Deep neural networks as lattice gauge theories

Gauge-equivariant graph neural networks generate ordered products of gauge links through local message passing, but the geometry of these internal structures is not captured by the receptive field alone. We investigate the statistical ensemble of closed lattice walks generated by recursive node- and edge-feature operations, independently of network training. Analytical and numerical results reveal a separation between rapid growth of contour length and much slower spatial expansion: deeper compositions generate increasingly long paths through repeated traversal of relatively compact regions. Loop expansions of fermionic observables provide a physical interpretation of this hierarchy, showing how spatial locality remains compatible with high-order dependence on nearby gauge fields. These findings identify complementary roles of network depth in extending spatial reach and enriching the representations constructed within that reach, providing a geometrical perspective on learning lattice gauge observables.

Under mild assumptions, any quantum mechanical (QM) model or quantum field theory (QFT) admits a representation in terms of an ensemble of neural networks with countably many random parameters. We investigate the features of NN-QM and NN-FT models with finitely many parameters, such as a feedforward network of width $N < \infty$. We find that, generically, such models must violate one of the properties of conventional Euclidean QFTs, such as reflection positivity or cluster decomposition. We present several complementary ways of understanding which features can and cannot be preserved at finite $N$, both in QM and in QFT.

One aim of neural network field theory is to put a quantum or effective field theory on a computer, with the network ensemble itself as the theory. We ask how far that aim can be pushed for a function class regular enough to be computed with. Our main result is a no-go theorem with assumptions that hold for standard network architectures. We use it to separate four versions of neural network field theory, according to whether the defining object is the finite width ensemble or its infinite width limit, and whether the target we want to compute is a quantum or an effective field theory. Neither finite width interpretation is straightforwardly consistent. For finite width ensembles with finite variance at each point, the QFT interpretation fails reflection positivity, while the EFT interpretation establishes no scale separation by which the positivity violation can be placed outside its domain of validity. Of the two limit versions, one can be simulated in full and the other only in part, as only its smeared correlators are computable with a controlled error. As such, at the level of a controlled numerical computation, the QFT and EFT versions cannot be distinguished. One dimension escapes the obstruction, yet reflection positivity is shown to still fail there at every finite width for the cosine network. Two escapes from the theorem remain, giving up either finite variance at a point or exact rotation invariance, and we discuss both of these possibilities.