When is the combined load identifiable from a stress-intensity profile? A coupled forward-inverse study on SIFBench finite-element data

We study inverse problems where an unknown potential is observed only through samples from the measure it induces by a convex variational principle. Such problems arise in learning costs, energies, and dynamics from distributional data, but the associated forward solution map is typically nonlinear and implicit. We show that its optimality gap nevertheless yields convex empirical objectives for finite-dimensional potential classes, and we introduce sharpened Fenchel--Young losses that add a data-dependent discrepancy inside the forward problem. This keeps the estimator calibrated while improving the local geometry of the loss. Our main stability theorem separates the inverse error analysis into measurement error, forward perturbation, and empirical curvature. We instantiate this principle for inverse entropic unbalanced optimal transport and for inverse Jordan--Kinderlehrer--Otto (JKO) learning from independent snapshot samples, obtaining high-probability parameter recovery bounds. JKO schemes discretize Wasserstein gradient flows through a sequence of variational problems over measures, making them a natural language for population dynamics observed through snapshots. In this JKO case, the sharpened objective reduces to an unbalanced transport problem, which also clarifies the connection between variational gap losses and quadratic iJKO$^\star$ surrogates. Numerical experiments illustrate the conditioning effect of sharpening and its benefits for sparse inverse-gradient-flow recovery.

Identifying anisotropic yield functions remains challenging since yielding is not directly observed in full-field mechanical measurements, directional calibration can require many loading directions, and selecting an appropriate analytical form is nontrivial. This study proposes a physics-informed framework for discovering yield functions from full-field displacement data and reaction force data, without stress observations, plastic strain measurements, direct yield surface data, or a prescribed parametric yield function. The framework identifies the yield function as a mechanically constrained constitutive component inside elastoplastic stress integration, rather than through direct stress-space supervision. The yield function is represented by a convex neural network that enforces convexity and positive homogeneity of degree one while imposing the assumed tension-compression symmetry, and this neural yield function is trained with a differentiable stress update and a physics-informed force equilibrium loss across multiple loading cases. The proposed framework is validated using finite element (FE) benchmark studies with von Mises, Hill 1948, and Yld2000-2d yield functions, assessing yield contour agreement, displacement-noise sensitivity, identifiability through plastically active stress states, epistemic uncertainty, and polynomial-surrogate deployment. This study provides a mechanics-constrained pathway for discovering anisotropic yield functions from displacement and force data while keeping the identified component within the structure of elastoplastic stress integration.

Automatic-differentiation-based inverse analysis methods, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and differentiable programming, have recently shown great promise due to their ability to compute accurate gradients and convergence efficiency. However, their applicability to falling weight deflectometer (FWD) backcalculation remains unexplored. This study critically evaluates PINN-based inverse analysis for a multilayer pavement system and investigates differentiable finite element method (DiffFEM) as an alternative based on a synthetic benchmark. The standard PINN does not recover layer moduli because of the sharp domain discontinuities inherent to layered pavement systems. Although we use an extended PINN with domain decomposition (XPINN), which shows better performance on discontinuous domains, its performance remains highly sensitive to loss weighting and network architecture, and degrades under measurement noise. By contrast, DiffFEM consistently achieves more accurate, stable, and computationally efficient inversion results. These results indicate that DiffFEM, which enforces the governing physics as a hard constraint, yields better accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency than PINN-based approaches, in which the governing physics is imposed as a soft constraint through the loss function. More broadly, the findings suggest that the choice between PINN- and DiffFEM-based inverse analysis needs careful consideration, with DiffFEM offering practical advantages when an efficient and robust differentiable forward solver is available.