Romanized Arabic Across Dialects: Views, Usage Patterns, and Linguistic Variation

Dialectal Arabic (DA) remains under-resourced compared to Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), particularly for machine reading comprehension (MRC) and question answering (QA). Existing Arabic QA benchmarks primarily focus on formal written MSA or multiple-choice QA, with limited coverage of naturally spoken dialects. Here, we aim to bridge this gap. We introduce EDRAC, the first large-scale benchmark for dialectal Arabic machine reading comprehension (MRC) and generative QA, covering five major dialects: Egyptian, Moroccan, Emirati, Syrian, and Saudi Arabic. EDRAC contains 499 passages derived from naturally occurring spoken interactions and 4,977 corresponding QA pairs generated through a human--LLM collaborative pipeline combining iterative generation, LLM-as-a-judge evaluation, and human verification. We benchmark Arabic-centric and multilingual LLMs on EDRAC using lexical and semantic metrics. Our results reveal substantial gaps between semantic answer quality and dialectal fidelity, highlighting the limitations of existing evaluation metrics for dialectal Arabic generation. EDRAC provides a realistic and challenging MRC benchmark for future research on dialectal Arabic NLP.

There is a significant gap in evaluating cultural reasoning in LLMs using conversational datasets that capture culturally rich and dialectal contexts. Most Arabic benchmarks focus on short text snippets in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), overlooking the cultural nuances that naturally arise in dialogues. To address this gap, we introduce ArabCulture-Dialogue, a culturally grounded conversational dataset covering 13 Arabic-speaking countries, in both MSA and each country's respective dialect, spanning 12 daily-life topics and 54 fine-grained subtopics. We utilize the dataset to form three benchmarking tasks: (i) multiple-choice cultural reasoning, (ii) machine translation between MSA and dialects, and (iii) dialect-steering generation. Our experiments indicate that the performance gap between MSA and Arabic dialects still exists, whereby the models perform worse on all three tasks in the dialectal setup, compared to the MSA one.

Arabic script uses 28 letters, many of which share a common base shape (rasm) and are distinguished only by dot placement. Because early Arabic manuscripts were written without dots yet remained interpretable, dot removal offers a natural test of whether these visual distinctions are functionally necessary. Prior work has shown that dotless Arabic can remain readable and effective for natural language processing (NLP), but it remains unclear whether this success depends on preserving the original rasm groupings or whether arbitrary but consistent remappings to the same reduced rasm set can achieve comparable performance. We address this question by comparing standard dotted and dotless Arabic with arbitrary character remappings constrained to the same 19 undotted rasms. We generated 2,000 random remappings under word- and character-level tokenization and selected four representative mappings with the highest and lowest entropy values. These representations were evaluated across language modeling, text classification, sequence labeling, machine translation, and restoration to the original script. The results show that neither preserving original character distinctions nor retaining traditional rasm-based groupings is necessary for strong NLP performance. Random remappings achieve competitive performance while reducing vocabulary size, out-of-vocabulary (OOV) rates, model size, and training cost. These findings suggest that, from an NLP perspective, Arabic character form-function relationships are largely arbitrary: models rely more on stable distributional structure than on the visual iconicity of letter forms.