Non-destructive X-ray imaging can reveal internal hazelnut defects that are difficult to detect by external inspection alone; however, automated interpretation remains challenging because of subtle radiographic differences among classes, marked class imbalance, and limited annotated data. Here, we present a benchmark for binary hazelnut quality classification (healthy versus defective) based on 799 segmented single-kernel X-ray images (224 x 224 pixels, grayscale), grouped into 101 acquisition units. Seven single-model configurations and ten probability-aggregation ensembles were evaluated using a group-wise split-rotation protocol across five data splits generated using different random seeds. Decision thresholds were selected on the validation set, and performance was assessed deterministically on validation and test sets. Under the expert-reassessed annotation condition, the average-probability ensemble of the binary cross-entropy-trained convolutional neural network and frozen Swin Transformer achieved the highest mean balanced accuracy (86.3% +/- 1.8%, five seeds), with several other ensembles providing comparable performance. Across methods, substantial split-to-split variability was observed, indicating that multi-split evaluation is essential for reliable model comparison at this dataset scale. Expert reassessment of ambiguous samples improved the performance of all 17 evaluated methods by 2.8-8.1 percentage points, while having only a limited effect on cross-split variance. The results highlight both the potential of deep learning for automated X-ray-based hazelnut quality assessment and the importance of rigorous evaluation and label curation in small, imbalanced agricultural imaging datasets.
Deep learning is widely applied in medical image analysis, but up to 10% of manually labelled images may be incorrect, degrading model performance. This paper proposes an automated method to identify incorrectly labelled medical images by analyzing sequences of loss functions from deep learning classification networks over multiple training epochs. Identified images can be reviewed and relabelled by experts, improving dataset quality and model performance. Two experiments validate the method on a fundus image dataset for referable diabetic retinopathy screening. In the first, 6% (648) of 10,788 gold-standard labels were intentionally flipped. The method identified 75.31% (488) of the flipped samples, with only 4.85% (492) false positives among correctly labelled samples. In the second, reviewing and correcting the 980 identified samples (9.1% of the dataset) and retraining the model improved best accuracy on an independent test set from 95.93% (with 6% label noise) to 96.50% (with 1.5% noise), approaching the ideal 96.57% (with 0% noise). The results demonstrate the method's effectiveness in improving model performance through automated label quality control.
Automated classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from peripheral blood smear images has often reported near-perfect performance on the C-NMC 2019 dataset. We show that such results can be inflated by patient-level data leakage caused by random image-level partitioning, where cells from the same subject may appear in both training and test folds. We establish a leakage-aware benchmark under a strict subject-disjoint protocol, comparing LightGBM, RBF-SVM, EfficientNet-B0, EfficientNet-B1, and ViT-Tiny. Models are developed using three subject-disjoint folds from 73 subjects and evaluated on an external preliminary-phase test set of 1,867 images from 28 unseen subjects with zero patient overlap. Beyond discrimination, we assess calibration using expected calibration error, Brier score, and temperature scaling. Under honest evaluation, EfficientNet-B1 achieves the best performance, with AUROC 0.913, sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.80, and calibrated ECE 0.024. Frozen-feature classifiers and ViT-Tiny show high sensitivity but poor specificity, indicating a tendency to over-predict the malignant class. A random-versus-subject-disjoint ablation shows that random splitting inflates AUROC by about 0.04 even in the conservative frozen-feature setting. These findings caution against image-level evaluation on C-NMC 2019 and provide a reproducible, calibration-aware benchmark for future work.
Automated plant disease diagnosis is increasingly deployed on farmer-held devices in regions where agronomic expertise is scarce and network connectivity is unreliable. Three obstacles limit its practical value: public benchmarks are dominated by a small set of non-native crops, region-specific datasets are rarely validated by domain experts, and the architectures that reach competitive accuracy carry parameter budgets that are unsuited to low-cost hardware. We propose AgroVisNet, a compact convolutional network trained from scratch, together with BD-PlantDX, an expert-validated benchmark of 12,432 field images spanning 12 classes of radish, potato and pointed gourd in healthy and diseased states, collected across the Bogura and Nilphamari districts of Bangladesh. AgroVisNet couples grouped bottleneck residual blocks carrying sequential channel and spatial attention with multi-scale depthwise blocks and a dual-pooling classification head, reaching 290,572 trainable parameters. On BD-PlantDX the model attains 99.52% test accuracy and 99.52% weighted F1, exceeding all six ImageNet-pretrained lightweight backbones evaluated under an identical protocol while using 8.7 to 16.8 times fewer parameters and 1.3 to 8.5 times fewer multiply-accumulate operations. Exported for deployment, the model quantises to a 0.46 MB full-integer network at a 0.22 percentage-point accuracy cost and classifies an image in 8.40 ms on a single CPU. Across five random seeds accuracy remains at 99.57 +- 0.10%, a ten-variant ablation isolates the contribution of each component, and the same architecture transfers without redesign to two independently collected datasets at 98.71% and 99.05% accuracy. Grad-CAM evidence indicates that predictions rest on lesion-bearing leaf regions rather than on background cues.
Md. Abdullah Mandal, Saad Ahmed, Md. Khalid Syfullah