Exploring ESC Winners with Nested Diagrams

We present ScorePrompts, an interactive system in which users upload a score, receive natural-language descriptions of its musical structure, ask questions about specific passages, and inspect the corresponding analysis results in staff notation. Specialist MIR components first estimate harmony, tonality, cadences, formal boundaries, texture, and note-level roles, organizing their outputs at note, beat, measure, and piece levels. A schema-constrained language model converts these results into descriptions rather than inferring musical structure directly from raw MusicXML. For questions such as "What changes in measures 14-18?", a deterministic router selects the relevant measures and analytical levels and returns a concise response together with the underlying results and caveats. Verovio renders the score and links the returned information to cited measures and note-level attributes. The interface also exposes intermediate tables and disagreements between analytical levels. ScorePrompts is intended for exploratory score analysis and explanation, not score editing. The demo shows how existing analysis models, constrained language generation, Q&A retrieval, and notation-based visualization can provide natural-language access to symbolic music analysis while keeping intermediate results inspectable.

We present vega-mir, an open-source Python library that bundles nine information-theoretic and statistical metrics for the analysis of symbolic music corpora behind a small, tested, citable API, and demonstrates two of them at corpus scale in case studies not addressed by the upstream Cygnus paper. Of the nine metrics, three (Shannon entropy, Kullback-Leibler divergence, Zipfian fits) were deployed in the companion Cygnus arXiv preprint; two (network analysis on chord-transition graphs and spectral analysis of rubato curves) are deployed in full case studies here; the four remaining (multi-dimensional Gini, chi-squared stationarity, Higuchi fractal dimension, interval distribution) are validated against analytic anchors and exercised as sanity checks on a bundled 8-composer dataset. The two case studies yield two main observations. First, on the fourteen MAESTRO composers with N >= 10 pieces, the PageRank value of the gravity-centre node correlates with the marginal Kullback-Leibler distance at rho = 0.61 (Spearman, composer-level jackknife N = 14); the categorical gravity-centre identity takes five distinct values across the corpus but is not itself correlated with marginal KL (rho = 0.13, p = 0.21). Second, on the 247-piece Bach multi-master corpus (Schiff, Gould, Richter), Gould holds the highest periodicity ratio of the three performers, not the lowest, inverting the cliché that low scalar rubato reads as "metronomic": Gould's rubato is small in amplitude but structured in time, with a median dominant period of 66 beats against Schiff's 102 and Richter's 104.

Professionals across medicine, engineering, finance, manufacturing, and the sciences often make consequential decisions from charts. Existing chart benchmarks do not sufficiently measure this ability: they are dominated by bar, line, and pie formats, rely on shorter reasoning chains, and are nearing saturation, with frontier models already scoring 80-90%. We introduce Chartography, a benchmark of 100 tasks that pair charts drawn from professional practice, in domain-specific formats that standard chart benchmarks rarely include, with questions written by professionals who read these charts for a living and independently verified by three additional experts. In an evaluation of 30 frontier-model configurations (20 scored trials per task), the best configuration reaches only 45.0% mean pass@1; the remainder span 9.0-39.5%. Failures concentrate in visual perception: models can miss nuanced features, misread values along sparsely labeled axes, mishandle projected 3D geometry, and violate domain conventions encoded in the chart. We release all tasks, images, provenance metadata, and evaluation code.