math.OCJul 22, 2026

Lipschitzian SLLNs for random functions

Authors: Lai TianJohannes O. Royset

Abstract

We prove strong laws of large numbers for locally Lipschitz functions in the Lipschitz pseudometric. Our results hold under either a topological or a model-theoretic condition, with the latter encompassing functions jointly definable in o-minimal structures but extending substantially beyond this class. Applications include uniform convergence of limiting and Clarke subdifferentials and finite-sample identification of solutions. Consequently, we identify broad classes of functions for which the failure phenomena revealed by our previous negative results [Tian and Royset, arXiv:2511.16568, 2025] do not occur.

Explore similar work

Sep 2, 2026stat.ML

A Closed-Form Formula for Consistent Lipschitz Regression on Metric Spaces with Sparse Neural Network Realizations

Several classical machine-learning methods, such as KRRs and SVRs, are both computationally and analytically tractable since their estimators either admit closed-form expressions or are obtained by minimizing convex training objectives; neither feature is generally available for deep neural networks. We address this by introducing a simple closed-form ``two-stage'' compositional formula f^\hat{f} for reconstructing an unknown Lipschitz function f:XRf:\mathcal{X}\to \mathbb{R} on a metric space (X,ρ)(\mathcal X,ρ) from NN i.i.d. noisy observations. Our main result is a high-probability uniform (LL^{\infty}) recovery guarantee that jointly controls approximation and statistical errors while enjoying an optimization error of zero; in particular, we do not assume oracle access to an approximate ERM. Our secondary main results establish the optimality of our formula in three complementary senses. 1) Function space: On Ahlfors-regular metric spaces, the hypothesis class parameterized by our formula attains the optimal fat-shattering dimension. 2) Parameter space: Its dependence on the parameters is maximally numerically stable, in the sense that a smaller approximation error cannot be achieved with a smaller Lipschitz dependence on the model parameters. 3) Forward pass: Its dependence on the input is maximally regular, matching the Lipschitz constant of the target function ff. When X=[0,1]d\mathcal X=[0,1]^d is equipped with the \ell^\infty norm, f^\hat{f} admits algorithmic ReLU-MLP and exact ReLU-multi-head transformer realizations of depth O(log(N))\mathcal{O}(\log(N)) with O(N)\mathcal{O}(N) nonzero parameters.
Ruiyang Hong, Hrad Ghoukasian, Anastasis Kratsios
May 28, 2026stat.ML

Instance-dependent Stochastic Lipschitz bandit

We study the Lipschitz bandit problem, where a learner sequentially maximizes an unknown Lipschitz function ff over a domain X[0,1]d\mathcal{X} \subset [0,1]^d using noisy pointwise evaluations. Existing regret bounds are either worst-case, scaling as Θ~(Td+1/d+2)\tildeΘ \left ( T^{d+1/d+2}\right ), or adaptive via the zooming dimension dzd_z, yielding Θ~(Tdz+1/dz+2)\tildeΘ \left ( T^{d_z+1/d_z+2}\right ). However, such zooming-based guarantees are only partially instance-dependent, as they depend solely on the asymptotic growth of near-optimal level sets and fail to capture finer structural properties of ff. We provide an analysis and an algorithm that characterizes the regret through integrals of the suboptimality gap of ff over its level sets. This yields regret bounds that adapt to the local growth of level sets, rather than only their asymptotic behavior. As a corollary, when the set of maximizers has dimension d>0d^\star>0, we obtain improved adaptive rates of order O~(Tdz+1/max(dz,d)+2)\tilde{\mathcal{O}} \left ( T^{d_z+1 / \max(d_z,d^\star)+2}\right ) strictly improving over classical zooming bounds in this regime. Finally, we extend our analysis to the full-information setting (Lipschitz experts) and show how some of the regularity assumptions can be relaxed.
Marius Potfer, Vianney Perchet
May 29, 2026math.ST

Improved Guarantees for Langevin Monte Carlo with Average Smoothness

We establish improved nonasymptotic bounds for Langevin Monte Carlo in the strongly log-concave setting, when the error is measured by the Wasserstein distance. The main result shows that the discretization error is governed by an average coordinate-wise smoothness constant, rather than by the usual global smoothness constant. The proof is short and probabilistic, and relies on a refined use of the synchronous coupling. We further show that the same ideas lead to improved bounds for variable step sizes, for potentials whose Laplacian is Lipschitz-continuous, and for finite-sum problems sampled by stochastic-gradient Langevin dynamics with fixed point control variates. In the Laplacian-smooth case, the usual Hessian-Lipschitz contribution is replaced by a weaker trace-type third-order smoothness quantity. In the finite-sum setting, the resulting SGLD bound improves the dependence on the root mean square smoothness of the component functions. Applications to generalized linear models with Gaussian design show that these refinements can yield substantial, dimension-dependent improvements over previously known bounds, especially for correlated covariates.
Arnak S. Dalalyan, Avetik Karagulyan