cs.LGAug 6, 2026

The Sparsity Whisperer

Authors: Linghao Kong, Inimai Subramanian, Micah Adler, Dan Alistarh, Dan Gutfreund, Nir Shavit

Organizations: MIT · IST Austria · IBM · MIT & Red Hat AI

Abstract

Pruning reduces the inference cost of large language models, but existing criteria primarily preserve large activations or reconstruct layer outputs. We argue that this overlooks a key computation performed by particularly sparsity-sensitive neurons in the MLP up and gate projections: separating similar inputs into dissimilar outputs. This suggests that effective pruning should preserve not only activations, but also the differences between outputs more broadly. We introduce a family of difference-informed pruning methods built upon this principle. Wisp is a first-order, update-free method that scores weights using input-difference norms, and Wisp+ refines this score neuronwise using the input pairs each neuron separates most strongly. Finally, Whisper is a second-order method that uses a lightly regularized difference Hessian as its reconstruction objective. Across Llama 2 and 3.1 models from 7B to 405B parameters, our second-order variant consistently improves over strong reconstruction-based baselines, while our update-free variants improve over activation-aware baselines, especially in constrained settings. The improvements over Wanda and SparseGPT extend to structured sparsity, downstream evaluations, and other model families. Augmenting stronger techniques such as RIA and ALPS with our difference-informed criteria yields further improvements, shifting the overall accuracy-runtime frontier outward at negligible additional cost. These results suggest that preserving output differences is a broadly useful and composable signal for post-training LLM sparsification.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Sep 11, 2026cs.LG

LILA: Calibration-Free Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Latent Spectral Geometry

Structured pruning of large language models (LLMs) offers hardware-efficient compression, yet existing methods require calibration data, gradient computation, or large auxiliary policy networks at pruning time. LILA (\emph{Latent-Informed Layer Analysis}) scores neuron importance via the Kolmogorov--Smirnov (KS) distance between empirical singular value distributions of the full and neuron-ablated feed-forward network (FFN) weight matrix, providing a closed-form spectral rule requiring no training, calibration data, or auxiliary network. Without any fine-tuning, LILA surpasses PruneNet (45M-parameter RL policy) by 1.57pp in zero-shot accuracy on LLaMA-2-7B at 25% sparsity, and outperforms WikiText-2-calibrated SliceGPT by up to 6.0pp across all sparsity levels, while preserving the original architecture. After one epoch of LoRA recovery fine-tuning, LILA achieves highly competitive performance, matching the heavily calibrated SliceGPT baseline to within a 0.48~pp margin across LLaMA-2-7B and Phi-2, despite using zero calibration data. A Neural Tangent Kernel analysis confirms a 22×\times reduction in functional distortion versus random pruning, providing theoretical grounding for the spectral importance criterion. Finally, extending LILA to dynamically allocate sparsity budgets via KS-scores yields state-of-the-art generative preservation at moderate compression, while uncovering fundamental single-layer architectural bottlenecks at higher compression regimes.
Sankar Behera, Dhruv Singh, Anshika Agnihotri +3
Large Language Model CompressionStructured PruningFeed-Forward
AskPDF
Jul 8, 2026cs.CL

PALS: Percentile-Aware Layerwise Sparsity for LLM Pruning

One-shot pruning methods like Wanda and SparseGPT apply the same sparsity ratio to every layer of a transformer, ignoring known variation in layer importance. We propose PALS (Percentile-Aware Layerwise Sparsity), which adjusts per-layer sparsity based on the 99th percentile of activation magnitudes, bounded to ±5%\pm 5\% around the target ratio. On LLaMA-2-7B at 50% sparsity, PALS achieves 10.96 WikiText-2 perplexity versus 12.92 for uniform Wanda (mean over 9 runs, p<0.001p < 0.001). The benefit is architecture-dependent: LLaMA-3-8B shows marginal gains and Mistral-7B shows none. We also find that gradient-based allocation -- the seemingly more principled approach -- produces results worse than random, suggesting that gradient magnitude does not predict the impact of discrete weight removal. PALS adds negligible cost to the pruning pipeline and requires no fine-tuning.
Yazdan Jamshidi, Alexey Shvets
Magnitude-Based PruningStructured PruningLarge Language Model CompressionSparsitySparsegpt
AskPDF
Aug 1, 2026cs.AI

F-WANDA: Fisher-Reweighted Post-Training Pruning for Sustainable Deployment of Large Language Models

One-shot post-training pruning is the most energy-frugal compression strategy for largelanguage models (LLMs), yet existing approaches trade either quality (WANDA) or compute cost (SPARSEGPT). We introduce F-WANDA, a drop-in modification of WANDA that reallocates the per-row keep budget across output neurons in proportion to the empirical Fisher information of the pre-activation. The Fisher signal is collected in a single additional backward pass over the same calibration corpus WANDA already uses; no weights are updated. On LLAMA-2-7B at 50 % unstructured sparsity, F-WANDA attains WikiText-2 perplexity of 6.85, matches WANDA fluency, and improves 5-shot MMLU by +1.6 pp over WANDA and +1.1 pp over SPARSEGPT, while incurring only one-third of SPARSEGPT pruning wall-clock and energy. The headline trade-off is achieved without extra calibration data or fine-tuning, placing F-WANDA on the Pareto frontier of quality versus pruning cost for sustainable LLM compression.
Himanshu Mishra
Large Language Model CompressionMagnitude-Based PruningFluencyCorpus
AskPDF