q-bio.PEJul 17, 2026

Approximating SPR Distance Between Phylogenetic Trees with Graph Neural Networks

Authors: Renata Martins CastanheiraMiguel BugalhoCátia Vaz

Organizations: ISEL – Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Portugal · ALGORITMI Research Center/CCPM, Portugal · INESC-ID Lisboa, Portugal

Abstract

Comparing phylogenetic tree topologies is essential for understanding epidemic dynamics, yet biologically meaningful distances such as the Subtree Prune and Regraft (SPR) distance are NP-hard to compute and intractable on large datasets. We investigate whether a Graph Neural Network (GNN) can approximate SPR distances in near-constant time per comparison after training. Our contributions are fourfold. First, we build and publicly release a dataset of 864 phylogenetic trees inferred with UPGMA and Neighbor-Joining over four bacterial species, spanning up to 9{,}500 isolates, together with 388 labelled tree pairs. Second, we establish a reproducible pre-processing pipeline including midpoint re-rooting, which reduces tree depth and supplies the rooting required for exact distance computation and for the model's root-based features. Third, we validate the supervision target: on small trees, where exact SPR is tractable, the unrooted phangorn::SPR.dist heuristic correlates almost perfectly with the exact rooted distance computed by rspr (Pearson 0.980.98--0.990.99), making it an excellent monotonic surrogate. Lastly, we train a Siamese Graph Isomorphism Network (GIN) regressor. In-distribution, i.e., held-out trees from the same species and size range as training, it explains roughly 87--90% of the variance (R20.87R^2 \approx 0.87 on a held-out split; 0.90±0.190.90 \pm 0.19 under stratified cross-validation), with about four times lower error than a mean-predictor baseline, and shows partial transfer to unseen species (R20.37R^2 \approx 0.37). Its main limitation is extrapolation to trees larger than those seen in training, where accuracy collapses. The released dataset and the validated heuristic versus exact relationship provide a reproducible basis for scaling learned SPR approximation.

Explore similar work

May 12, 2026q-bio.PE

Phylogenetic Tree Inference with Tropical Axial Attention

In this work, we introduce a Tropical Axial Attention neural reasoning architecture that replaces vanilla softmax dot-product attention with max-plus operators, inducing a piecewise-linear structure aligned with dynamic programming formulations. From multi-species sequence alignments, our model learns all possible pairwise distances and is trained using a combination of 1\ell_1 and tropical symmetric distance metric losses with an ultrametric violation penalty. We leverage the well known isomorphic relationship between the space of all phylogenetic trees with nn species and tropical Grassmannian to show that tropical attention provides a natural geometric framework for phylogenetic inference. On empirical DS1DS11DS1-DS11 alignments, where true trees are unknown, the tropical model produces distance matrices that are substantially closer to their BME-induced tree metrics than the baseline models. These results suggest that tropical attention is a useful geometric inductive bias for neural phylogenetic inference, especially under distribution shift and when tree-metric consistency is important.
Chris Teska, Kurt Pasque, Ruriko Yoshida +1
Oct 12, 2023q-bio.PE

PhyloGFN: Phylogenetic inference with generative flow networks

Phylogenetics is a branch of computational biology that studies the evolutionary relationships among biological entities. Its long history and numerous applications notwithstanding, inference of phylogenetic trees from sequence data remains challenging: the high complexity of tree space poses a significant obstacle for the current combinatorial and probabilistic techniques. In this paper, we adopt the framework of generative flow networks (GFlowNets) to tackle two core problems in phylogenetics: parsimony-based and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Because GFlowNets are well-suited for sampling complex combinatorial structures, they are a natural choice for exploring and sampling from the multimodal posterior distribution over tree topologies and evolutionary distances. We demonstrate that our amortized posterior sampler, PhyloGFN, produces diverse and high-quality evolutionary hypotheses on real benchmark datasets. PhyloGFN is competitive with prior works in marginal likelihood estimation and achieves a closer fit to the target distribution than state-of-the-art variational inference methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/zmy1116/phylogfn.
Mingyang Zhou, Zichao Yan, Elliot Layne +5
May 22, 2026cs.LG

Weisfeiler-Leman Is Incomplete on Simple Spectrum Graphs, so Canonicalize Them

Graphs with a simple spectrum admit cubic-time isomorphism testing, yet we prove that for every natural number kk, the kk-Weisfeiler-Leman (kk-WL) test cannot distinguish all non-isomorphic graphs with a simple spectrum. As the WL hierarchy upper-bounds the distinguishing power of widely-used Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), this incompleteness applies to all such GNNs, ruling out completeness for every kk-WL-aligned GNN family. To close this gap, we introduce PRiSM (Partition, Refine, Solve, Match), the first provably complete canonicalization of simple-spectrum eigendecompositions. PRiSM obtains the completeness guarantee that prior canonicalizations provably lack, and resolves the open problem of achieving complete expressivity on simple-spectrum graphs. When composed with DeepSets or a Transformer, PRiSM achieves universal approximation on simple-spectrum graphs, justifying the use of canonicalized Laplacian positional encodings. Empirically, PRiSM performs comparably to or outperforms existing spectral canonicalizations on graph regression, classification, and expressivity
Snir Hordan, Nadav Dym, Tim Seppelt