Generated Images Are Easier to Forget: A Machine Unlearning Perspective for Synthetic Image Detection

The rapid advancement in generative AI models has enabled the creation of photorealistic images. At the same time, there are growing concerns about the potential misuse and dangers of generated content, as well as a pressing need for effective AI-generated image detectors. However, current training-based detection techniques are typically computationally costly and can hardly be generalized to unseen data domains, while training-free methods fall short in detection performance. To bridge this gap, we propose a search-based method employing data embedding sensitivity in intermediate layers to detect AI-generated images. Given a set of real and AI-generated images, our method examines the similarity between original image embeddings and perturbed image embeddings, and detects AI-generated images based on the similarity. We examine the proposed method on two comprehensive benchmarks: GenImage and Forensics Small. Our method exhibits improved performance across different datasets compared to both training-free and training-based state-of-the-art methods. On average, our method achieves the largest performance gain on the Forensics Small benchmark by 39.61% compared to the best training-free method and 5.14% compared to the best training-based method in AUROC score.

The realism of images generated by multimodal large language models (MLLMs), such as GPT Image2 and Nano Banana2, has improved rapidly in recent years. Compared with early generative models, current models have made clear progress in text rendering. They can produce high-quality images that closely resemble real-world application scenarios. The enhanced generation capabilities of current MLLMs pose increasingly severe challenges to AI-generated image detection. Detection is no longer limited to identifying obvious artifacts left by early generators. Instead, it requires systematic and realistic benchmarks for the new generation of generated content. However, most existing benchmarks are still built around early generative models and cannot fully evaluate the forensic challenges introduced by high-quality and multi-form generated images. To address this gap, this paper constructs a benchmark dataset for detecting images generated by MLLMs. The benchmark covers several realistic application scenarios and adopts three generation protocols to simulate direct generation, reference-based reconstruction, and local editing. Based on this benchmark, we evaluate detector degradation from traditional scenarios to MLLM-generated images and analyze false positive rates and false negative rates across three sample types, revealing the failure modes of existing methods. We further propose a structural-artifact-prior-guided dual-stream prompt framework (SAP-DSP) as a strong baseline. SAP-DSP uses dual-stream prompt learning and structure-aware routing fusion to improve representation learning. Extensive experiments show that the proposed benchmark exposes the performance degradation of existing detectors on high-quality generated images, while SAP-DSP achieves more stable detection results on this benchmark. Our code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/xbrainnet/SAP-DSP.

The rapid evolution of generative image models challenges existing AI-generated image detectors, particularly in open-world settings with unseen generators. Recent training-free approaches measure robustness gaps in frozen vision foundation models (VFMs), detecting fakes via perturbation-induced embedding drift. However, these methods rely on fixed invariance geometry inherited from pretraining and lack principled adaptation to the detection task. We instead formulate AI-generated image detection as learning a structured invariance manifold of real images under one-class supervision. Building upon a frozen VFM, we introduce lightweight projection heads that decompose representation space into complementary robust and fragile subspaces. The robust subspace is explicitly trained to suppress variations induced by physically plausible imaging transformations, approximating tangent directions of a real-image manifold, while the fragile subspace retains sensitivity to edit-like perturbations. A structured ordering margin enforces hierarchical separation between physical invariance and edit-induced variability, enabling detection as a margin-violation test relative to the learned manifold. At inference, multi-scale patch-wise drift under both transformation families yields a dual-channel invariance signature and interpretable localization. Extensive experiments demonstrate strong open-world generalization across unseen generators and resolutions, consistently outperforming training-free robustness-based baselines while providing interpretable invariance-violation maps.