Same Semantics, Different Paths: Self-Improving Alignment for Vision-Text Compression

Visual text compression (VTC) promises efficient long-context processing by rendering text into an image and re-encoding it with a vision-language model, often producing $3$--$20\times$ fewer decoder tokens than subword tokenization. Yet token savings do not translate predictably into downstream utility: on some tasks the visual path matches or exceeds the text path, on others it collapses, and the compression ratio itself does not predict which regime will occur. The missing quantity is therefore not another summary of efficiency, but a principled measure of task-relevant information loss induced by visual encoding. We address this problem by formulating VTC in the language of measure transport. Treating text and visual tokens as empirical probability measures, we show that the ViT patch encoder induces a push-forward map whose transport cost decomposes into a precision cost from within-patch aggregation and a coverage cost from cross-patch fragmentation. Both terms are estimable from downstream-label-free probes. This formulation yields two operational consequences: a downstream-label-free routing criterion that selects whether to use the visual path for a given input or benchmark instance, and a transport-informed foveation mechanism that re-encodes high-cost regions at higher resolution. Across $24$ NLP datasets at Qwen3-4B, our label-free rule matches the per-dataset oracle on $17/24$ datasets ($70.8\%$), and improves the average task score by $+3.3\%$ with $-10.3\%$ average tokens relative to a pure-LLM.

Vision Language Models (VLMs) offer the exciting possibility of processing text as rendered images, bypassing the need for tokenizing the text into long token sequences. Since VLM image encoders map fixed-size images to a fixed number of visual tokens, varying rendering resolution provides a fine-grained compression knob. However, accuracy deteriorates quickly as compression increases: characters shrink below the vision encoder's effective resolution, making them indistinguishable. To address this, we propose LensVLM, an inference framework and post-training recipe that enables VLMs to scan compressed images, then selectively expand only the relevant images to their uncompressed form via learned tools. Building on Qwen3.5-9B-Base, LensVLM maintains accuracy comparable to the full-text upper bound at 4.3x effective compression and outperforms retrieval-based, text- and visual-compression baselines up to 10.1x effective compression across seven text QA benchmarks. LensVLM also generalizes to multimodal document and code understanding tasks, with the accuracy gain over baselines growing as compression increases. Our analysis validates this approach: training makes visual compression robust to rendering choices, and as compression grows the model increasingly relies on expanded content rather than unreliable visual reading. The analysis also yields practical tool-choice guidance: text expansion is preferable for rendered text, while high-resolution image expansion suits native documents whose layout cues carry task-relevant information.

Recent visual-text compression (VTC) methods, typified by DeepSeek-OCR, report impressive high token compression ratios for long-context modeling tasks by leveraging text-to-image rendering. However, existing evaluation protocols heavily rely on downstream task performance. Such evaluation metrics fail to accurately measure text preservation due to the strong inherent linguistic priors of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). In this work, we introduce a new evaluation framework that decouples MLLMs' capabilities to faithfully assess VTC quality. Within this framework, we further introduce the ZeroSense Benchmark to ensure low semantic correlation of testing samples. By eliminating textual dependencies, our benchmark guarantees that the evaluation results are purely reflective of VTC quality, unaffected by the semantic inference capabilities of downstream models. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that VTC quality and downstream task accuracy diverge significantly, highlighting the necessity of our decoupled evaluation framework.