cs.LGJul 22, 2026

Asymptotically Optimal Regret for Reinforcement Learning without Horizon Dependence

Authors: Runlong ZhouZihan ZhangMaryam FazelSimon S. Du

Organizations: University of Washington. · Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. · §University of Washington. · ¶University of Washington.

Abstract

We study horizon-free regret minimization for finite-horizon time-homogeneous tabular Markov decision processes with SS states, AA actions, horizon HH, and per-trajectory total reward bounded by 11. We propose a new algorithm and prove a regret upper bound

O~(SAK+S8A3)\tilde O(\sqrt{SAK}+S^8A^3)

with failure probability δδ, where KK is the number of episodes and O~()\tilde O(\cdot) hides polylog(S,A,K,1/δ)\mathsf{poly}\log(S,A,K,1/δ). Thus, the regret is HH-free and asymptotically optimal, matching the contextual-bandit lower bound Ω(SAK)Ω(\sqrt{SAK}) up to logarithmic factors. This completely removes the logH\log H dependence from the previous O~(SAKlogH+S2AlogH)\tilde O(\sqrt{SAK\log H}+S^2A\log H) guarantee of Zhang et al. (2021), and drastically improves the prior best horizon-free regret O~(S9A3K)\tilde O(\sqrt{S^9A^3K}) of Zhang et al. (2022) asymptotically. The main technical difficulty is that the optimal value functions {Vh}h=1H\{V_h^*\}_{h=1}^H are time-inhomogeneous even though the transition kernel is time-homogeneous. A direct union bound over all value functions typically incurs an additional min{logH,S}\min\{\log H,S\} factor. We avoid this factor by (i) exploiting the monotonicity of VhV_h^* in hh and (ii) non-trivially projecting the value functions onto an SS-dimensional grid. Our analysis relies on three additional ingredients. First, we introduce a horizon-truncation argument that enables reward-based exploration and removes the cost of a separate reward-free exploration phase. Second, we design a cutting bonus that preserves both optimism and the monotonicity needed for planning. Third, we prove a new bound on total deviation for time-homogeneous MDPs, which controls the clipped variance terms in the cutting bonus with adjustable polynomial dependence on SS and without any dependence on HH. Together, these tools yield an asymptotically optimal horizon-free regret guarantee.

Explore similar work

Jul 31, 2026stat.ML

The Greedy Advantage in Finite-Horizon Bandits

Organizations increasingly rely on sequential experimentation to improve decision-making. While the multi-armed bandit literature has developed algorithms with strong asymptotic regret guarantees, many practical applications operate over finite and externally imposed horizons. Motivated by the finite-horizon setting, we develop a class of regularized greedy algorithms for multi-armed Bernoulli bandits. We derive the first finite-horizon regret envelopes for regularized greedy bandits, showing that finite-horizon regret decomposes into transient exploration costs and a suboptimal convergence term that decays exponentially with the regularization strength. This characterization yields principled calibration rules for the regularization parameters and, as a limiting case, sharper regret guarantees for the classical greedy policy. Across extensive numerical experiments, calibrated regularized greedy policies consistently match or outperform state-of-the-art algorithms. These results suggest that regularized greedy policies can provide an effective approach for finite-horizon bandit problems.
Kai Zhou, Michael Lingzhi Li, Kai Wang
May 19, 2026cs.AI

Minimax Optimal Variance-Aware Regret Bounds for Multinomial Logistic MDPs

We study reinforcement learning for episodic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) whose transitions are modelled by a multinomial logistic (MNL) model. Existing algorithms for MNL mixture MDPs yield a regret of O~(dH2T)\smash{\tilde{O}(dH^2\sqrt{T})} (Li et al., 2024), where dd is the feature dimension, HH the episode length, and TT the number of episodes. Inspired by the logistic bandit literature (Abeille et al., 2021; Faury et al., 2022; Boudart et al., 2026), we introduce a problem-dependent constant σˉ_T1/2\barσ\_T \leq 1/2, measuring the normalised average variance of the optimal downstream value function along the learner's trajectory. We propose an algorithm achieving a regret of O~(dH2σˉ_TT)\smash{\tilde{O}(dH^2\barσ\_T\sqrt{T})}, which recovers the existing bound in the worst case and improves upon it for structured MDPs. For instance, for KL-constrained robust MDPs, σˉ_T=O(H1)\barσ\_T = O(H^{-1}), reducing the horizon dependence by a factor HH. We further establish a matching Ω(dH2σˉ_TT)\smash{Ω(dH^2\barσ\_T\sqrt{T})} lower bound, proving minimax optimality (up to logarithmic factors) and fully characterising the regret complexity of MNL mixture MDPs for the first time.
Pierre Boudart, Pierre Gaillard, Alessandro Rudi
Feb 2, 2026cs.LG

Data- and Variance-dependent Regret Bounds for Online Tabular MDPs

This work studies online episodic tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) with known transitions and develops best-of-both-worlds algorithms that achieve refined data-dependent regret bounds in the adversarial regime and variance-dependent regret bounds in the stochastic regime. We quantify MDP complexity using a first-order quantity and several new data-dependent measures for the adversarial regime, including a second-order quantity and a path-length measure, as well as variance-based measures for the stochastic regime. To adapt to these measures, we develop algorithms based on global optimization and policy optimization, both built on optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader with log-barrier regularization. For global optimization, our algorithms achieve first-order, second-order, and path-length regret bounds in the adversarial regime, and in the stochastic regime, they achieve a variance-aware gap-independent bound and a variance-aware gap-dependent bound that is polylogarithmic in the number of episodes. For policy optimization, our algorithms achieve the same data- and variance-dependent adaptivity, up to a factor of the episode horizon, by exploiting a new optimistic QQ-function estimator. Finally, we establish regret lower bounds in terms of data-dependent complexity measures for the adversarial regime and a variance measure for the stochastic regime, implying that the regret upper bounds achieved by the global-optimization approach are nearly optimal.
Mingyi Li, Taira Tsuchiya, Kenji Yamanishi