LP Mining with LP2Graph: A Use Case for Railway Rescheduling

Solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs) requires not only efficient algorithms but also carefully crafted formulations. While recent works have leveraged LLMs to automate optimization modeling, current frameworks predominantly rely on a rigid mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) paradigm. In this paper, we argue that not all problems are best modeled as MILP, as forcing complex domains into linear constraints can induce prohibitive modeling complexity and severely restrict solver flexibility. To address this, we propose OptiDSL, a framework that shifts the focus from rigid MILP formulations to domain-specific language (DSL) representations. By utilizing LLMs to map natural language onto standardized, domain-accepted structures, OptiDSL decouples problem formulation from execution. This paradigm enables seamless integration with a diverse library of specialized solvers, ranging from traditional heuristics to modern learning-based methods. Experimental results on the comprehensive benchmark of 44 COP types show that OptiDSL significantly surpasses MILP-based pipelines, yielding a 51.66% gain in formulation accuracy and a 91.71% decrease in modeling time. Notably, it also outperforms MILP-based pipelines on the existing benchmark, achieving a 23.09% higher formulation accuracy. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/OptiDSL.

Mathematical programming provides a common language for many decisions embedded in modern machine-learning (ML) and artificial-intelligence (AI) systems: selecting retrieval context, routing tokens, allocating inference compute, fitting structured predictors, protecting against distribution shift, and balancing competing objectives. However, the relevant literature is fragmented across optimization, information retrieval, recommendation, natural-language processing, computer vision, and learning theory. This paper organizes various applications under common mathematical programming paradigms: linear, quadratic, binary and mixed-integer, conic, bilevel, multi-objective, inverse, distributionally robust, submodular, and min--max optimization. We normalize the models with a mostly unified notation and, for every application, identify inputs, decision variables, a principal formulation, structural properties, solution strategies, and limitations. Across paradigms, we compare tractability, relaxation quality, decomposition, approximation guarantees, and scalability bottlenecks. The paper shows that mathematical programming is most useful not as a claim that all learning is LP or MIP, but as a disciplined interface between predictions and constrained decisions.

Managing disruptions in railway traffic management is a major challenge. Rising traffic density and infrastructure limits increase complexity, making the Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Problem (VRSP) difficult to solve reliably and in real time. While Operational Research (OR) methods are widely used, most dispatching still relies on human expertise due to the problem's exponential combinatorial complexity. Reinforcement Learning (RL) has gained attention for its potential in multi-agent coordination, but existing RL approaches often underperform OR methods and struggle to scale in dense rail networks. This paper addresses this gap from a machine learning perspective by introducing a semi-hierarchical RL formulation tailored to operational railway constraints. The method separates dispatching from routing through dedicated action and observation spaces, enabling policies to specialise in distinct decision scopes and addressing the imbalance between rare dispatch decisions and frequent routing updates. The approach is evaluated on the Flatland-RL simulator across five difficulty levels and 50 random seeds, with 7 to 80 trains. Results show substantially improved coordination, resource utilisation, and robustness compared with heuristic baselines and monolithic RL, nearly doubling the number of trains reaching their destinations, while keeping deadlock rates below 5% and adaptively sequencing, delaying, or cancelling trains under heavy congestion.