cs.CVAug 17, 2026

How Sampling Strategy Affects Imbalance Mitigation in LiDAR Segmentation: A Study of Structured vs. Random Point-Based Architectures

Authors: Antonis Savva, Christos Kyrkou, Theocharis Theocharides

Organizations: KIOS Research and Innovation Center of Excellence · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Cyprus, 1 Panepistimiou Avenue, 2109 Aglantzia, Nicosia

Abstract

Class imbalance in LiDAR point clouds poses challenges for semantic segmentation in autonomous navigation and urban mapping. While 2D vision has numerous mitigation techniques, their effectiveness in 3D remains unclear. We benchmark six reweighting schemes and five imbalance-aware losses across three datasets (DALES, S3DIS, STPLS3D) using two architectures (KPConv, RandLA-Net). Inverse-frequency weighting degrades performance by up to 12% compared to uniform weighting, with catastrophic failures in minority classes. Uniform weighting performs within 2% of complex losses for structured sampling (KPConv) but benefits less for random sampling (RandLA-Net, up to 4.6% gap). Loss landscape analysis reveals a complex interplay: for structured sampling, imbalance ratio determines landscape geometry on real LiDAR data but decouples from it on synthetic data; for random sampling, landscapes show high sensitivity to dataset geometry regardless of imbalance ratio. For the two evaluated point-based architectures, these results suggest that the interaction between sampling strategy (structured vs. random), imbalance severity, and data acquisition characteristics shapes which mitigation approaches are effective.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Jul 23, 2026

Loss Landscape Topology Reveals Why Simple Baselines are Competitive at 3D Point Cloud Segmentation Under Class Imbalance

Semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds faces severe class imbalance, yet the effectiveness of specialized imbalance-aware methods from 2D computer vision remains unclear in 3D contexts. We systematically evaluate 11 imbalance mitigation approaches across datasets with extreme (641:1) and moderate (56:1) imbalance ratios, revealing a surprising finding: standard cross-entropy with uniform weighting achieves competitive performance, typically within 0.8-3.3% mIoU of specialized methods across architectures and datasets. Through multifaceted mechanistic analysis of error patterns, decision boundaries, and the geometry of the optimization landscape, our analyses suggest that imbalance severity shapes the topology, creating narrow solution basins under extreme imbalance and flat plateaus under moderate imbalance. This appears to constrain the effectiveness of loss-level modifications, as all methods must navigate these geometric constraints. Our findings offer practical guidance; standard cross-entropy provides a robust baseline, with specialized methods offering modest improvements (0.8-3.3% mIoU) that vary by architecture and dataset but risk substantial degradation if poorly tuned. This work provides the first mechanistic explanation for why techniques proven effective in 2D do not readily transfer to point-based 3D point cloud segmentation, validated across two representative architectures.
Aug 7, 2026

Rethinking 3D Segmentation from Individual LiDAR Scans: Incidence-Aware Sampling on the SIP Benchmark

3D scene understanding is increasingly important in construction, yet most methods are developed on curated datasets that do not fully reflect real site sensing conditions. In many workflows, individual LiDAR scans provide rapid local updates rather than complete scene representations, producing limited surface coverage, acquisition-driven density variation, and severe imbalance between dominant planar surfaces and sparse construction elements. Because large point clouds must be downsampled, sampling resolution and point allocation directly affect the balance between geometric detail and spatial context. This study evaluates these effects under a fixed per-fragment point budget and introduces an incidence-aware sampling strategy for individual LiDAR scans. The method maps points to a geometry-normalized manifold space for voxel-based selection while preserving original Euclidean coordinates for downstream learning. It requires only point coordinates and normals and no backbone modification. Using the Site in Pieces (SIP) benchmark, experiments with Point Transformer and PointNeXt show improved resolution-averaged segmentation performance, especially for non-planar elements and ladders, while reducing sensitivity to sampling resolution. The results show that acquisition-aware sampling can provide a more stable geometric representation and should be treated as an active component of individual-scan 3D segmentation rather than generic preprocessing.
Mar 1, 2026

Adaptive Augmentation-Aware Latent Learning for Robust LiDAR Semantic Segmentation

Adverse weather conditions significantly degrade the performance of LiDAR point cloud semantic segmentation networks by introducing large distribution shifts. Existing augmentation-based methods attempt to enhance robustness by simulating weather interference during training. However, they struggle to fully exploit the potential of augmentations due to the trade-off between minor and aggressive augmentations. To address this, we propose A3Point, an adaptive augmentation-aware latent learning framework that effectively utilizes a diverse range of augmentations while mitigating the semantic shift, which refers to the change in the semantic meaning caused by augmentations. A3Point consists of two key components: semantic confusion prior (SCP) latent learning, which captures the model's inherent semantic confusion information, and semantic shift region (SSR) localization, which decouples semantic confusion and semantic shift, enabling adaptive optimization strategies for different disturbance levels. Extensive experiments on multiple standard generalized LiDAR segmentation benchmarks under adverse weather demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, setting new state-of-the-art results.