Authors: Jasin Cekinmez, Addison J. Wu, Haotian Xia, Kyumin Andrew Shim, Anay Putty, Jinglin Xiao, Zhuohan Liu, Leo Liu, +1 more
Organizations: Princeton University · Rice University · UC Irvine · NYU · UC Santa Barbara
Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) can describe a scene, but can they act well within one? We study whether VLMs can make sound strategic decisions, using soccer as an objective testbed with quantifiably-valued actions. We introduce SportD, a dataset and evaluation consisting of 1421 decision scenarios across professional men's and women's soccer games, where a VLM must decide what action to take next. Models on average select the optimal action around 27% of the time, less often than the professional players, and capture markedly less of the value at stake. Furthermore, they exhibit a clear preference for safer actions, favoring lower-variance, lower-value choices that also make less physical progress toward goal. Frontier VLMs are better at estimating whether an action will succeed, placing the highest-success-probability action among their top choices in 72-85% of cases. Yet VLMs systematically conflate likelihood with value, assigning higher value to actions that are more likely to succeed (ρ=+0.30 to +0.52), despite no such relationship in the ground truth (ρ=−0.08). Modifying the deliberation instructions to encourage risk-taking brings the frontier models closer to the players' skill levels. SportD opens a new direction for rigorously evaluating physical strategic decision-making in VLMs, showing that careful decomposition of their choices can reveal the mechanisms underlying systematic biases such as risk aversion.
Vision-language models (VLMs) have recently shown strong potential in soccer video understanding. However, given the high complexity of soccer videos due to large viewpoint variations, rapid shot transitions, and cluttered scenes, it remains unclear on whether VLMs rely on meaningful visual evidence or exploit spurious correlations and shortcut learning. Existing evaluation protocols focus primarily on classification accuracy and do not assess visual grounding. To address this limitation, we introduce SoccerLens, a benchmark for grounded soccer video understanding. The benchmark contains annotated video segments spanning 13 common soccer events, with structured visual cues organized into three levels of semantic relevance. We further extend the attribution method of Chefer [arXiv:2103.15679] to jointly model spatial and temporal attention, and introduce evaluation metrics that measure whether model attention aligns with annotated cues or drifts toward spurious regions. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art soccer VLMs shows that, despite strong classification accuracy, current models fail to exceed 50% grounding performance even under the loosest cue definitions and consistently underutilize temporal information. These results reveal a substantial gap between predictive performance and true visual grounding, highlighting the need for grounded evaluation in complex spatio-temporal domains such as soccer.
Automated understanding of complex soccer scenarios from video remains a significant challenge for contemporary vision-language models (VLMs), which suffer from shallow cross-modal alignment and exhibit fundamental limitations in multi-step reasoning and coordinated tool integration. We present TreeSoc, a structured reasoning framework that reformulates soccer video question answering as a hierarchical search problem rather than a single-pass prediction. Specifically, TreeSoc employs a dynamic depth-first search (DFS) mechanism that decomposes complex queries into sequentially ordered sub-tasks, enabling iterative reasoning refinement through explicit intermediate states. This tree-structured decomposition naturally supports adaptive tool routing, wherein domain-specific modules are selectively activated and their outputs incorporated at each reasoning node to produce contextually grounded predictions. On SoccerBench, TreeSoc achieves state-of-the-art performance, with accuracies of 85.2%, 87.4%, and 82.2% on TextQA, ImageQA, and VideoQA, respectively. Additionally, TreeSoc further demonstrates strong cross-domain generalization, attaining 74.16% accuracy on NExT-QA. These results establish structured, tool-augmented tree reasoning as an effective paradigm for robust video understanding. Code is available at: https://github.com/thanhnhan29/TreeSoc.
Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on single-view video understanding benchmarks. However, sports videos involve dense occlusion, rapid motion, and complex interactions that are difficult to resolve from a single viewpoint. In practice, sports events are recorded from multiple camera angles, providing complementary evidence used by referees. Yet, no existing benchmark evaluates MLLMs on multi-view sports video understanding. To address this gap, we introduce SportMV-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark built from official match recordings, through a dedicated pipeline combining LLM-based generation, MLLM-based verification, and human filtering to ensure quality and consistency. SportMV-Bench containing 787 multi-view video bundles and 2592 question-answer pairs across three categories: Perception-Aware Recognition (PAR), Rule-aware Event Interpretation (REI), and Adjudicative Decision Reasoning(ADR). Our analysis shows that current MLLMs fail to effectively exploit multi-view information, with the bottlenecks lying in fine-grained visual perception and view selection rather than logical reasoning or domain knowledge. We propose SportMV-Agent, an agentic framework that orchestrates an iterative loop of active view selection, perception tool execution, and evidence-grounded reasoning, achieving a significant 14.46% relative improvement over the strongest MLLM baseline.