cs.CVJul 9, 2026

Is sub-metre resolution necessary for cocoa mapping? A landscape-stratified evaluation of very high resolution imagery, decametric Earth Observation inputs, and operational products in Cote d'Ivoire

Authors: Kasimir OrlowskiFilip SaboMichele MeroniAstrid VerhegghenMariana BelgiuFelix Rembold

Organizations: Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Hallenweg 8, 7522 NH Enschede, The Netherlands. · FINCONS S.P.A., Via Torri Bianche 10, Palazzo Betulla, 20871 Vimercate, Italy. · European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi, 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy. · Seidor Consulting, Carrer de Veneçuela 74, 08019 Barcelona, Spain. · ARHS Developments Italia S.R.L., Via Fratelli Gabba 1/A, 20121 Milan, Italy. · Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.

Abstract

Accurate cocoa mapping is increasingly important for deforestation monitoring, supply-chain transparency, and regulatory applications. Spatial aggregation in conventional medium-resolution Earth observation (EO) imagery may limit cocoa detection in heterogeneous smallholder landscapes. In Cote d'Ivoire, we therefore evaluated how mapping performance varies across landscape conditions, whether very high resolution (VHR) imagery provides a meaningful advantage, and whether foundation-model embeddings improve decametric cocoa mapping. We developed models using 0.5 m Pleiades VHR imagery, a 10 m Sentinel-2 annual composite, and embeddings from TESSERA and AlphaEarth Foundations (AEF), and additionally assessed four publicly available cocoa mapping products. Performance was evaluated through a landscape-stratified accuracy assessment using 2,821 independently interpreted reference points distributed across gradients of tree cover density and landscape fragmentation. The VHR model achieved the highest performance (F1 = 0.92) and maintained F1-scores above 0.90 across all strata. Among the decametric inputs, TESSERA performed best (F1 = 0.86), followed by AEF (F1 = 0.82) and Sentinel-2 (F1 = 0.76). Of the existing cocoa products, the Kalischek product performed best (F1 = 0.83), comparable to the internally trained AEF model. Performance differences between VHR and decametric approaches increased with fragmentation and under low and high tree cover density conditions. Targeted VHR acquisition may therefore be particularly beneficial in complex cocoa landscapes, while foundation-model embeddings offer a scalable alternative for large-area mapping.

Explore similar work

Sep 15, 2026cs.CV

From Foundation Embeddings to Cropland Maps: Label Efficiency, Temporal Transferability and Independent Human Validation

Geospatial foundation models provide reusable representations of satellite imagery that support downstream mapping with limited task-specific modelling. We evaluate whether annual AlphaEarth embeddings support binary cultivated-versus-non-cultivated mapping in Maine, USA, using 192 spatially separated patches and labels derived from the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL). Without fine-tuning the foundation model, a lightweight classifier reaches 93.7% overall accuracy and 90.8% balanced accuracy on held-out patches. Logistic regression is within 0.3 percentage points of a gradient-boosted ensemble, while a nearest-class-centroid rule, which uses class centroids but fits no parameters, reaches 90.2%. A balanced sample of 60,000 labelled pixels is within 1.3 percentage points of the full pool of 8.6 million pixels; because pixels are spatially autocorrelated, this result concerns pixel-sample efficiency rather than 60,000 independent annotation sites. In a same-region transfer experiment, classifiers trained in one year remain accurate across 2018 to 2023. Against a blind, two-interpreter consensus at 385 randomly sampled points in one contiguous 2023 block, the AlphaEarth-plus-random-forest map agrees at 95.3% (κ=0.82κ=0.82), compared with 91.7% for the CDL (κ=0.72κ=0.72; exact two-sided McNemar p=0.0161p=0.0161). This local result is consistent with partial smoothing of CDL label noise, but it does not establish statewide correction of the reference product. On the same points, the difference from a fine-tuned TerraMind segmentation model is not statistically significant (95.3% versus 93.5%; p=0.14p=0.14), and the experiment is not a controlled comparison of computational cost. These results support frozen geospatial embeddings as a low-compute candidate for regional cropland mapping, subject to the limits of a single-state study, a 30 m-derived training reference, and a one-block human validation.
Mohammad Ammar Mughees, Giovanni Montefoschi, Zhongxin Chen +1
Aug 12, 2026cs.CV

A Remote Approach to Cashew Orchard Detection: Leveraging Active Learning with Satellite Imagery in Guinea-Bissau

Cashew production is a widespread economic activity in Guinea-Bissau, as well as other countries in West Africa. However, unregulated cashew production can be directly associated with increasing regionwide deforestation rates, biodiversity losses, and a fragile economic structure. There is no nationwide database for listing or georeferencing cashew orchards, so there is a clear need to remotely map their locations. In recent years, multiple methods for detecting orchards have been developed, though they have only been applied on a regional level. This work expands regional analyses to a nationwide scale. It develops a scalable and cost-effective remote approach, based on Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, using Machine Learning techniques to detect cashew orchards automatically. Margin-based Active Learning techniques were employed to develop an optimal training set in terms of the number of points and their informativeness, leading to a cashew map with 94.0% balanced accuracy obtained entirely off-site. We created two datasets and a 2021 cashew map with 10m spatial resolution that are openly accessible through GitHub. The results demonstrate the possibility of a broader cashew orchard mapping, creating a new stepping stone for this environmental application.
Miguel, Sofia, Maria +3
Jun 22, 2026cs.CV

Hedgementation = Hedgerow Segmentation: A Remote Sensing Benchmark

We propose Hedgementation: a new benchmark to evaluate machine learning models for hedgerow mapping from remote sensing data at country scale and 10m2^2 spatial resolution. We combine and harmonize multiple remote sensing data products and ground truth labels sourced from a hedgerow inventory in France. We measure the ability of three baseline models to generalize across spatial distance, and across climatic zones, a more explicitly challenging task. Our benchmark tests both supervised and self-supervised learning approaches for remote sensing, applied to tracking fine-scale features of high agricultural importance. The code to reproduce the benchmark and baselines results is available at https://github.com/hedgementation/hedgementation.
Nathan Senyard, Salem Hamdani, Astrid Zhang +4