CARE-X: Towards Clinically Useful Radiology VLMs with Auxiliary Supervision, Reward-Aligned Learning, and Tool-Augmented Measurement

Medical imaging is a cornerstone of diagnostics, yet automated chest X-ray report generation struggles with structural adherence, anatomical completeness, and semantic faithfulness. We introduce DobicVLM, a vision-language model combining supervised fine-tuning on MedGemma-4B with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) and clinically-grounded programmatic rewards. Our approach uses interpretable, rule-based reward components; structural verification, anatomical checklist, semantic similarity, and length constraints to enforce clinical standards without neural reward models. Trained on 1,000 de-identified image-report pairs from a private clinical dataset (with ethics approval and compliance to local regulations), DobicVLM is evaluated via blinded expert review on 69 held-out cases. DobicVLM outperforms Gemini 2.5 Flash across the majority of criteria, achieving the highest impression accuracy (27.2%) and medical terminology (86.5%) compared to both Gemini 2.5 Flash and MedGemma 4B baselines, with minor trade-offs in completeness and referrals. This demonstrates GRPO's value for transparent alignment in resource-limited settings. Keywords: Vision-Language Models, Radiology Report Generation, Reinforcement Learning, Medical AI, GRPO

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has rapidly advanced reasoning in vision--language models. However, for chest X-ray report generation, the standard rewards (i.e. exact-match accuracy and step-level processes) are incompatible because the reports consist of unordered and orthogonal findings, rather than a causal reasoning chain. We address this gap with a set-based view: each report is split into sentences and embedded by a frozen sentence transformer, yielding unordered embedding sets. We propose the use of set-to-set distances between generated and reference embeddings as continuous, permutation-invariant rewards. Across two datasets and three vision--language models (Qwen3-VL-2B/4B, Gemma3-4B), post-training with set-to-set distance based rewards via GRPO consistently outperforms supervised fine-tuning and exact-match GRPO on all headline metrics (BERTScore, RadGraph F1 and CheXbert F1 by average %6.80, %7.82 and %4.45 relative improvements respectively). The same set distances also enable test-time best-of-$N$ selection: scoring candidates by their distance to training-report embeddings outperforms random selection on our trained models as well as three closed-source LLMs (Mistral-Small, Gemini-2.5 Flash-Lite, GPT-4o-mini) with on average %16.4 relative improvement on BERTScore. Used as a streaming signal, they support a more efficient form of test-time scaling: pruning low-scoring candidates mid-generation reduces generated tokens by over 50% while preserving the Findings quality of full best-of-$N$ selection. Together these results establish set-distance rewards as a unified signal for both post-training and test-time scaling in chest X-ray report generation. Our code is publicly \href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Set-Distance-Rewards-CXR-BFDA}{available}.

Chest X-ray (CXR) radiology report generation (RRG) models have shown rapid progress on automated metrics, yet their clinical utility remains uncertain due to limited qualitative evaluation by radiologists. We present CXRMate-2, a state-of-the-art CXR RRG model that enables tractable reinforcement learning (RL) through structured multimodal temporal embeddings and high-resolution visual feature compression, for efficient, unified conditioning of an LLM decoder on visual, textual, and temporal context from a study and its prior. This enables group relative policy optimisation (GRPO), where a proposed reward function is used to improve semantic alignment with radiologist reports. Across the MIMIC-CXR, CheXpert Plus, and ReXgradient datasets, CXRMate-2 achieves statistically significant improvements over strong benchmarks, including gains of 11.2% and 24.4% in GREEN and RadGraph-XL, respectively, on MIMIC-CXR relative to MedGemma 1.5 (4B). To directly compare CXRMate-2 against radiologist reporting, we conduct a blinded, randomised qualitative retrospective evaluation. Three consultant radiologists compare generated and radiologist reports across 120 studies from the MIMIC-CXR test set. Generated reports were deemed acceptable (defined as preferred or rated equally to radiologist reports) in 45% of ratings, with no statistically significant difference in preference rates for seven of the eight analysed findings. Preferences for radiologist reports were driven primarily by higher recall, while generated reports were consistently preferred for readability. Together, these results define a clear pathway to clinically acceptable CXR RRG. Improving recall and the detection of subtle findings represents the primary remaining barrier to non-inferiority with radiologist reporting, positioning CXR RRG for prospective evaluation in assistive, radiologist-led workflows.