cs.LGJul 11, 2026

How Query Visibility Changes KV-Cache Compression Rankings: A Matched-Budget Audit

Authors: Daming LuoChristy LiangJunyu Xuan

Organizations: University of Technology Sydney

Abstract

KV-cache compression methods are predominantly evaluated with the query appended to the context before compression -- a query-aware protocol. Yet the economic case for a compressed KV cache is reuse: compress a document once, answer many future questions against it. In that deployment, compression must happen query-agnostic -- before any question is seen. We present a matched-budget audit of six published compression methods against three trivial baselines on three open 7-9B models (144,300 paired evaluations on RULER-8192; 40,800 on LongBench; 50,000-resample paired bootstrap throughout). Everything is held fixed -- model, compression ratio, instances, decoding -- except the scoring rule. Three findings. (1) Query visibility changes the rankings: under the agnostic protocol, of the five audited methods that share a common attention backend, only KeyDiff beats a best-of-3 trivial baseline consistently (31 of 36 cells), and the most widely deployed method, SnapKV, loses to "keep the start and the recent window" on average (-0.066). (2) The per-method drop between the two protocols is ordered consistently with how visible the question is to each method's scoring signal, legible in its source code: from Delta=+0.198 for SnapKV (the question sits inside its 64-token observation window) down to Delta=+0.011 for KeyDiff (its score contains no query term at all).

Explore similar work

Aug 2, 2026cs.CL

RestoreKV: Recovering Full-Cache Behavior Under Aggressive Query-Agnostic KV Cache Eviction

Query-agnostic KV cache eviction compresses a context once and reuses the resulting cache for arbitrary future queries, but performance can collapse under tight budgets. Existing methods primarily improve which original KV pairs are retained. We introduce RestoreKV, which complements this selection-based formulation with learned restoration under the same total KV budget. Our key insight is that, although the information lost through eviction is context-specific, the mechanism for generating its compact complement can be shared across contexts. After context prefill, a few restore tokens attend to the full KV cache in a single LoRA-adapted pass, generating a compact, context-conditioned restore cache. The base importance scorer and eviction rule remain unchanged, and the adapters are disabled for all subsequent queries and decoding. RestoreKV is trained through parameter-efficient self-distillation from the frozen full-cache model, optimizing only 0.4%0.4\% of the parameters and requiring no task-specific tuning. Across four backbones and four long-context benchmarks, RestoreKV substantially reduces compression-induced degradation. On Qwen3-4B, it improves 59 of 60 paired, budget-matched settings across five base eviction methods; at a 5%5\% budget, it raises KVzip from 38.238.2 to 73.273.2 on RULER-4K. Applied to KVzip+, RestoreKV reaches 86.486.4 RULER accuracy at 16×16\times compression on the KVPress Benchmark, while adding less than 0.5%0.5\% one-time cache-construction overhead in a 32K-context evaluation. Our project page is available at https://paper.pnu-cvsp.com/RestoreKV/
Changwoo Baek, Seungjun Shin, Kyeongbo Kong
Sep 21, 2026cs.LG

KV-COBRA: KV Cache Compression via Co-Optimized Bit-Rank Allocation

What limits KV-cache compression at extreme bit-rates? We argue that it is not the choice of compression scheme, but how its budget is allocated across attention heads. Existing methods apply rank and bit-width uniformly, ignoring that each head has a different optimal mix of rank truncation and quantization. We show that co-optimizing rank and bit-width per head, using only standard low-rank projection and scalar quantization, dominates uniform allocation, with the largest gains at low bit-rates. Our method, KV-COBRA (Co-Optimized Bit-Rank Allocation), formalizes this as a resource-allocation problem: it balances rank-truncation loss against quantization loss within each head, then redistributes budget across heads to minimize total distortion. A fused Hadamard rotation equalizes per-channel variance, and reordering the SVD basis by attention-KL importance makes the solver query-aware. The same allocator extends to joint K+VK{+}V compression. On perplexity, zero-shot, and long-context benchmarks from 0.50.5 to 44 bits per dimension (bpd), KV-COBRA shows the smallest accuracy degradation among evaluated methods at low bpd, with no per-token overhead.
Sihyeon Ha, Jaeho Lee, Yo-Seb Jeon
Jul 1, 2026cs.LG

The risk of KV cache compression

Transformer inference on long sequences is expensive because softmax attention repeatedly reads from a large KV cache. The prevalent approach to this bottleneck is KV cache compression, which replaces the full cache with a compact summary. Despite its practical importance, the design of such summaries is largely driven by empirical experimentation. On the theoretical side, existing results show that KV cache compression can be impossible in the worst case, but offer little systematic guidance for designing algorithms in regimes where accurate compression is possible. We bridge this gap by characterizing the minimax risk of KV cache compression in terms of the intrinsic compressibility of a cache, revealing when and how accurate compression is possible. These results yield novel design principles for KV cache compression under causal masking that map efficiently to prefill and autoregressive decoding while achieving minimax-optimal risk. We instantiate these principles in a practical algorithm and report promising performance on LongBench in targeted experiments. Overall, our results provide a principled avenue for practical KV cache compression with theoretical guarantees.
Lukas Haverbeck, Carmen Amo Alonso, Andres Felipe Posada-Moreno +2