Toward Goal-Agnostic Joint-Embedding Predictive Control of Partial Differential Equations

Joint-embedding predictive (JEPA-style) objectives learn representations by predicting future latents. In doing so they can discard features that are exogenous (uncontrollable by the agent) yet control-relevant, even when those features are trivially encodable. This occurs because the objective optimizes temporal predictability rather than control-relevance. We isolate this failure mode in a controlled 2x2 experimental design that varies feature controllability and relevance independently, using a predictability knob that decouples a feature's temporal predictability from its control-relevance. Comparing six objectives: reconstruction, JEPA, action-conditioned JEPA, controllability-based JEPA, inverse dynamics under a random policy, and reward-grounded JEPA, we observe that all evaluated reward-free predictive objectives leave the exogenous control-relevant feature near chance accuracy, while a reward-grounded variant retains it selectively. The remedy is label-efficient and robust: as little as 2% of reward-labeled transitions recovers the feature, the effect holds across two environments with different surface forms, and it persists across latent dimensions from 16 to 1024. Comparing the learned latent geometry against bisimulation theory's prediction, the JEPA latent realizes only a small fraction of the class separation a supervised reference attains.

We propose PhyLatent, a dynamics-relevant training objective for JointEmbedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) world models. Our key observation is that preventing global latent collapse does not ensure that a representation preserves physical states and action consequences. We identify three failure modes in JEPA world models: physical invariance collapse, physical identifiability collapse, and counterfactual dynamics collapse. PhyLatent addresses them through three training pathways: physical invariance, physical identifiability, and counterfactual dynamics, implemented with physical state grounding, future representation alignment, static visual invariance, counterfactual branch separation, and latent denoising. On OGBench-Cube, PhyLatent reduces the three failure rates from 15.60%, 6.71%, and 8.41% to 7.53%, 0.95%, and 4.62%, respectively, and improves model predictive control (MPC) success from 70.0% to 78.1%. With the same architecture and planner, it further improves success from 81.0% to 98.0% on TwoRooms and remains competitive on Reacher and PushT. These results show that global non-collapse alone is insufficient for learning a reliable JEPA worldmodel state space.

Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) learn world models by predicting in representation space rather than reconstructing pixels, making them a natural backbone for latent model predictive control from offline demonstration logs. JEPA-style training optimizes short-horizon latent prediction, whereas planning requires a multi-step ranking of imagined futures by goal progress. Prior JEPA planners often inherit that ranking from embedding geometry, typically latent Euclidean distance, which arises as a byproduct of representation learning rather than as a progress cost mined from the logs. We propose Temporal-Distance-JEPA, which retains the LeWM encoder--predictor backbone and mines a directed temporal cost from reward-free trajectories: same-trajectory step order supplies positive targets, cross-trajectory pairs act as heuristic negatives, and a rollout-consistency term matches the planner horizon. The mined supervision serves two roles: as the deployed planning cost when progress is topological, and as a representation signal that improves Euclidean planning when contact geometry dominates. Under locked evaluation, deploying the mined cost raises Two-Room success to 100.0% versus LeWM's 97.4%, while shared Euclidean planning on the same temporally trained checkpoint raises OGB-Cube by 14.2 points over LeWM and improves Push-T. Against LeWM and the concurrent RC-aux baseline under locked evaluation, Temporal-Distance-JEPA matches or exceeds both methods on every environment. Ablations show that the directed head, cross-trajectory negatives, and rollout consistency each contribute. Temporal-Distance-JEPA narrows the train--plan gap for JEPA world-model planners by discovering temporal progress structure in offline logs and co-designing cost form with plan-time deployment. Code is available at https://github.com/HKBU-KnowComp/Temporal-Distance-JEPA.