Second-Moment Memory in Coordinatewise Adam

Adam is widely observed to remain stable even when the objective deviates significantly from global smoothness. Under the generalized smoothness framework, however, existing analyses rely on strong tail assumptions on the stochastic gradients, such as almost-sure boundedness or sub-Gaussianity. Whether Adam converges on generalized smooth objectives under only second moment information on the stochastic gradients, without such concentration assumptions, was identified as an important open direction by Li et al. (2023). This paper gives an affirmative answer under fairly general conditions: such tail assumptions are not necessary. Building on the Adam self-normalization framework of Jin et al. (2026), developed for classical smoothness and bounded variance, we extend the stopping-time and de-preconditioning strategy to the $L_0$-$L_p$ generalized smoothness condition and a generalized second moment ABC condition. Even when the stochastic-gradient condition provides only second moment information that may grow along the trajectory, the stochastic trajectory of Adam remains in a locally well-behaved smoothness region, with stretched-exponential tail decay under bounded variance and global smoothness. Consequently, we establish high-probability convergence rate guarantees over the full range $p<2$, with confidence dependence of order $δ^{-1/2}$, while the stepsize prefactor depends on $δ$ only through a single logarithmic factor. We further construct a hard instance showing that, under only second-moment information, this $δ^{-1/2}$-type confidence dependence is sharp. Finally, in the regime $p<1$, we combine the trajectory control with polynomial-growth estimates on rare events to obtain convergence rate guarantees in expectation.

We provide a theoretical analysis of Adam under non-stationary stochastic objectives, separating two regimes: Euclidean tracking under adaptive strong monotonicity of the Adam-preconditioned mean-gradient operator, and high-probability projected stationarity guarantees under general $L$-smooth objectives. In the tracking regime, we derive finite-time expected and high-probability bounds that decompose sharply into four components: initialization, objective drift, a first-moment tracking error governed by $\beta_1$, and a preconditioner perturbation governed by $\beta_2$. We characterize the burn-in time required for the transient terms to decay to the asymptotic tracking bound under constant and step-decay schedules. We also prove a high-probability bound on the average projected stationarity gap for Adam under distribution shift. Across both analyses, our bounds reveal a noise--drift tradeoff: in noise-dominated regimes, first-moment averaging and adaptive preconditioning can yield favorable upper guarantees, whereas in drift-dominated regimes, stale first-moment information and preconditioner perturbations can enlarge Adam's tracking guarantee, potentially allowing vanilla SGD to attain a smaller tracking error. Our explicit $(\beta_1,\beta_2,\epsilon)$-dependent bounds identify mechanisms through which adaptive step-sizing can help or hurt under nonstationarity and provide theoretical explanations consistent with Adam's empirical instability and stabilization under distribution shift.

We propose Adam-SHANG, a Lyapunov-guided Adam-type method that couples momentum, adaptive preconditioning, and a curvature-aware correction through a more stable lagged-preconditioner update. For stochastic smooth convex optimization, we prove convergence in expectation under an admissible stepsize condition that can always be satisfied by a conservative spectral bound, without imposing global monotonicity on the second-moment sequence. To obtain a less conservative practical rule, we introduce a computable trace-ratio stepsize, motivated by a local coordinatewise alignment condition. The same structural update is also tested beyond the convex setting with simplified parameters. Experiments validate the predicted stochastic decay and show competitive training performance against Adam and AdamW on deep learning tasks.