Greedy Volume Maximization of Gradient Embeddings for Long-Tailed Frame-Level Bioacoustic Active Learning

Eco-acoustic monitoring generates vast volumes of audio data, making active learning a promising approach for reducing annotation effort while efficiently training reliable biodiversity classifiers. This report presents CARE-DPP, a batch active-learning acquisition method submitted to BioDCASE Active Learning for Bioacoustics 2026 challenge. The method combines class-balanced predictive uncertainty with embedding-space novelty, while a determinantal point process (DPP) objective selects a high-quality and non-redundant acquisition batch. The uncertainty-novelty balance is annealed over the annotation budget: early cycles emphasize geometric coverage, whereas later cycles increasingly exploit classifier uncertainty. To mitigate unreliable early scores, the DPP candidate pool mixes top-quality candidates with a decreasing proportion of random exploration. An adaptive acquisition schedule uses smaller batches early and larger batches later. Evaluated over five repeats on the BirdSet HSN, POW and UHH subsets and on ATBFL, CARE-DPP obtains a mean development AULC of 0.50 for macro mAP, compared with 0.46 for the official CoreSet baseline. Ablations identify DPP batch diversification and the adaptive acquisition schedule as the largest contributors.

Active learning is a promising framework for reducing annotation costs in large-scale bioacoustic monitoring, where expert labeling is expensive and data distributions are highly heterogeneous across environments. However, existing sample selection strategies often rely on static criteria that do not adapt to the evolving reliability of model predictions during training. This limitation can lead to suboptimal exploration-exploitation trade-offs and redundant sample selection. We propose an active learning strategy for multilabel bioacoustic event classification that jointly models predictive uncertainty, embedding-space diversity, and intra-batch redundancy. The method introduces an adaptive weighting scheme that progressively shifts from diversity-driven exploration in high-uncertainty regimes toward uncertainty-driven exploitation as the model becomes more confident, reflecting the increasing reliability of the classifier. To further improve annotation efficiency, a greedy Maximum Marginal Relevance (MMR) procedure is used to enforce diversity among selected samples within each acquisition batch. We evaluate the proposed approach within the BioDCASE 2026 Task 4 active learning framework on terrestrial (BirdSet) and marine (ATBFL) benchmarks using pretrained audio embeddings and a fixed annotation budget. Experimental results show consistent improvements in learning efficiency and competitive in terms of macro mean Average Precision (mAP) and Area Under the Learning Curve (AULC) across heterogeneous acoustic domains. The gains are particularly pronounced on structured terrestrial soundscapes, while performance remains competitive under noisier marine conditions. These findings demonstrate that adaptive acquisition strategies combining uncertainty estimation, embedding-space diversity, and redundancy-aware batch construction provide an effective and robust solution for [...].

Ecological monitoring increasingly relies on machine learning models, whose performance depends on the quality and quantity of labelled data. However, obtaining these labels is costly, particularly in passive acoustic monitoring, where vast amounts of data are collected but only a small proportion can feasibly be annotated. Active learning addresses this bottleneck by prioritizing which samples should be labelled. However, progress is difficult to measure, because published methods are evaluated under different models, budgets, evaluation metrics and datasets. To address this challenge, we present the 2026 Active Learning for Bioacoustics BioDCASE challenge: a systematic evaluation of sampling methods designed to identify effective AL strategies. Participant methods were evaluated across four subsets composed of terrestrial and marine data. Across ten proposed sampling methods from seven teams, the top-ranked method achieved an area under the learning curve 26.4 % higher than random sampling at the same annotation budget, averaged over four data subsets. Significant variation in performance was observed across subsets, with the top-performing submission achieving a 67.1 % gain for the HSN subset over random sampling and a gain of 8 % for the ATBFL subset. Top-ranking submissions combined multiple acquisition signals, and diversity-based selection outperformed pure uncertainty sampling. Furthermore, there is evidence that transitioning from diversity-based to uncertainty-based selection and explicitly reducing redundancy within acquisition batches improve model training. There is also initial evidence that larger acquisition batch sizes may be increasingly beneficial later in the labelling process.