math.STAug 3, 2026

Beyond Modern Asymptotics for Log-Likelihood Ratios in Logistic Regression

Authors: Hugo ChardonReese PathakNikita Zhivotovskiy

Organizations: Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley · School of Operations Research and Information Engineering (ORIE), Cornell University

Abstract

We characterize the finite sample behavior of the log-likelihood ratio statistic in binary logistic regression, uniformly over both the design and the target parameter. For nd3n\geq d\geq 3, we determine, up to universal constants, its worst case (1δ)(1-δ) quantile over all fixed collections of design vectors and all target parameters:

dlog(end)+log(1δ).d\log\left(\frac{e n}{d}\right)+\log\left(\frac{1}δ\right).

This is a nonasymptotic analogue of the Wilks χd2χ^2_d phenomenon and requires no regularity assumptions on the design. The low dimensional cases exhibit unusual behavior. The worst case quantile in dimension d=2d=2 is sharply of order

logloglogn+log(1δ).\log\log\log n+\log\left(\frac{1}δ\right).

The worst case quantile in dimension d=1d=1 is of order log(1/δ)\log(1/δ), with no dependence on nn. Finally, i.i.d. Gaussian design vectors recover the classical Wilks scale. In the regime nd+log(1/δ)n\gtrsim d+\log(1/δ), we prove the sharp bound

d+log(1δ).d+\log\left(\frac{1}δ\right).

Unlike existing asymptotic results, our bounds are uniform over the target parameter, which may depend on nn, dd, and δδ.

Explore similar work

Jun 19, 2026stat.ML

Finite-Sample Performance of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression with Gaussian Design

We consider the parameter estimation problem in logistic regression with Gaussian design: the estimation of a fixed unknown parameter θRdθ^*\in \mathbb{R}^d (θ21\|θ^*\|_2\ge 1) from nn i.i.d. samples {(xi,yi)}i=1n\{(x_i,y_i)\}_{i=1}^n, where xiN(0,Id)x_i\sim N(0,I_d) and yixiBernoulli(1/(1+exp(xiθ)))y_i|x_i \sim {\rm Bernoulli}(1/(1+\exp(-x_i^\top θ^*))). Our main aim is to characterize the finite-sample estimation performance and convergence behavior of gradient descent (GD) on the maximum likelihood objective (i.e., the logistic loss). Under small O(1)O(1) stepsize and 00 initialization, we show that GD linearly converges to a small neighborhood of θθ^* achieving an 2\ell_2 error of order O(θ25d/n)O(\sqrt{\|θ^*\|_2^5d/n}). This substantially goes beyond existing theoretical results that lack non-asymptotic estimation error rate and exhibit much slower parameter convergence. We also establish a faster local linear convergence to the same statistical error under a large Θ(θ2)Θ(\|θ^*\|_2) stepsize. The main technical component is to show that the gradient of the logistic loss satisfies a certain approximate invertibility condition (AIC). To that end, we uniformly control the deviation of the gradient from its population counterpart by covering and peeling arguments, and then show that the population GD is a contraction by a delicate analysis based on the eigenvalues of population Hessian matrices. Finally, we build upon the recent work Matsumoto and Mazumdar (2025) and devise a novel efficient estimator that attains a sharper rate in high dimensions. This indicates that the existing non-asymptotic guarantees exhibit sub-optimal dependence on θ2\|θ^*\|_2, and that in many regimes Θ(θ2d/n)Θ(\sqrt{\|θ^*\|_2d/n}) is the tight estimation error rate. Numerical examples are provided to corroborate our theoretical results.
Junren Chen, Arya Mazumdar
May 22, 2025stat.ML

Improved generalization bounds for binary linear classification via isoperimetry

We examine the concentration of uniform generalization errors around their expectation in binary linear classification problems via an isoperimetric argument. In particular, we establish Poincaré and log-Sobolev inequalities for the joint distribution of the output labels and the label-weighted input vectors, which we apply to derive concentration bounds. The derived results improve upon existing bounds obtained from general unbounded empirical processes, as well as that tailored specifically to logistic regression. In asymptotic analysis, we also show that almost sure convergence of uniform generalization errors to their expectation occurs in very broad settings, such as proportionally high-dimensional regimes. Using this convergence, we establish uniform laws of large numbers under dimension-free conditions.
Shogo Nakakita
Aug 27, 2026cs.IT

Sharp Minimax Regret for Infinite-Memory Logistic Prediction

We determine the minimax cumulative log-loss regret of a finite-alphabet, exogenously driven source with genuinely infinite input memory: independent Rademacher inputs (Ut)(U_t) are observed sequentially and the next binary mark has logit j1θjUt+1j\sum_{j\ge1}θ_jU_{t+1-j}, the unknown coefficients obeying a summable envelope θjrj|θ_j|\le r_j, jrjB\sum_jr_j\le B. At horizon TT, lag jj can move the logit by at most rjr_j and is exercised in only nT,j=(Tj+1)+n_{T,j}=(T-j+1)_+ rounds, and the two limitations combine into the sum ΓT(r)=jTlog(1+nT,jrj2)Γ_T(r)=\sum_{j\le T}\log(1+n_{T,j}r_j^{2}). One coordinate-localised Bayesian mixture achieves RT(r)CΓT(r)R_T(r)\le CΓ_T(r) for \emph{every} summable envelope with CC universal. Our main result is a matching nonasymptotic converse for the canonical exponential and polynomial envelopes; its new ingredients are a modular finite-sample information bound for logistic experiments with an exogenous random design, and a conditioning estimate for the overlapping Toeplitz lag matrix obtained by exhibiting each off-diagonal Gram sum as a sum of independent Rademacher variables indexed by the edges of a forest, needing neither local asymptotic normality nor any spectral theorem for random Toeplitz matrices. So ΓT(r)Γ_T(r) is the minimax regret scale here, giving Θ(α1log2T)Θ(α^{-1}\log^{2}T) for rj=Aeαjr_j=Ae^{-αj} and Θ(T1/(2s))Θ(T^{1/(2s)}) for rj=Ajsr_j=Aj^{-s}, s>1s>1 --- the latter without the extra (logT)11/(2s)(\log T)^{1-1/(2s)} factor any window-truncation analysis pays. We also show memory decay cannot determine regret, and that a profile-scaled online Newton predictor attains OB(ΓT(r))O_B(Γ_T(r)) in polynomial time per round.
Vaneet Aggarwal