Financial AI systems often train information extractors on one textual register and deploy them across filings, news, and user-generated content, and standard F1 scores do not indicate which predictions remain safe to automate when that input distribution changes. We study confidence estimation and selective prediction for financial named entity recognition (NER) on a three-tier stress test spanning SEC filings, financial news, and general-topic social media as an extreme out-of-domain condition, evaluating a BERT tagger and LoRA-tuned Qwen2.5-0.5B/1.5B models with five inference-time confidence signals, three training seeds, and bootstrap intervals. Confidence rankings themselves change under shift: whole-output probability is the strongest in-domain error detector but deteriorates out of domain, whereas entity-span probability and self-consistency are more robust; self-consistency is also better calibrated without post-hoc fitting. Abstention reduces sentence error from 34.3% to below 2% on the highest-confidence 40% of in-domain inputs and remains useful on financial news, but recovers no usefully large clean subset under the extreme social-media shift. These results motivate a staged deployment strategy that detects severe distribution shift upstream before applying prediction-level confidence gating.
Figures & tables
Split
Domain
Sent.
Ent.
PER
ORG
LOC
Train
FIN (filings) [ 16 ]
1014
980
648
175
157
Valid
FIN (filings) [ 16 ]
150
177
97
68
12
Test
FIN (filings) [ 16 ]
299
295
201
56
38
Test
FiNER-ORD (news) [ 17 ]
300
322
78
151
93
Test
TweetNER7 (tweets) [ 18 ]
300
619
381
135
103
TABLE I: Dataset statistics after harmonization and filtering.
Model
Domain
P
R
F1
Halluc.%
ECE
BERT-base
FIN
66.7 ± 2.3
74.2 ± 1.4
70.3 ± 1.5
–
0.102 ± 0.016
BERT-base
FiNER-ORD
39.1 ± 0.3
37.6 ± 2.3
38.3 ± 1.1
–
0.071 ± 0.017
BERT-base
TweetNER7
35.2 ± 5.2
18.4 ± 1.7
24.1 ± 2.5
–
0.074 ± 0.007
Qwen-0.5B
FIN
40.5 ± 0.4
34.7 ± 2.1
37.4 ± 1.3
3.6 ± 2.4
0.362 ± 0.009
Qwen-0.5B
FiNER-ORD
30.7 ± 1.3
18.0 ± 4.4
22.6 ± 3.8
8.2 ± 0.7
0.407 ± 0.005
Qwen-0.5B
TweetNER7
30.8 ± 0.7
23.7 ± 4.2
26.7 ± 2.8
5.6 ± 1.1
0.370 ± 0.007
TABLE II: Main results (%; mean ± std over 3 seeds; Qwen2.5-1.5B is a single-seed scale check).
Signal
FIN
FiNER-ORD
TweetNER7
AUROC
ECE
AUROC
ECE
AUROC
ECE
Sequence prob.
0.839 ± 0.014
0.512 ± 0.005
0.661 ± 0.015
0.593 ± 0.011
0.626 ± 0.019
0.586 ± 0.006
Token prob.
0.823 ± 0.012
0.531 ± 0.004
0.666 ± 0.019
0.615 ± 0.013
0.605 ± 0.018
0.611 ± 0.006
Span prob.
0.801 ± 0.004
0.362 ± 0.009
0.690 ± 0.030
0.407 ± 0.005
0.721 ± 0.011
0.370 ± 0.007
Type prob.
0.492 ± 0.019
0.506 ± 0.004
0.536 ± 0.022
0.533 ± 0.019
0.511 ± 0.010
0.573 ± 0.002
Self-consistency
0.690 ± 0.019
0.116 ± 0.029
0.671 ± 0.048
0.120 ± 0.015
0.682 ± 0.017
0.100 ± 0.008
TABLE III: Error-detection AUROC and ECE per confidence signal (Qwen2.5-0.5B; mean ± std over 3 seeds), by test domain.
Fig. 1: Self-consistency reliability (0.5B, pooled seeds). The highest-confidence bin inverts under both shifts.
Signal
0.5B (3 seeds)
1.5B (1 seed)
FIN
FiNER
Tweet
FIN
FiNER
Tweet
Sequence prob.
0.839
0.661
0.626
0.764
0.720
0.637
Span prob.
0.801
0.690
0.721
0.819
0.729
0.638
Self-consistency
0.690
0.671
0.682
0.735
0.744
0.663
TABLE IV: Scale check: error-detection AUROC by signal and domain for Qwen2.5-0.5B (3-seed mean) vs. Qwen2.5-1.5B (single seed).
Fig. 2: Sentence-level risk–coverage for Qwen2.5-0.5B (3-seed mean and range; lower is better).
Domain
Signal
P@100%
P@80%
P@60%
FIN
Seq. prob.
40.5 ± 0.4
49.0 ± 0.8
58.4 ± 0.6
FIN
Span prob.
40.5 ± 0.4
49.2 ± 0.3
56.4 ± 0.6
FIN
Self-consistency
40.5 ± 0.4
47.7 ± 0.4
52.8 ± 1.0
FiNER
Seq. prob.
30.7 ± 1.3
34.9 ± 3.0
40.1 ± 1.3
FiNER
Span prob.
30.7 ± 1.3
35.3 ± 1.7
40.8 ± 2.6
FiNER
Self-consist.
30.7 ± 1.3
34.9 ± 3.0
41.4 ± 2.3
TABLE V: Entity-level selective precision (%) at 100/80/60% coverage (Qwen2.5-0.5B; mean ± std over 3 seeds).
Filtered
Relaxed
Sentences dropped (of 2807)
2179
0
Evaluated (cap 300)
300
300
Gold PER/ORG/LOC
619
443
Ignored entities
0
488
Encoder F1
24.1 ± 2.5
19.5 ± 1.0
Encoder MSP AUROC
0.615 ± 0.054
0.650 ± 0.047
TABLE VI: TweetNER7 filtering sensitivity, main (drop-sentence) vs. relaxed (ignore-entity) protocol. Encoder: 3-seed mean; Qwen: seed 42.
Financial named-entity recognition (NER) is essential for translating unstructured financial reports and news into structured knowledge graphs. However, general-purpose large language models (LLMs) often misclassify financial entities or ignore domain-specific patterns. This paper investigates the use of DeepSeek-R1-8B, a recent open-source large language model, combined with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and Noisy Embedding Fine-Tuning (NEFTune) for financial NER. Each annotated sentence in our corpus of 1693 samples is converted into an instruction-input-output triple. We insert lightweight LoRA matrices into the Transformer layers and apply NEFTune to improve generalisation by adding uniform noise to embedding vectors during training. Experiments show that the LoRA-adapted DeepSeek-R1-8B achieves a micro-F1 of 0.901 on seven entity types (Company, Date, Location, Money, Person, Product and Quantity), and adding NEFTune further boosts the micro-F1 to 0.912, outperforming Llama3-8B, Qwen3-8B, Baichuan2-7B, T5 and BERT-Base baselines.
Wu Yuerong, Mingni Luo
University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China · Northeastern University, Seattle, United States
Financial Numerical Entity (FNE) understanding aims to recover the meaning of numerical mentions in financial reports. Existing studies focus on concept name prediction and face two important limitations. First, labels derived from inline XBRL may contain errors because filings are usually prepared manually. Second, other important FNE attributes, such as reporting-time relation, measurement scale, and accounting sign, are less emphasized. We propose NOise-Robust Tagging for Rich Financial Numerical Entity Attributes (NORA) to address these gaps. NORA uses task-aware instance-specific weighting to attenuate the influence of noisy labels during training, and we develop an evaluation protocol that filters noisy labels in real-world test sets. In addition, we construct a large-scale benchmark containing 11.4 million FNEs in 6.3 million sentences with multi-attribute labels and filing metadata. Experiments show that NORA performs strongly compared with previous financial numeric tagging models and noisy-label baselines. Under both unfiltered and noise-filtered test settings, it achieves the best mean Accuracy and Macro F1 over the four attributes, with the largest gain on time-relation prediction, while remaining competitive on concept name, scale, and sign. These results demonstrate the value of modeling rich FNE attributes with document context while accounting for label noise in real-world financial filings.
Sheng-Hua Tsai, Chen-Yang Lai, Yi-Jhen Li +2
National Taiwan University · National Central University
Financial sentiment classifiers are commonly evaluated against human labels, but strong linguistic performance does not necessarily imply economically useful return predictability. This study separates these questions through two experiments. First, we construct a unified three-class benchmark from five financial text datasets and compare TF--IDF Naive Bayes, off-the-shelf FinBERT and Financial-RoBERTa encoders, zero-shot Qwen2.5-7B, and QLoRA-adapted Qwen2.5-7B, LLaMA3-8B, and Mistral-7B models. Mistral-7B achieves the best test accuracy (0.8840) and macro-F1 (0.8771), while QLoRA raises Qwen2.5's macro-F1 from 0.7274 to 0.8615. An inverse-frequency class-weighted loss does not improve Qwen2.5. Second, we evaluate economic validity on a temporally separate 2019 Benzinga sample containing 10,637 unique headlines and 13,115 headline--stock observations for a fixed S&P~100 universe. Model probabilities are converted into continuous sentiment scores, aggregated by stock and signal date, and aligned with next-session returns over one-, two-, three-, and five-day horizons. All seven downstream models produce positive but small mean rank information coefficients at the one-day horizon; the largest is 0.0143 for FinBERT. None of the 28 model--horizon tests remains significant after Newey--West inference and false-discovery-rate correction. Portfolio results likewise fail to establish a robust advantage for the best-performing classifiers. The findings show that QLoRA is effective for financial sentiment adaptation, while also documenting a clear gap between classification accuracy and tradable cross-sectional signals.