A 12-CNOT Double Qubit Excitation Gate

Using partial knowledge of a quantum state to control multiqubit entanglement is a largely unexplored paradigm in the emerging field of quantum interactive dynamics with the potential to address outstanding challenges in quantum state preparation and compression, quantum control, and quantum complexity. We present a deep reinforcement learning (RL) approach using an actor-critic algorithm for constructing short disentangling circuits for states with up to 16 qubits. With access to only two-qubit reduced density matrices, our agent decides which pairs of qubits to apply two-qubit gates on; requiring only local information makes it directly applicable on modern NISQ devices, as we demonstrated experimentally on a trapped-ion quantum computer. Utilizing a permutation-equivariant transformer architecture, the agent can autonomously identify qubit permutations within the state, and adjusts the disentangling protocol accordingly. Once trained, it provides circuits from different initial states without further optimization. We demonstrate the agent's ability to identify and exploit the entanglement structure of multi-qubit states. We analyze the disentangling circuits constructed by the agent for 4- and 5-qubit Haar-random states, and observe strong correlations between consecutive gates and among the qubits involved. Through extensive benchmarking, we show the efficacy of the RL approach to find disentangling protocols with minimal gate resources. We explore the resilience of our trained agents to noise, highlighting their potential for real-world quantum computing applications. Analyzing optimal disentangling protocols, we report a general circuit to prepare an arbitrary 4-qubit state using at most 5 two-qubit (10 CNOT) gates.

In this work, a quantum architecture search framework for approximate quantum state preparation (QSP) is proposed. QSP is a challenging task, since the search space grows exponentially with the number of qubits, making the identification of the optimal circuit non-trivial. To address this problem, deep reinforcement learning is employed through an agent based on proximal policy optimization. The objective of the agent is to identify the best possible approximation of the target state while simultaneously minimizing the number of gates used. At each step, the agent appends a new gate to the circuit and recomputes the fidelity between the approximated state and the target states. Various experiments have been performed from 2 to 5 qubits. Both predefined states, such as Bell, GHZ, W, and Dicke states, and completely random states are considered. The proposed framework is able to achieve approximation errors of $10^{-14}$.

Trotter Suzuki product formulas are the standard route to Hamiltonian evolution on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (\NISQ{}) hardware, but their accuracy depends on three coupled choices: term grouping, product-formula order, and time-step allocation. Grouping and order are discrete, which makes direct gradient optimization infeasible and forces existing compilers to rely on static heuristics. We describe P-GONE, a method that combines a conditional diffusion model (D3PM + DDPM), a graph neural network (\GNN{}) encoder, and closed-loop REINFORCE fine-tuning to jointly learn grouping, order, and time-step optimization over a mixed discrete-continuous space. Under fidelity-matched conditions ($F \geq 0.95$), the method achieves circuit depth 86 versus 1673 for Qiskit fourth-order (ungrouped, Suzuki-4), about $19.4\times$ compression, and 141 for Paulihedral (first-order Trotter), about $1.6\times$ compression. At $T=0.90$ the method also beats the Qiskit group-commuting teacher (65 vs 103, $1.6\times$ compression), though at $T=0.95$ the teacher still leads -- a stratified pattern that points toward fidelity-aware fine-tuning. Under a standard depolarizing noise model, the method achieves noisy fidelity roughly $2\times$ the Qiskit fourth-order baseline (0.743 vs 0.380). Ablation shows a clear hierarchy: order learning $>$ time allocation $>$ grouping. Best-of-N sampling ($N=32$ is a practical sweet spot) and CFG guidance give flexible fidelity-depth trade-offs at inference. The method works well on structured Hamiltonians (TFIM, Heisenberg), but random Pauli Hamiltonians fail entirely at $T \geq 0.95$ -- a boundary that defines where the method applies.