Face and Voice Cross-modal Association with Learning Convex Feature Embedding
Authors: Taewan Kim, Jiwoo Kang
Organizations: 1Data Science Major, Dongduk Women’s University, Seoul, 02748, South Korea. · 2*Division of Artificial Intelligence Engineering, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, 04310, South Korea.
Abstract
Face-and-voice association learning is one of the most challenging tasks in deep learning. In this paper, we propose a simple but powerful cross-modal feature embedding method for the association of faces and voices. Previous work has studied cross-modal association tasks to establish the correlation between voice clips and facial images. These works have addressed cross-modal discrimination but underestimate the importance of handling heterogeneity in inter-modal features between audio and video, resulting in a lot of false positives and false negatives. To tackle the problem, the proposed method learns the embeddings of cross-modal features by making another feature exist between cross-modal features, facilitating the voice and face features of the same person to be embedded in a convex hull. Moreover, the incorporation of cross-modal attention mechanisms with convex embedding techniques represents a highly effective strategy for the attenuation of false positives and false negatives, accomplished via the minimization of inter-class discrepancies. We exhaustively evaluated our method for cross-modal verification, matching, and retrieval tasks on the large-scale VoxCeleb dataset. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves notable improvements over existing state-of-the-art methods.
A single embedding space that covers text, images, video, and audio lets one index serve every query a user can pose. Embedding models built on vision-language backbones now lead text/image/video retrieval benchmarks but lack audio entirely, while audio-text retrieval is led by specialist systems that serve no other modality. We present the Fusion Embedding family, which adds audio to a frozen vision-language embedding base whose parameters are never updated: generation 1 (fusion-embedding-1) trains only a 16.4M-parameter connector between a frozen audio tower and the frozen base, and generation 2 (fusion-embedding-2) adds modality-gated deep adapters (44.2M parameters) whose branch never executes on text, image, or video inputs: their outputs are bit-for-bit those of the released base, verified after every training run. Because the base already binds text, images, and video, aligning audio to text alone makes audio-image retrieval emerge, with zero paired audio-visual training data. Alongside the recipe we map its design space with controlled negative results (rewriting training captions with an LLM, substituting a leaderboard-stronger audio tower, and widening the connector each reduce retrieval) and with training-protocol findings that we expect to transfer to any frozen decoder-LM embedding backbone. Both generations train in hours on a single GPU. Weights, code, and the evaluation harness are openly released.
Abdul Basit Tonmoy, Kazi Fardinul Hoque, Md. Shahrier Islam Arham +1
The choice between cross-attention and concatenation for multimodal fusion remains governed by practitioner intuition rather than principled understanding. In this paper, we demonstrate that feature alignment quality, not data scale alone, is the primary determinant of which fusion strategy excels. Through controlled experiments on Flickr8k using two feature extraction backbones (ResNet18 and CLIP ViT-B/32), we show that concatenation outperforms cross-attention by 4.1-5.1 percentage points across all tested scales (2048-16384 samples) when features are pre-aligned by a vision-language pretraining objective. We provide a theoretical explanation grounded in sample complexity analysis: concatenation requires O(d_v + d_t) samples to learn its fusion projection, while cross-attention requires O(d_v * d_t) samples to learn bilinear attention weights, over 256 times as many for 512-dimensional CLIP features. When features are already aligned, the approximation error gap between the two methods vanishes, and concatenation's sample efficiency dominates at all practical dataset sizes. An alignment degradation study confirms a monotonic trend: as feature alignment degrades, concatenation's advantage grows from 1.3% to 2.8%. These findings provide a principled decision framework for fusion method selection in multimodal systems, with direct implications for the design of Multimodal Large Language Models.
When retrieving a person from a video archive by voice and face, should the system be multimodal or not? In real-world broadcast archives, unlike curated benchmarks, a target may be heard but unseen, seen but unheard, or both. Fusing scores from an absent modality injects noise, degrading precision below the best unimodal system. We propose a query-adaptive framework that detects active modalities via cross-modal score consistency: when both modalities are active, files retrieved by one also score highly on the other; this agreement breaks down when a modality is absent. Classifiers driven by these cross-modal features achieve 89% detection accuracy. On the BBC Rewind corpus (with over 12,000 broadcast videos) the adaptive system attains 94.2% P@1, outperforming speaker-only (82.9%), face-only (93.4%), and fixed fusion (90.0%), recovering 64% of the gap to an oracle with ground-truth modality labels (96.6%).