Visual Distortion Detection in UGC Images Using Large Multimodal Models

Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in image quality assessment (IQA) by bridging visual perception with descriptive evaluations. However, existing approaches mainly focus on holistic quality prediction, often functioning as black boxes that provide limited insight into where distortions occur and how they affect perceived quality, hindering fine-grained analysis of localized and heterogeneous degradations. We propose GS-IQA, a framework that reformulates IQA as a progressive Where--What--How diagnosis, emulating the human perceptual process from an initial glance to closer scrutiny. Since a severity judgment is meaningful only for a correctly localized and recognized region, we realize this progression through a two-stage reinforcement learning paradigm that respects such dependencies: the glance stage uses a perception-gated reward to establish where degradations lie and what they are, activating severity feedback only once both are correct, while the scrutiny stage introduces online reward-conditioned degradation generation to synthesize hard examples targeted at the model's perceptual bottlenecks, sharpening its discrimination of subtle severity variations. To enable systematic evaluation, we construct Diag-Bench, a region-level IQA benchmark of about 25K curated samples spanning 12 distortion types and five ordinal severity levels. Extensive experiments show that GS-IQA consistently surpasses state-of-the-art methods in distortion localization, recognition, and severity estimation, and that its diagnostic representations transfer effectively to conventional global quality prediction across diverse external benchmarks. Code and data will be released.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in settings where sensitivity to low-level image degradations matters, including content moderation, image restoration, and quality monitoring. Yet their ability to recognize distortion type and severity remains poorly understood. We present DistortBench, a diagnostic benchmark for no-reference distortion perception in VLMs. DistortBench contains 13,500 four-choice questions covering 27 distortion types, six perceptual categories, and five severity levels: 25 distortions inherit KADID-10k calibrations, while two added rotation distortions use monotonic angle-based levels. We evaluate 18 VLMs, including 17 open-weight models from five families and one proprietary model. Despite strong performance on high-level vision-language tasks, the best model reaches only 61.9% accuracy, just below the human majority-vote baseline of 65.7% (average individual: 60.2%), indicating that low-level perceptual understanding remains a major weakness of current VLMs. Our analysis further reveals weak and non-monotonic scaling with model size, performance drops in most base--thinking pairs, and distinct severity-response patterns across model families. We hope DistortBench will serve as a useful benchmark for measuring and improving low-level visual perception in VLMs.

Traditional image quality assessment (IQA) methods rely on mean opinion scores (MOS), which are resource-intensive to collect and fail to provide interpretable, localized feedback on specific image distortions. We overcome these limitations by shifting from absolute quality prediction to a relational and directional assessment. Our approach utilizes a self-supervised synthetic distortion engine to generate training data, eliminating the need for manual annotation. A distortion prediction network is trained with an anti-symmetric objective to produce spatially-aware, disentangled maps that identify the type, intensity, and direction of distortions relative to a reference image. Subsequently, a scoring network is trained via contrastive learning on ordinally ranked image sets to predict a relational quality score. Our method provides a more granular and interpretable approach to IQA for the targeted optimization of image processing algorithms without requiring any human-labeled quality scores.