Endpoint Replay: Compressing the Recency Buffer in Deep Reinforcement Learning

Learning from a stream of experience as it arrives, also known as streaming learning, is a core part of natural learning. However, reliable streaming learning has remained a persistent challenge in modern deep reinforcement learning (RL). Instead, most deep RL algorithms learn from old experience by storing past interactions in a buffer. We show that both classical streaming RL, such as Q-learning and actor-critic, when used with deep neural networks, and batch deep RL, such as PPO, SAC, and DQN, when adapted to the streaming setting, often fail to learn. Across 58 Atari games and 50 continuous-control tasks, we find that these methods, in aggregate, perform close to random policies despite extensive task-specific hyperparameter searches. We call this pattern stream barrier. Here, we introduce Stream-X, a shared recipe for streaming deep RL algorithms that combines signal normalization, representation stabilization, and controlled parameter updates. By applying Stream-X to several base streaming RL algorithms, we provide the first family of deep RL algorithms to overcome the stream barrier. Using one prescribed hyperparameter configuration per algorithm across tasks, Stream-X substantially improves aggregate performance, often on par with batch RL algorithms. Beyond these benchmarks, we demonstrate learning with Stream-X algorithms under nonstationarity and resource constraints. Stream-AC, one of the Stream-X algorithms, repeatedly recovers performance across alternating floor-friction regimes in simulation, outperforming the evaluated PPO and SAC baselines. It also learns a heading tracking task on a robot using proprioceptive and visual features from the on-board camera in a naturally changing laboratory environment. Stream-Q learns a Pong game from pixels directly on an ESP32-S3 microcontroller, a device with limited compute and memory.

Uncertainty estimation provides promising capabilities for reinforcement learning (RL) agents. Notably, estimating uncertainty can reduce the training time and enable agents to obtain greater rewards over time by exploiting information related to whether an action would facilitate exploration of portions of an environment that are well-known versus those that are relatively unknown. In this work, we propose a novel formulation of the experience replay buffer commonly used in RL that we call uncertainty-driven replay memory (UDRM), which entails an update scheme for internally stored memories based on uncertainty estimates obtained by an RL model during training. In contrast to existing forms of RL, which typically use temporal difference error or the distribution of transitions to update the replay memory buffer and train RL controllers, our scheme biases the memory buffer to store more uncertain transitions that will improve an RL agent's generalization throughout training. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed uncertainty-aware replay buffer enables an RL agent to obtain higher rewards during training compared to other existing uncertainty-aware RL frameworks.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has delivered strong results in domains such as Atari and Go, but it still suffers from high sample cost and weak transfer beyond the training setting. A common response is to reuse information from previously trained models through transfer, distillation, ensemble methods, or federated training instead of learning each target task from random initialization. The literature on these mechanisms is fragmented, and published comparisons are hard to interpret because tasks, baselines, and compute budgets differ. This paper presents a PRISMA-guided systematic review of empirical studies on pretrained knowledge reuse in DRL. Starting from 589 records retrieved from IEEE Xplore, the ACM Digital Library, and citation tracing, we screened 570 unique records and assessed 89 full texts. After applying the final eligibility criteria, 15 empirical studies remained in the main synthesis. We analyzed them qualitatively across three factors: source-target similarity, diversity among reused models, and the fairness of comparisons against from-scratch baselines. Three patterns recur across the surviving corpus. First, positive results are concentrated in settings where source and target tasks share substantial structure or where the method includes an explicit gating or alignment mechanism. Second, evidence for ensembles and federated aggregation is promising but sparse and mostly limited to narrow settings. Third, compute-matched comparisons are rare, which weakens claims about efficiency gains over stronger single-agent baselines. The paper contributes a narrower and internally consistent review scope, a study-level synthesis of empirical evidence, and a provisional independence spectrum that should be treated as a hypothesis for future benchmarking rather than a validated metric.