stat.MLJul 21, 2026

The Price of Hidden Curvature: An \widetildeΩ (d^{5/4} \sqrt{T}) Lower Bound for Bandit Convex Optimization

Authors: Nived Rajaraman

Organizations: Microsoft Research

Abstract

We establish a Ω~(d5/4T)\widetildeΩ(d^{5/4}\sqrt T) lower bound on the minimax expected regret of stochastic bandit convex optimization of 11-Lipschitz functions on the Euclidean ball. This presents the first nontrivial regret lower bound that grows faster than dTd\sqrt{T} for this problem, establishing that stochastic bandit convex optimization is fundamentally harder than linear bandits. The hard class of convex functions we construct takes the following form in dimension 2d2d: for an action a=(a1,a2)B22da = (a^1,a^2) \in \mathbb{B}^{2d}_2, each function is the scaled soft maximum of a "tube", r1Wa1r8εa22r^{-1} \| W^\star a^1 - \frac{r}{8\varepsilon} a^2 \|_2 (hyperparameterized by ε,r\varepsilon,r), and a squared distance function, 12a1u2212u22\frac12 \| a^1 - u^\star \|_2^2 - \frac12 \| u^\star \|_2^2. Here, WRd×dW^\star \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d} is an unknown linear transformation, and uRdu^\star \in \mathbb{R}^{d} is an unknown vector which must be learned to minimize the function. Observations are informative about uu^\star only when the learner's action lies near the tube determined by WW^\star, satisfying a28εrWa1a^2 \approx \frac{8\varepsilon}{r} W^\star a^1: thus the learner must either find this tube without knowing WW^\star, or spend observations learning useful directions of WW^\star. Formally, our regret analysis exploits this tradeoff by bounding the posterior spread of Fisher information matrices obtained under an adaptive sequence of actions. Together, these ingredients give a sample complexity lower bound of Ω~(d5/2/ε2)\widetildeΩ(d^{5/2}/\varepsilon^2) to find an ε\varepsilon-optimal action, which translates to an Ω~(d5/4T)\widetildeΩ (d^{5/4} \sqrt{T}) regret lower bound. We also extend this lower bound to the unconstrained setting where the action space is Rd\mathbb{R}^d.

Explore similar work

Sep 11, 2026cs.LG

Thompson Sampling for Non-Monotone Convex Ridge Bandits: Monotonicity Is Not Needed for Polynomial Regret

Bakhtiari, Lattimore and Szepesv'ari (COLT 2025) proved that Thompson sampling (TS) has Bayesian regret O~(d5/2n)\tilde O(d^{5/2}\sqrt n) for bandit convex optimisation with convex \emph{monotone} ridge losses f(x)=(\ipxθ)f(x)=\ell(\ip{x}{\theta}), and asked whether monotonicity of the link is necessary. We give a qualitative negative answer. For every prior on [0,1][0,1]-valued, 11-Lipschitz convex ridge losses with an arbitrary convex, possibly non-monotone, link, and for any fixed measurable selection of minimisers, exact-posterior TS has Bayesian regret O((d+1)4dnlog(e+ndmax{1,\diamK}))=O~(d9/2n)O\big((d+1)^4\sqrt{dn}\,\log(e+nd\max\{1,\diam K\})\big)=\tilde O(d^{9/2}\sqrt n). The monotone proof relies on a single-removal John-ellipsoid dichotomy; we show by an explicit twelve-point configuration that this dichotomy fails for non-monotone links, and replace it by an O(d2)O(d^2) cardinality bound for ``uninformative'' configurations. The bound uses a Boolean rounding argument: a 00-11 matrix within 1/(4r)1/(4r) in max-norm of a rank-rr matrix has rank at most 2r12r-1. We construct d(d+1)d(d+1) uninformative losses, showing that the cardinality bound is tight up to constants in the large-diameter-to-gap regime, and give a self-contained information-ratio-to-regret transfer that is uniform over fixed measurable selections. Whether the d5/2d^{5/2} dependence of the monotone case can be retained remains open.
Xuan Li
Jun 6, 2026cs.LG

Noise-Adaptive High-Probability Regret Bounds for Online Convex Optimization

We study high-probability regret bounds for online convex optimization (OCO) with strongly convex losses and establish three results that resolve open questions at the intersection of noise adaptivity, feedback structure, and constraint satisfaction. For the full-information setting with sub-Gaussian stochastic gradients, we prove a noise-adaptive high-probability regret bound in which the martingale deviation term scales with the noise level σσ rather than the gradient bound GG, yielding a multiplicative improvement of G/σG/σ over the classical Azuma-Hoeffding baseline. Our analysis introduces an exponential supermartingale argument that bypasses the bounded-difference requirement of Freedman's inequality, enabling direct treatment of unbounded sub-Gaussian noise without truncation artifacts. For bandit feedback, we prove a minimax lower bound: the high-probability regret scales linearly in log(1/δ)\log(1/δ), in contrast to the log(1/δ)\sqrt{\log(1/δ)} confidence cost under full information. This constitutes a formal separation in the confidence cost of strongly convex OCO across feedback models. Regarding constrained OCO with stochastic constraints satisfying a Slater condition, we provide simultaneous high-probability guarantees for both cumulative regret and long-run constraint violation, achieving O(Tlog(m/δ))\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T\log(m/δ)}) regret and O(T/(ζδ)+mTlog(m/δ))\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T}/(ζδ) + m\sqrt{T\log(m/δ)}) violation. Synthetic experiments corroborate all theoretical predictions.
Wentao Zhang, Yutong Zhang, Wentao Mo
Jan 20, 2026stat.ML

Small Gradient Norm Regret for Online Convex Optimization

This paper introduces a new problem-dependent regret measure for online convex optimization with smooth losses. The notion, which we call the GG^\star regret, depends on the cumulative squared gradient norm evaluated at the decision in hindsight. We show that the GG^\star regret strictly refines the existing LL^\star (small loss) regret, and that it can be arbitrarily sharper when the losses have vanishing curvature around the hindsight decision. We establish upper and lower bounds on the GG^\star regret and extend our results to dynamic regret and bandit settings. As a byproduct, we refine the existing convergence analysis of stochastic optimization algorithms in the interpolation regime. Some experiments validate our theoretical findings.
Wenzhi Gao, Chang He, Madeleine Udell