<β\leq1$, the optimal $L^p$ approximation error for $0<p<\infty$ is of order $[N^2\log(eNT)]^{-β/d}$ when the network width satisfies $N\geq2d+3$ and the parameter magnitudes are bounded by $T\geq1$. Matching lower bounds hold for every fixed globally Hölder activation; its Hölder exponent affects the constants but not the rate. Under bounded design densities and independent centered sub-Gaussian noise, approximate least squares over the full clipped class at depth $23$ attains the classical Hölder minimax risk $\mathcal{O}(M^{-\frac{2β}{2β+d}})$ without logarithmic loss whenever $N^2\log(eNT)\asymp M^{\frac{d}{2β+d}}$, where $M$ is the sample size. This yields a continuum of statistically optimal choices, ranging from unit parameter radius to fixed network size. At fixed size, four hidden layers with at most $8d+7$ nonzero parameters give a near-optimal radius, while six layers with at most $8d+27$ attain the optimal order $\log T=\mathcal{O}(η^{-d/β})$ at approximation error $η$. The same decoding method also yields fixed-size Transformer approximation.

Universal approximation theorems provide a mathematical explanation for the expressive power of neural networks. They assert that, under mild conditions on the activation function, feedforward neural networks are dense in broad function classes, such as continuous functions on compact subsets of $\mathbb{R}^d$, $L^p$ spaces, or Sobolev spaces. Over the past four decades, these qualitative universality results have evolved into a rich quantitative theory addressing approximation rates, parameter efficiency, and the role of architectural features such as depth and width. This survey presents several glimpses into this theory. We review classical density results for single-hidden-layer networks, as well as quantitative bounds that relate approximation error to network size and smoothness assumptions on target functions. Particular emphasis is placed on depth--width trade-offs and on results demonstrating that deeper architectures can achieve superior parameter efficiency for structured function classes. In addition to standard feedforward neural networks, we also review recent developments on Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks (KANs), which offer an alternative architectural paradigm and whose approximation-theoretic properties have begun to attract significant theoretical attention.

We study neural networks with trainable low-degree rational activation functions and show that they are more expressive and parameter-efficient than modern piecewise-linear and smooth activations such as ELU, LeakyReLU, LogSigmoid, PReLU, ReLU, SELU, CELU, Sigmoid, SiLU, Mish, Softplus, Tanh, Softmin, Softmax, and LogSoftmax. For an error target of $\varepsilon>0$, we establish approximation-theoretic separations: Any network built from standard fixed activations can be uniformly approximated on compact domains by a rational-activation network with only $\mathrm{poly}(\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$ overhead in size, while the converse provably requires $Ω(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ parameters in the worst case. This exponential gap persists at the level of full networks and extends to gated activations and transformer-style nonlinearities. In practice, rational activations integrate seamlessly into standard architectures and training pipelines, allowing rationals to match or outperform fixed activations under identical architectures and optimizers.