Organizations: Department of Physics, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan · Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan · Quantum and Spacetime Research Institute (QuaSR), Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
We perform a global search for values of the Yukawa matrices and Majorana masses in the Type-I seesaw mechanism. Using flow matching, which is a generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) method, we generate a broad set of solutions reproducing the experimentally measured values of the neutrino mass-squared differences and the mixing angles. Then, a machine learning method known as an autoencoder is applied to uncover non-trivial correlations among physical quantities in the lepton sector. Our analysis reveals new non-linear relations involving neutrino masses and CP phases. These findings may contribute to elucidating the origins of the mass hierarchies and mixing patterns among generation structure.
Figures & tables
Observables
Normal Ordering (NO)
Inverted Ordering (IO)
best fit ±1σ
3σ range
best fit ±1σ
3σ range
sin2θ12
0.308−0.011+0.012
0.275→0.345
0.308−0.011+0.012
0.275→0.345
θ12/\tcdegree
33.68−0.70+0.73
31.63→35.95
33.68−0.70+0.73
31.63→35.95
sin2θ13
0.02215−0.00058+0.00056
0.02030→0.02388
0.02231−0.00056+0.00056
0.02060→0.02409
θ13/\tcdegree
8.56−0.11+0.11
8.19→8.89
8.59−0.11+0.11
8.25→8.93
sin2θ23
0.470−0.013+0.017
0.435→0.585
0.550−0.015+0.012
0.440→0.584
Table 1: The experimental results adopted in this work are taken from the NuFIT 6.0 global fit incorporating the Super-Kamiokande atmospheric-neutrino data [ 20 ] . For neutrino masses, Δm3l2≡Δm312=m32−m12>0 for NO and Δm3l2≡Δm322=m32−m22<0 for IO.
Figure 1: Transformer architecture for vector field estimation.
Figure 2: Results generated using flow matching. The solid red line represents the best-fit value, and the dashed line represents the 3 σ range.
Stage
Layer
Operation
Output dimension
Input
–
Input vector
9
Encoder input
Linear(9,64)+tanh
64
Down projection
Linear(64,32)+tanh
32
Encoder
Normalization
LayerNorm(32)
32
Residual blocks
ResBlock(32)×4
32
Latent projection
Linear(32,2)
2
Table 2: Autoencoder architecture used to compress the observables into a two-dimensional latent space and reconstruct the original input vector.
Figure 3: The left panel shows the visualization of the latent space, and the right panel shows the clustering result using HDBSCAN. Clusters 0, 1, 2, and 3 contain 105, 141, 177, and 217 points, respectively.
Figure 4: Distribution of observables in each cluster.
Cluster
m1[meV]
m2[meV]
m3[meV]
δCP(≃α31/2)[rad]
α21[rad]
0
0.0144 – 6.90
7.99 – 10.8
48.5 – 52.1
−0.473 – +1.92
−0.692 – +0.733
1
0.0133 – 7.36
8.01 – 11.4
48.7 – 51.7
+1.43 – +3.14
−0.706 – +0.727
2
0.00147 – 3.86
7.99 – 9.70
48.4 – 51.5
−1.14 – +1.17
−0.752 – +0.705
3
0.00559 – 5.36
7.92 – 10.3
48.7 – 51.5
−3.13 – −0.642
−0.703 – +0.719
Table 3: Range of observables in each cluster.
Cluster 0
Cluster 1
Cluster 2
Cluster 3
m1
0.955
0.978
0.793
0.958
m2
0.612
0.697
0.144
0.493
m3
0.335
0.697
0.476
0.707
s12
0.070
0.017
0.014
0.035
s13
0.041
0.024
0.043
0.043
s23
0.038
0.030
0.066
0.042
Table 4: Coefficients of determination R2 for quadratic regressions of the physical observables in terms of the latent variables (z1,z2) , evaluated separately for each cluster. The bold entries indicate three representative results in each cluster.
Figure 5: Parallelogram approximations of the four cluster domains in the two-dimensional latent space for samples satisfying χ2<45 . The dashed lines indicate the linear fits used to determine the orientation of each domain.
Figure 6: The orange surfaces are obtained by mapping the parallelogram domains shown in Fig. 5 through the quadratic regressions of Eqs. ( 4.7 )–( 4.10 ), and are truncated to the data ranges shown in Fig. 4 . The black points denote the generated samples. The red plane corresponds to the adopted prior to obtain Eq. ( 2.11 ), which is the constraint for the NO case from CMB+BAO.
We construct the Yukawa couplings of the quark sector as overlap integrals of Gaussian wave functions in extra spatial dimensions. Assuming that the wave function of each chiral fermion is localised at a point in the extra dimensions, while that of the Higgs doublet is flat, the Yukawa matrix elements are determined by the relative positions of the three left-handed quark doublets, q1, q2, q3, and the six right-handed quark singlets, u1, u2, u3, d1, d2, d3. We employ numerical optimisation techniques from machine learning to identify field configurations that satisfy all current experimental constraints on the quark Yukawa sector. In this framework, the large hierarchy of quark masses arises naturally, since the overlap integrals of Gaussian wave functions are exponentially sensitive to O(1) separations in the extra dimensions.
Shinsuke Kawai, Nobuchika Okada
Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, 1-4-12 Kojirakawa-machi, Yamagata, 990-8560 Japan · Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, AL35487 USA
In this work we demonstrate that a single transformer-based generative model can capture Standard Model structure spanning five decades of invariant mass, from the sub-GeV regime to the TeV continuum, a range that no single Monte Carlo sample covers. To achieve this we design ShellFlow, a Riemannian conditional flow matching model that, given the recorded event composition, generates each particle on its on-shell manifold. Its only physics priors are the on-shell condition and the invariant-mass formula. The model is trained on ∼109 real pp collision events from the ATLAS Open Data 13~TeV release and told nothing else. From a single training run, the model learns to reproduce all of the following: intra-particle kinematics, the dilepton resonances (J/ψ, Υ, Z) at their PDG positions, the leptonic Weinberg angle, the W and top-quark masses, and inter-particle correlations that enter no training objective. A substantial fraction of the Standard Model is thus learnable directly from recorded collision data.
Midori Kato, Kevin A. Urquía-Calderón, Inar Timiryasov +1
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 155A, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
Determining the neutrino mass ordering remains a central open problem in particle physics. While next-generation long-baseline experiments are expected to resolve this question, current data provide limited sensitivity because the spectral differences between normal and inverted ordering are subtle and entangled with parameter degeneracies. We investigate a machine-learning strategy for mass-ordering determination using a feed-forward neural-network classifier trained on synthetic long-baseline datasets generated with three-flavour oscillation probabilities, matter effects, and statistical fluctuations. We evaluate the classifier against standard χ2 and logL approaches using common discrimination metrics, including receiver-operating-characteristic curves, to quantify sensitivity and to illustrate how operating points can be selected to prioritise purity or efficiency. We find that the neural network achieves performance comparable to conventional fits for the scenarios studied, providing a flexible, independent cross-check of established analyses. The framework can be extended to incorporate systematic uncertainties and to explore joint inference of oscillation parameters, and it may also serve as a pedagogical tool for introducing machine-learning methods in neutrino physics.
T. J. C. Bezerra, L. Asquith, E. Bannister +1
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, United Kingdom · †Now at Universal Quantum Ltd., Haywards Heath, RH16 1XQ, United Kingdom