cs.HCJul 9, 2026

ImputeViz: A Visual Analytics Dashboard for Diagnosing Missing Data and Comparing Imputation Methods

Authors: Aitik Dandapat, Lalith Punepalle Raveendrareddy, Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Klaus Mueller

Organizations: Stony Brook University

Abstract

Missing data is a persistent obstacle in scientific, social science, and public health research, often biasing analyses and placing accountability on analysts for how they handle missing values. We introduce ImputeViz, an integrated visual analytics dashboard that supports diagnosing missingness, configuring imputation models, and evaluating results. The system brings together widely used methods, including MICE, Random Forest, XGBoost, and kNN, within an interactive environment that makes missingness patterns explicit. To support geospatial reasoning, we introduce gKNN, a geographically informed kNN variant that blends socioeconomic and spatial distances and exposes donor contributions, enabling provenance-based visual accountability by showing which regions drive each estimate. Our primary contribution is a method-agnostic visual analytics environment that makes cross-method comparison a first-class visual task and integrates gKNN alongside standard methods. Coordinated views reveal missingness structure through heatmaps, co-missingness summaries, and distributional diagnostics that help analysts reason about missingness patterns (MCAR/MAR) and cases where missingness may be non-random (MNAR). Users can compare and tune models and interrogate results via distributional overlays, a Method Comparison Summary reporting MAE, RMSE, Delta RMSE, and runtime for each algorithm on the current target and mask, along with variable-level discrepancy views. Cached per-method results and locked axis scales reduce cognitive overhead from shifting ranges during method switching. These comparisons highlight where methods disagree, which variables are sensitive, and how imputation choices affect downstream summaries. Case studies demonstrate how ImputeViz helps analysts select effective strategies, surface sensitive variables, and assess model robustness.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jul 3, 2026stat.ML

Missing Data Imputation under Manifold Hypothesis

The manifold hypothesis posits that high-dimensional data are concentrated near a low-dimensional embedded manifold. Recent advances in mixture variational autoencoders (VAEs) provide a powerful tool for extracting such underlying structure in a faithful manner. The resulting geometric structure naturally introduces local and global relationships among variables, thereby providing a systematic way of imputing missing data. We propose a model-based imputation method that enables sampling from p(xmis∣xobs)p(\bm{x}_{\mathrm{mis}} \mid \bm{x}_{\mathrm{obs}}) via a sampling-importance-resampling (SIR) procedure, which can be further augmented with a joint diffusion model in the latent space. Our method imputes missing data while respecting the underlying geometry, achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art procedures, quantifies uncertainty in the imputations, and is model-based, thereby enabling on-the-fly imputation without rerunning the entire procedure.
Zelong Bi, Amuchechukwu Ibenegbu, Sarat Moka
ImputationMissingnessStatistical ManifoldManifoldsLatent SpaceInterpolation+2
AskPDF
Jun 3, 2026cs.LG

Learning What Not to Impute: An Uncertainty-Aware Diffusion Framework for Meaningful Missingness

Missing value imputation is a fundamental task in machine learning, with most existing methods assuming that all missing entries correspond to unobserved regular values. In many real-world datasets, however, missingness may arise from two distinct sources: some entries are meaningfully missing (intrinsically absent and semantically valid), while others are missing due to the observation process and should be imputed. We formalize this distinction as a selective imputation problem, where the goal is to jointly infer which missing entries should be preserved and which should be recovered. To address this challenge, we propose Diff-Joint, a diffusion-based framework that jointly models tabular data together with a latent missingness mask. The method alternates between conditional sampling and uncertainty-aware aggregation to iteratively refine both imputed values and missingness labels. Empirical results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that Diff-Joint effectively identifies meaningfully missing entries while achieving competitive imputation accuracy and improved downstream task performance.
Lixing Zhang, Yidong Ouyang, Weifu Li +3
ImputationMissingnessMissing Modalities
AskPDF
Jul 9, 2026cs.LG

Pattern-Aware Graph Neural Networks for Handling Missing Data

Missing data is ubiquitous in real-world datasets. Traditional methods either discard incomplete samples or apply imputation techniques that ignore potentially informative missingness patterns, implicitly assuming that missingness occurs randomly. However, missingness patterns might provide additional information. We propose pattern-aware graph neural networks that explicitly encode which features are missing alongside observed values. We used four encoding strategies -- learned embeddings, frozen random embeddings, statistical features, and hierarchical representations -- across seven UCI datasets with naturally occurring missingness. Our Pattern-aware methods achieve substantial improvements over baselines, with an average improvement of 17% in balanced accuracy and 22% in F1-macro across all datasets. The benefits vary significantly by dataset: annealing shows dramatic improvement (+80% balanced accuracy), while hepatitis and soybean show minimal gains (+4--5%). Notably, even simple random pattern embeddings perform comparably to learned embeddings (0.650 vs 0.663 balanced accuracy), suggesting that distinguishing between patterns may be more important than task-specific optimization. Our ablation study reveals that attention mechanisms, while helpful, are not critical when pattern information is available -- simple mean aggregation with pattern awareness achieves 0.640 balanced accuracy compared to 0.645 for attention-based variants.
Minett Tran, Taehee Jeong
MissingnessGraph Neural NetworksData MiningAttention-Based MethodsReal-World Clinical DatasetUnimodal Encoders
AskPDF