physics.flu-dynAug 8, 2026

Eikonal Regularisation in Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Three-Dimensional Level-Set Advection: Transferability of Two-Dimensional Design Principles

Authors: Muhammad Akbar Khan

Organizations: Department of Mathematics, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 75270, Pakistan

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks applied to the level-set formulation of interface advection commonly augment the residual and initial-condition losses with an eikonal regulariser, penalising the deviation of φ\|\nablaφ\| from unity. A previous two-dimensional study identified this weight as the dominant hyperparameter and found its optimum shifts by four orders of magnitude between rigid-body and deforming flows, but left open whether these principles transfer to three dimensions and whether single-seed results survive run-to-run variability. We answer both by repeating the weight selection across four 3D benchmarks (translating sphere, rotating sphere, slotted sphere, reversed vortex), sweeping six weights with three seeds at full training budget under a pre-registered selection rule. The ordering transfers: the selected weight tracks how far the exact solution departs from the signed-distance property, spanning four decades from 10110^{-1} where it holds exactly to 10510^{-5} where the interface is stretched. Values transfer only benchmark by benchmark; two of four carry over unchanged and two do not, so inheritance must be verified. The multi-seed protocol reveals that at small weights the seed-to-seed standard deviation equals the error itself, and the regulariser reduces it by more than an order of magnitude, buying reproducibility as well as accuracy. We benchmark against a fifth-order WENO solver on identical grids and error measures; the classical scheme is more accurate on all four problems, by two orders of magnitude on smooth rigid advection, with a margin that narrows with geometric difficulty and is smaller in volume conservation than in the field norm. Finally, we show that the relative L2L_2 error cannot certify the preservation of thin features, and report a feature-restricted measure that can.

Explore similar work

Jul 2, 2026cs.LG

An Optimisation Framework for the Well-Conditioned Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising route to solve partial differential equations, yet they have struggled to reach the precision of classical solvers. The obstacle is increasingly understood to be one of optimisation, owing to the severely ill-conditioned loss landscape. We present DSGNAR\textbf{DSGNAR}: Doubly-Sketched Gauss-Newton with Adaptive Ratio, a scalable second-order optimisation framework that confronts this ill-conditioning and, in doing so, obtains unprecedented accuracy and speed. DSGNAR\textbf{DSGNAR} couples a doubly-sketched Gauss-Newton model with a novel strategy that carefully controls both regularisation and step length. Across a suite of problems spanning nonlinear, chaotic, multi-scale, high-dimensional, and Navier-Stokes, the framework greatly improves on the state of the art: able to attain relative 2\ell_2 errors as low as 3×10163\times10^{-16} in double precision, improve contemporary results by five orders of magnitude on the canonical Burgers' equation, and as much as eight orders on a high-dimensional Poisson problem, while remaining markedly faster. We further show that, in single precision, solutions at the limit of round-off error can be obtained very quickly: Burgers' equation to 2rel=4.75×107\ell_2^{\text{rel}} = 4.75 \times 10^{-7} in under ten seconds. The framework is also robust to the choice of architecture, arithmetic precision, and initial hyperparameters. The code is available at https://www.github.com/wephy/physics-informed-neural-networks
Joseph Webb, Sadok Jerad, Coralia Cartis
May 22, 2026cs.LG

Coupling-Robust Accuracy in Multiphysics Physics Informed Neural Networks via Kronecker-Preconditioned Optimization

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for coupled multiphysics systems suffer systematic accuracy degradation as inter-equation coupling strengthens. We provide a theoretical explanation through neural tangent kernel (NTK) analysis: for linearly coupled systems, the standard NTK's spectral radius grows as Ω(γ2)Ω(γ^2) with coupling strength γγ, shrinking the stable learning rate, while block-diagonal Gauss--Newton (GN) preconditioning yields a preconditioned NTK KP=JH+JK_P = JH^{+}J^\top whose spectral radius is bounded by SS (number of networks), independent of γγ. Adam's diagonal preconditioning destroys this projector structure -- inflating λmaxλ_{\max} far above SS for any coupling type -- and its residual-dynamics kernel grows as Θ(γ)Θ(γ), placing its stable learning rate strictly between gradient descent and GN. For one-way coupling the limitation is class-wide: no diagonal preconditioner, fixed or adaptive, halves the driving residual in fewer than Ω(γ)Ω(γ) iterations (Ω(γ2)Ω(γ^2) if fixed), whereas block-diagonal GN requires O(1)O(1). We verify Ω(γ2)Ω(γ^2) growth across linearly coupled benchmarks and confirm λmax(KP)=Sλ_{\max}(K_P) = S in all three 1D systems, including nonlinearly coupled NP+P. Combining the Kronecker-preconditioned optimizer SOAP with inverse-gradient-norm loss balancing (SOAP+GradNorm) yields coupling-robust accuracy: across 222 experiments spanning three 1D systems and a 2D electroosmotic flow benchmark, SOAP+GradNorm maintains final-epoch L2L_2 accuracy across coupling strengths, with 2.3×\leq 2.3\times degradation in nonlinear NP+P while Adam+GradNorm fails (L2>0.1L_2 > 0.1). SOAP+GradNorm further scales to a 2D, 6-PDE electroosmotic flow at EDL-resolved conditions down to ε=0.01\varepsilon = 0.01 -- a regime all prior PINN electrokinetics studies have avoided -- where Adam+GradNorm fails entirely (L2>0.3L_2 > 0.3).
Youngjae Park, Jaemin Kim, Junghwa Hong
Sep 21, 2026cs.LG

Learning Physics from an Imperfect Ancestor

Neural operators evaluate parametric partial differential equations cheaply but degrade sharply outside their training distribution. Physics-informed neural networks avoid dependence on labeled data, yet their optimization can be basin-fragile: when the governing residual admits multiple solutions, a PINN trained from scratch may converge to a physically incorrect state despite achieving a small residual. We show that these failure modes can be addressed jointly: an imperfect NO provides the structural prior needed to place a PINN in the correct solution basin, while the PDE residual refines the solution beyond the operator's accuracy. We introduce a three-stage framework that freezes the spatial basis of a physics-informed NO, extrapolates its solution branch to an out-of-distribution parameter using a polynomial continuation prior, and distills the resulting field into a fresh PINN. The NO need not be accurate at the target; it transfers solution-branch information, while PDE residual minimization in the PINN governs convergence. We evaluate the framework on three nonlinear PDEs: 1D viscous Burgers, 2D steady Allen-Cahn near a pitchfork bifurcation, and 2D steady lid-driven cavity flow. For Allen-Cahn, where the trivial solution satisfies the PDE residual exactly, a standard PINN collapses to the trivial zero branch, whereas distillation from the crude extrapolated operator recovers the non-trivial branch that matches the finite-difference reference. For the lid-driven cavity, extrapolating to a Reynolds number of Re = 3200 accelerates convergence to the correct physical state, achieving competitive accuracy using fewer parameters and optimization steps than recent literature baselines. These results establish a simple principle: an NO need not accurately predict the solution to be useful; it only needs to identify the correct basin from which PINN optimization can recover it.
S. Mohammad Mousavi, Teeratorn Kadeethum, Nikolaos Bouklas +1