Organizations: College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210024, China · State Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210024, China · Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geospatial Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, 49931, United States · Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CN, Netherlands · Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, 80309, United States · Shanghai Research Institute of Building Science Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201108, China
This paper presents an interpretable machine-learning framework for predicting the splitting strength (ST) of asphalt concrete and supporting data-driven mixture design. A database consisting of 296 samples was established, and 14 input variables related to asphalt properties, aggregate gradation, and fiber characteristics were selected for modeling. Six machine-learning models, namely TabPFN, ANN, SVR, RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM, were developed and compared. Hyperparameter optimization was performed for five models using NSGA-II, while TabPFN was directly applied with its default configuration. The results show that all six models achieved satisfactory predictive capability, whereas TabPFN delivered the best overall performance on the testing set, with the lowest RMSE of 0.28, MAE of 0.21, MAPE of 18.01%, MAD of 0.14, the highest R^2 of 0.88, and the highest composite score of 0.91. SHAP analysis further revealed that nine dominant variables accounted for 92.0% of the total average contribution, among which Ag9.5, FT, Ag4.75, AC, and Du were the most influential. In addition, favorable parameter ranges for improving ST were quantified, such as Ag9.5 < 66.8%, Ag4.75 < 45.0%, AC < 5.4 wt.%, AV < 3.6%, and Du > 134.7 cm. Finally, a GUI platform integrating prediction and SHAP-based explanation was developed to improve the accessibility and practical applicability of the proposed framework.
Feature attribution analysis is critical for interpreting machine learning models and supporting reliable data-driven decisions. However, feature attribution measures often exhibit stochastic variation: different train--test splits, random seeds, or model-fitting procedures can produce substantially different attribution values and feature rankings. This paper proposes a framework for incorporating stochastic nature of feature attribution and a robust attribution metric, RoSHAP, for stable feature ranking based on the SHAP metric. The proposed framework models the distribution of feature attribution scores and estimates it through bootstrap resampling and kernel density estimation. We show that, under mild regularity conditions, the aggregated feature attribution score is asymptotically Gaussian, which greatly reduces the computational cost of distribution estimation. The RoSHAP summarizes the distribution of SHAP into a robust feature-ranking criterion that simultaneously rewards features that are active, strong, and stable. Through simulations and real-data experiments, the proposed framework and RoSHAP outperform standard single-run attribution measures in identifying signal features. In addition, models built using RoSHAP-selected features achieve predictive performance comparable to full-feature models while using substantially fewer predictors. The proposed RoSHAP approach improves the stability and interpretability of machine learning models, enabling reliable and consistent insights for analysis.
Establishing quantitative relationships among mix design, raw material properties, curing conditions, and performance remains a long-standing challenge in cementitious materials, particularly for alkali-activated materials with variable precursor and activator chemistry. Here, we curated the largest literature-derived alkali-activated slag (AAS) dataset to date, comprising over 3100 compressive strength records, 155 chemically distinct ground granulated blast-furnace slags (GGBSs), and 24 attributes incorporating precursor chemistry, fineness, and reactivity. Multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms were benchmarked across progressively enriched feature scenarios, demonstrating that integrating GGBS compositions, fineness, curing conditions, and specimen geometry improves predictive performance. The average metal oxide dissociation energy (AMODE), a physically interpretable representation of precursor reactivity, provides a compact alternative descriptor to explicit oxide compositions while enabling comparable predictive performance. Model interpretation revealed physically consistent trends from heterogeneous data, including non-monotonic effects of Na2O dosage and silicate modulus, reduced predicted strength at higher water content and larger specimen size, and coupled oxide-level effects more coherently represented by AMODE than by individual oxide contents. Statistically constrained design space exploration reveals reactivity-dependent trade-offs among strength, embodied CO2 emissions, and cost. The design maps identify high-strength regions with substantially lower CO2 emissions than OPC-based references at similar cost. Overall, this work demonstrates how reactivity-informed ML can extract physically meaningful trends from heterogeneous AAS data and guide source-dependent binder design. The curated dataset is publicly accessible to support advances in cement and concrete research.
We present an interpretable machine learning pipeline to decompose Cross-Sectional Equity Return Predictability into auditable factor contribution. We apply an XGBoost model with TreeSHAP attribution and conduct stress testing on 3632 Chinese A-share stocks from 2009 until 2019. Using 60-month, rolling windows over 55 months of out-of-sample data, XGBoost obtains a mean AUC of 0.547 and +2.38%/month (Newey-West t = 5.94; Annualized Sharpe 2.23) long-short spread for the top vs bottom quintiles. This alpha is persistent after adjusting for the Carhart four-factor model (+2.31%/month; t = 7.48). SHAP Decomposition indicates that behavioral signals (turnover and momentum) account for 58.2% of predictive attribution compared to 10.7% for valuation ratios, on average, across 55 industry groups. Ablation analysis serves to cross-validate this ranking and provides evidence that SHAP and ablation diverge in a manner that highlights feature substitutability structure that is largely invisible to either method used in isolation.