cs.CRJul 28, 2026

Lilith: Backdoor Generalization under Training-Inference Trigger Shift

Authors: Zhou FengJiahao ChenChunyi ZhouYuan SuTianyu DuYuwen PuJianhai ChenJinbao Li+1 more

Abstract

Machine-learning services increasingly rely on public data, third-party providers, and outsourced training, creating opportunities for data-poisoning attacks that implant persistent malicious behavior while preserving benign utility. However, existing backdoor studies largely evaluate exact trigger reuse, training-exposed trigger diversity, or variations along predefined transformation axes. They therefore leave a critical blind spot: whether a backdoor learned from one training-time trigger can generalize to an inference-time trigger family absent from victim training. We formulate this problem as backdoor generalization under training--inference trigger shift and introduce Lilith, a black-box anchor-to-family framework. Using only disjoint surrogate resources, Lilith first induces a compact target-side vulnerability with a single training anchor, then constructs a bounded inference-only family that preserves the anchor-induced representation geometry. We characterize this mechanism through anchor clearance and family reach, deriving sufficient conditions for family-wise target preservation under local regularity and bounded surrogate--victim discrepancy. Experiments across datasets, architectures, poisoning rates, and defenses show that Lilith achieves high family-wise attack success with limited utility degradation and a small trigger generalization gap. Additional analyses show that family activation depends on representation alignment rather than the proposal mechanism, exposing a broader threat overlooked by exact-trigger evaluation.

Explore similar work

Jun 2, 2026cs.CL

Backdoor Unlearning Generalization: A Path Toward the Removal of Unknown Triggers in LLMs

Backdoor attacks in Large Language Models (LLMs) are a growing security concern, where models can generate adversary-chosen content. Existing defenses target backdoors one at a time and typically require knowledge of the trigger, leaving the defender at a structural disadvantage when unknown backdoors may exist in a model. We show that backdoor neutralization through unlearning generalizes across backdoors: training a model to ignore a single trigger can also suppress other backdoors that were never explicitly targeted. We study this phenomenon across three model families, whose backdoors were injected via pretraining or continual pretraining, by analyzing the models obtained after removing one backdoor at a time. To understand why unlearning certain backdoors induces the suppression of others, we introduce the Cross Activation Shift Distance, to quantify the distance between model changes induced by different trainings. Our results open a new direction for LLM safety as defenders could deliberately inject controlled backdoors and then remove them, leveraging cross-backdoor transfer to also suppress unknown backdoors that an attacker may have previously introduced in the model.
Lisa Bouger, Théo Lasnier, Philippe Loubet Moundi +2
May 2, 2026cs.CR

Checkerboard: A Simple, Effective, Efficient and Learning-free Clean Label Backdoor Attack with Low Poisoning Budget

Backdoor attacks threaten the deep learning supply chain by poisoning a small fraction of the training data so that a model behaves normally on clean inputs but misclassifies trigger-carrying inputs to an attacker-chosen target class. Clean-label backdoor attacks are especially dangerous because poisoned samples remain label-consistent and are therefore harder to detect. Yet existing clean-label attacks typically rely on expensive optimization, surrogate-model training, or nontrivial data access. We present Checkerboard, a theoretically grounded, learning-free clean-label backdoor attack that is effective, efficient, and simple to implement. From a linear separability formulation, we derive a checkerboard trigger in closed form, removing the need for surrogate-model training and trigger optimization. For texture-rich datasets, we introduce Complexity-driven Sample Selection, which uses only target-class data to improve trigger-to-background contrast by selecting low-complexity images for poisoning. Across four benchmark datasets, Checkerboard outperforms 8 baseline attacks and achieves state-of-the-art performance under low poisoning budgets. For example, on CIFAR-10, under a trigger perturbation budget of 10/25510/255, poisoning 20 training samples achieves 99.99%99.99\% Attack Success Rate (ASR). On ImageNet-100, a poisoning rate of only 0.46%0.46\% yields over 94%94\% ASR without degrading clean accuracy. The proposed attack also remains effective against state-of-the-art backdoor defenses and shows strong resistance to adaptive defenses.
Yi Yang, Jinyang Huang, Binbin Liu +5
May 21, 2026cs.LG

When Stronger Triggers Backfire: A High-Dimensional Theory of Backdoor Attacks

Backdoor poisoning attacks behave counter-intuitively in high dimensions: stronger training triggers can help the defender. We study regularised generalised linear models on Gaussian-mixture data in the proportional regime (p/nκp/n \to κ), varying the training trigger strength αα against a fixed test trigger. Three phenomena emerge: (i) clean test accuracy increases with αα; (ii) attack success peaks at a finite αα and then declines; and (iii) the most damaging trigger direction is the minimum eigenvector of the data covariance. We prove all three results in closed form for the squared loss, and extend (i) and (ii) to general convex GLM losses via a Gaussian-proxy fixed-point system. We identify a finite-sample noise floor proportional to κκ as the mechanism behind (i), invisible to classical npn \gg p analysis. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and Gaussian surrogates match the theory closely; ResNet-18 experiments show the same phenomena beyond the convex setting.
Donald Flynn, Hadas Yaron Goldhirsh, Jonathan P. Keating +1