q-fin.STJul 14, 2026

When Directional Accuracy Lies: A Base-Rate-Honest Benchmark for LoRA-Adapted TimesFM on Equity Forecasting

Authors: Taizhen Cheung

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Large pretrained time-series models such as TimesFM are attractive for financial forecasting, but raw directional accuracy is a misleading scoreboard in equity markets. An early LoRA adapter in this project appeared to reach roughly 80% directional accuracy; we show this is not evidence of skill. Over a long horizon in a rising market, a trivial "always-up" rule attains comparably high accuracy without using the input at all. To separate genuine skill from this base-rate artifact, we build a reproducible, frozen-data benchmark with expanding walk-forward folds, a stratified held-out-ticker split, honest baselines (zero-shot TimesFM, always-up, random-walk, persistence, AR(1)), and paired significance tests (McNemar, Diebold-Mariano) under Benjamini-Hochberg FDR control. We apply the identical method to two universes -- a tech-heavy NASDAQ-100 and a broad S&P 500 -- reporting excess accuracy over the always-up base rate. Three findings replicate. First, when the historical ~80% condition is recreated, the high number is a base rate of ~0.70 that the fine-tuned model scores below. Second, pooled LoRA shows no directional skill over the base rate at any horizon on either universe (negative at the six-month horizon). Third, per-sector specialization is significantly worse than a single pooled adapter (Diebold-Mariano p<0.001 on held-out stocks at h=128). Fine-tuning's only measurable benefit is a statistically significant reduction in point-forecast error relative to zero-shot TimesFM, which nonetheless does not beat naive baselines and confers no tradeable directional edge. The contribution is methodological: a defensible, fully seeded protocol that prevents the base-rate trap, together with the replicated negative result it produces.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Aug 9, 2026cs.LG

Hybrid Neural-Classical Correction for Frozen Time Series Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Ablation Study on High-Frequency Stock Prediction

Foundation models for time series forecasting demonstrate impressive zero-shot generalization but often underperform on specialized domains such as high-frequency finance. We present a comprehensive study of hybrid neural-classical correction for adapting frozen TimesFM (200M parameters) to stock return prediction during the volatile opening trading hour. We compare two neural correction architectures - AttnCorrect (multi-head self-attention, approximately 471K parameters) and GatedLinear (low-rank bilinear projection with gating, approximately 49K parameters) - each augmented with Random Forest residual learning. Through systematic ablation across 10 major technology stocks (NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOG, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, TSLA, NFLX) spanning 2 million data points, we reveal critical insights: (1) The hybrid neural-classical approach achieves 0.597 pooled correlation and 6.4x mean per-day correlation improvement over frozen TimesFM; (2) Classical residual learning (Random Forest) provides the largest single-component contribution, matching or exceeding the neural correction component; (3) Simpler neural architectures surprisingly outperform complex ones when classical residual learning is removed; (4) Self-attention provides the largest neural-only contribution. GatedLinear+RF achieves best overall performance with 9x fewer neural parameters than AttnCorrect+RF. We report three complementary correlation metrics - mean per-day, cross-day cumulative, and pooled - to provide a complete picture of predictive quality. Our results provide practical guidance: effective foundation model adaptation requires careful integration of neural and classical components, with classical methods playing a crucial complementary role.
Kasun Dewage, Suranadi De Silva, Shankhadeep Mondal
Time Series Foundation ModelsStochastic VolatilityBidirectional Long Short-Term MemoryAblation
AskPDF
Aug 4, 2026q-fin.MF

From Financial Sentiment Classification to Return Predictability: A QLoRA Benchmark of Large Language Models

Financial sentiment classifiers are commonly evaluated against human labels, but strong linguistic performance does not necessarily imply economically useful return predictability. This study separates these questions through two experiments. First, we construct a unified three-class benchmark from five financial text datasets and compare TF--IDF Naive Bayes, off-the-shelf FinBERT and Financial-RoBERTa encoders, zero-shot Qwen2.5-7B, and QLoRA-adapted Qwen2.5-7B, LLaMA3-8B, and Mistral-7B models. Mistral-7B achieves the best test accuracy (0.8840) and macro-F1 (0.8771), while QLoRA raises Qwen2.5's macro-F1 from 0.7274 to 0.8615. An inverse-frequency class-weighted loss does not improve Qwen2.5. Second, we evaluate economic validity on a temporally separate 2019 Benzinga sample containing 10,637 unique headlines and 13,115 headline--stock observations for a fixed S&P~100 universe. Model probabilities are converted into continuous sentiment scores, aggregated by stock and signal date, and aligned with next-session returns over one-, two-, three-, and five-day horizons. All seven downstream models produce positive but small mean rank information coefficients at the one-day horizon; the largest is 0.0143 for FinBERT. None of the 28 model--horizon tests remains significant after Newey--West inference and false-discovery-rate correction. Portfolio results likewise fail to establish a robust advantage for the best-performing classifiers. The findings show that QLoRA is effective for financial sentiment adaptation, while also documenting a clear gap between classification accuracy and tradable cross-sectional signals.
Fusheng Luo
Financial Sentiment AnalysisLegal Natural Language Processing BenchmarksLow-Rank Adaptation
AskPDF
May 23, 2026cs.AI

Summoning the Oracle to Slay It: Mitigating Look-Ahead Bias in Financial Backtesting with Large Language Models

Backtesting large language models (LLMs) on historical financial data is unreliable because pre-training cuts off after the events happened. An LLM trained in 2024 already "knows" which way 2018-2020 stocks moved. We name this failure parametric look-ahead bias and propose FinCAD, an inference-time adaptation of Context-Aware Decoding that suppresses an LLM's memory of historical outcomes without retraining. FinCAD pairs an adversarial bias-discovery pipeline that learns a model-specific memory-activating prior prompt with an entity- and date-adaptive rule that scales the CAD strength to per-(entity, date) memorisation, so the penalty fires on memorised in-sample dates and decays to zero out-of-sample. Across five 7-14B LLMs and five mega-cap equities, FinCAD cuts in-sample backtest returns by up to -67.1% on memorised dates while leaving 2025 out-of-sample returns within $8K and Sharpe within 0.10 of baseline, and preserves general-purpose reasoning within 1.7 pts. On an eleven-model leaderboard, it raises the in-sample / out-of-sample Spearman correlation from +0.779 to +0.846, recovering rankings that genuinely predict out-of-sample performance.
Weixian Waylon Li, Mengyu Wang, Tiejun Ma
Finance DomainLarge Language Model PerformanceLookaheadOracles
AskPDF