math.COAug 8, 2026

Exact Zarankiewicz Values On Two Finite Frontier Slices

Authors: Koyar Afrasyab

Organizations: Independent researcher.

Abstract

The Zarankiewicz number Z(m,n,s,t) is the maximum number of edges in a bipartite graph with parts of orders m and n containing no copy of Ks,t. We give one combined, certificate-based computer-assisted proof for two finite slices and a corrected neighboring frontier: Z(12,n,3,3) = 6n (18 <= n <= 22), Z(13,22,3,3) = 137, Z(13, 18, 3, 3) = 116, Z(14, 18, 3, 3) = 124, Z(15,18,3,3) = 132, Z(14, 17, 3, 3) = 118, Z(15, 17, 3, 3) = 126, 132 <= Z(16,17,3,3) <= 133. The load-bearing new upper bounds are the exact 12 x 18 and 13 x 18 certificate packages. Their orbit certificates exclude every hypothetical matrix at the next edge count. Deletion lemmas and explicit witnesses close four neighboring cells, while the 16 x 17 entry is deliberately reported as an interval because only its 132-edge lower witness and the published 133 upper bound are certified here. Separately, the 13 x 22 proof excludes 138 ones by reducing to 83 degree profiles, rationally separating 77 of them, and eliminating the remaining six by marked-row congruences, leave enumeration, modular Gram tests, and exact Farkas certificates. All accepted claims are replayed by standard-library Python and exact integer/rational arithmetic; floating-point optimization is used only to discover certificates.

Explore similar work

May 1, 2026cs.AI

New Bounds for Zarankiewicz Numbers via Reinforced LLM Evolutionary Search

The Zarankiewicz number Z(m,n,s,t)\textbf{Z}(m, n, s, t) is the maximum number of edges in a bipartite graph Gm,nG_{m, n} such that there is no complete Ks,tK_{s, t} bipartite subgraph. We determine for the first time the exact values of three Zarankiewicz numbers: Z(11,21,3,3)=116\textbf{Z}(11, 21, 3, 3)=116, Z(11,22,3,3)=121\textbf{Z}(11, 22, 3, 3)=121, and Z(12,22,3,3)=132\textbf{Z}(12, 22, 3, 3)=132. We further establish lower bounds for 41 more Zarankiewicz numbers, including several that are within one edge of the best known upper bound, and we match the established value in four more closed cases. Our results are obtained using OpenEvolve, an open-source evolutionary algorithm based on Large Language Models (LLMs) that iteratively improves algorithms for generating mathematical constructions by optimizing a reward signal which we tailored for this specific problem. These findings provide new extremal graph constructions and demonstrate the potential of LLM-guided evolutionary search to contribute to mathematical research. In addition to presenting the resulting constructions, we report the generation algorithms produced, describe the relevant implementation details, and provide our computational costs. Our costs are remarkably low, at less than $30 for each Zarankiewicz parameter combination, showing that LLM-guided evolutionary search can be an inexpensive, reproducible, and accessible tool for discovering new combinatorial constructions.
Jay Bhan, Nicole Nobili, Patrick Langer
Jul 25, 2026math.CO

Exact values and exact upper bounds for families of integers with arithmetic progression intersections (Erdős Problem #272)

Let t(N)t(N) be the largest tt for which there exist distinct sets A1,,At{1,,N}A_1,\dots,A_t \subseteq \{1,\dots,N\} such that AiAjA_i \cap A_j is a nonempty arithmetic progression for all iji \neq j (Erdos Problem #272). Simonovits and Sos proved t(N)=O(N2)t(N)=O(N^2) and conjectured (N2)+1\binom{N}{2}+1 is best possible; Szabo disproved this by a construction giving t(N)(N2)+1+(N1)/4t(N) \geq \binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor, proved the asymptotics t(N)=N2/2+O(N5/3(logN)3)t(N)=N^2/2+O(N^{5/3}(\log N)^3), and asked whether t(N)=(N2)+O(N)t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+O(N) and whether some element lies in all sets of any extremal family (the kernel question). We determine t(N)t(N) exactly for all 3N123 \leq N \leq 12 by exhaustive computation: in this entire range Szabo's lower bound is exact, and we conjecture that t(N)=(N2)+1+(N1)/4t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor for every NN. Towards the matching upper bound we prove, for every NN, that Szabo's bound is the exact maximum over all families with a common element (starred families). The proof combines a self-contained ``defect-one'' counting inequality for staircase regions with a new structural theorem: every non-progression member of such a family contains a bad pair that no other member can share. Consequently the sharpened conjecture reduces to a single remaining statement, namely Szabo's kernel conjecture that some element lies in all sets of an extremal family, and we prove first structural constraints on putative non-starred extremal families.
Zhanfu Yang
Jul 26, 2026cs.LO

Formalizing Flag Algebras in Lean

Razborov's flag algebra method is a powerful tool for proving asymptotic inequalities in extremal graph theory, often reducing the task to finding a finite certificate by semidefinite programming. We present a machine-checked formalization of the method for finite simple graphs, together with a certificate-to-proof compiler that turns externally generated certificate data into algebraic proofs checked by Lean. The formalization covers the foundations of the method: partially labeled graphs, their densities in large graphs, the quotient algebra of density expressions, graph-limit semantics through positive homomorphisms, and the downward operators used to average out labels. The compiler treats the external semidefinite programming output as candidate data rather than trusted input: Lean independently computes the required density and multiplication facts, verifies positive semidefiniteness exactly over Q\mathbb{Q}, and carries out the algebraic normalization steps of flag-algebra proofs. Our case studies yield formal proofs of seven Turán-type upper bounds, including Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, a C4C_4-density bound for triangle-free graphs, and edge-density bounds for K4K_4-free, K5K_5-free, and C5C_5-free graphs. Independently of the compiler, we formalize the matching constructions that complete the exact Turán densities of Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, and prove two inequalities of Goodman. Our constrained semantics also prompted a meta-theoretic comparison of two ways of imposing graph constraints: building a hereditary constraint into the flag algebra from the start, or testing inequalities afterward on constrained graph limits with labels chosen at random. We state the resulting root-plantability criterion characterizing when the two approaches agree; a forthcoming paper will present the complete account.
Gyeongwon Jeong, Seonghun Park, Jihoon Hyun +2