Sparse pursuit after dictionary learning can yield a precise atom support even when its physical interpretation is not justified by the calibration data, especially for highly coherent dictionaries where alternative calibration-compatible dictionaries may assign different physical meanings to the same selected support. We develop resolution-aware physical-support inference that jointly accounts for uncertainty in the learned dictionary and in the representation of a deployment signal. Our cross-dictionary confidence correspondence retains calibration-compatible dictionaries and deployment-compatible sparse representations, then projects the surviving explanations onto physical-support space. For local coherent-atom classes with separation scale s, once the deployment data resolve the coherent-block explanation and its atom support, the minimax physical resolution from N calibration signals satisfies δopt(N,s)≍min{s,Ns21}, with relative resolution governed by the orientation-information scale Ns6. Deployment replication improves physical localization only when orientation changes cannot be absorbed by adjusting the active coefficients. For computation, we introduce active endpoint bracketing (AEB), an adaptive finite-bank procedure that evaluates only candidates that can still affect the physical report and otherwise safely coarsens or abstains. Finite-bank experiments, including a four-region synthetic application, show that a point-valued plug-in selector can be physically overprecise, whereas AEB avoids unsupported refinement with fewer candidate evaluations.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Resolution-aware physical-support inference after dictionary learning. (a) illustrates the retain–project–coarsen principle for joint dictionary–support–coefficient explanations. (b) specializes the framework to one supplied coherent block and shows how unresolved deployment and calibration uncertainty limit the attainable physical resolution.
Figure 2: Theory-guided check of the information mechanism on the stored controlled calculation grid. This is a mechanism illustration, not a numerical coverage study for the continuous confidence correspondence.
Figure 3: Four-region physical reports relative to the represented 216-explanation bank. The representative weak-C report shows that AEB preserves the exhaustive same-bank group/ambiguity resolution while the point-valued plug-in gives unsupported fine B localization and definite C absence; the aggregate panel shows both discrepancies in all five eligible completed weak-C profiles. The study uses 15 fresh datasets, one of which has an empty exhaustive finite-bank profile.
Figure 4: Global AEB status relative to exhaustive same-bank evaluation over 18 independent cases and three predeclared profiles per case (54 reporting traces). At each of the six stored query budgets, exact-reference match, safe coarsening, abstention, and unsafe finer-than-reference counts sum to 54; the unsafe count is zero throughout.
Diagnostic
Result
Interpretation
Jeffreys s -exponent
5.9355; central 95% paired-batch MC range [5.9249, 5.9468]
sixth-order scaling; numerical stability
Jeffreys log–log R2
0.99999
stable scaling
Order-14 quadrature exponent
5.9342
independent check
Maximum cross- s affinity spread
0.0243
approximate collapse
Median transition-band spread
0.0167
finite- s drift
Prespecified spread tolerance
0.015
not met
Table S1: Theory-guided numerical diagnostics. Monte Carlo intervals use the 128 paired batches; quadrature and deployment checks are deterministic.
Figure S1: Across-scale orientation-information collapse diagnostic underlying Figure 2 . At each stored ID=Ns6 , the plotted vertical spread is the maximum minus the minimum product affinity across the saved separation scales. Over the prespecified transition budgets ID∈{4,8,16,32,64} , the median spread is 0.0167 , which narrowly exceeds the prespecified tolerance 0.015 . The criterion is therefore recorded as missed and is not used as evidence of numerical coverage for the continuous confidence correspondence.
Figure S2: Coefficient-profiled deployment residual at s=0.1 . Equal coefficients are invariant to numerical precision, whereas nonzero coefficient contrasts follow the closed form in Equation ( 54 ).
e∈argmine′∈Ue′ unqueriedπG(e′;L,U)
Algorithm S1 Active endpoint bracketing on a finite explanation bank
Condition
N
s
νtruth
Bank size
Cases
Low information
4096
0.35
1.20
1025
6
Intermediate information
65536
0.50
0.90
1025
6
High information
131072
0.50
0.80
369
6
Table S2: Global finite-bank evaluation conditions.
Outcome relative to exhaustive same-bank reference
Budget 0.50
Budget 0.75
Non-abstaining (substantive) report
41/54
54/54
Ambiguity conclusion recovered
33/34
34/34
Fine conclusion recovered
0/7
5/7
Unsafe finer-than-reference conclusion
0/54
0/54
Median queried bank fraction
0.209
0.209
Table S3: Global AEB outcomes over 18 independent cases and 54 reporting traces, relative to exhaustive scoring of the same finite candidate bank.
Figure S3: Global AEB recovery at query budgets 0.50 and 0.75 . The 54 reporting traces arise from three predeclared profiles applied to 18 independent cases; the recovery denominators are 34 exhaustive-bank ambiguity traces and seven exhaustive-bank fine traces.
Figure S4: Four-region finite-bank construction used for the application protocol. The library contains 12 atoms arranged into the four physical regions, and the coherence matrix shows the within- and between-region atom similarities that determine the available physical resolution.
Region / phenomenon
Exhaustive finite-bank reference
AEB outcome relative to reference
Point-valued plug-in selector
A: isolated persistent
Fine localization in 11 eligible main profiles
Fine: 10/11
—
B: highly coherent persistent
Group/sector level in five eligible completed weak-C profiles
Group/sector: 5/5
Unsupported fine localization: 5/5
C: weak optional
Support ambiguity in the same five eligible completed weak-C profiles
Support ambiguity: 5/5
False certainty: 5/5
D: represented-scale absence
Absence at the represented scale in 10 eligible main profiles
Absence: 10/10
—
D-present controls
D present in all three eligible controls
False absence: 0/3
—
Table S4: Physical conclusions across 15 fresh datasets in the four-region synthetic application. Every reference conclusion is obtained by exhaustive evaluation of the same finite 216-explanation bank.
Sparse-support uncertainty is usually quantified by treating the dictionary as known, an assumption that can produce overconfident, label-dependent conclusions when the dictionary is learned from latent sparse mixtures. Near collisions of coherent atoms, a test signal may identify the active physical group even though the training data cannot distinguish the physical rays within it. We develop inference for active physical rays, unit atoms modulo sign, after latent dictionary learning. In a fixed-dimensional Gaussian train-test experiment, we retain all dictionaries compatible with a robust training-moment region, profile the test representation over them, and project surviving configurations onto a permutation-invariant support space. The resulting confidence correspondence can report cross-sheet inconclusiveness, group resolution with child ambiguity, or fine-support resolution. We characterize both its statistical cost and decision-theoretic benefit. Residual block orientation first affects the latent training density at cubic order, yielding information of order s6, where s is the within-block collision scale. The correspondence provides high-probability-over-training conditional test coverage, with resolution governed separately by parent detectability, test-time support separation, and learned-dictionary orientation. In the resolved fixed-shell regime, its projective Hausdorff diameter contracts at the minimax-optimal rate s∧(Ns2)−1, up to constants. A restricted-task theorem further determines when coefficient asymmetry allows test replication to supplement training information and when calibration uncertainty remains irreducible. The framework thus yields honest, resolution-adaptive support statements and guides the allocation of training versus test measurements.
Guan-Ju Peng
Institute of Data Science and Information Computing, National Chung Hsing University.
Dictionary learning seeks to recover an unknown dictionary A from observations yi=Axi with sparse coefficient vectors xi. We introduce the Iterative Atom Refinement (IAR) algorithm, a simple procedure for recovering individual dictionary atoms. Starting from a random direction, IAR repeatedly selects the observations most strongly correlated with the current iterate and updates the direction by averaging the selected data. Our main contribution is a rigorous convergence theory of IAR. Using high-dimensional probabilistic estimates and a novel monotonicity principle for atom-selection probabilities, we show that a small initial advantage of one atom is amplified until that atom is isolated. Under our model assumptions, IAR identifies a generating atom after only three refinement steps. Numerical experiments support the theory and show that the resulting dynamics accurately capture the behavior observed in dictionary refinement.
Alexander Christie, Miguel Moscoso, Alexei Novikov +2
Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA · Department of Mathematics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, Madrid 28911, Spain · Department of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA +1
Dictionary learning has long been studied from both optimization and probabilistic perspectives. While formulations with element-wise sparsity regularization (e.g., L1-based sparse coding) admit well-established probabilistic interpretations, many structured variants that impose global constraints lack a clear and tractable generative view. In this paper, we revisit a class of practically effective yet theoretically under-explored dictionary learning methods that impose a simple global regularization on the number of activated dictionary atoms, which we term parsimoniously activated dictionary learning (PADL). We show that PADL admits an equivalent formulation as maximum a posteriori estimation under a structured generative model, with auxiliary latent variables that govern global activation patterns. This formulation allows us to derive generalization guarantees that are difficult to obtain under the original formulation. More importantly, it yields an analytical characterization of the tradeoff between sparsity, storage cost, and reconstruction accuracy, enabling data-driven estimation of optimal hyperparameters. Based on this connection, we develop an efficient and interpretable PADL algorithm that eliminates manual hyperparameter tuning, achieving improved reconstruction performance under comparable sparsity levels on visual benchmarks. We further demonstrate its practical utility in accelerating inference for vision-language models.
Zihui Zhao, Yuanbo Tang, Yang Li
Tsinghua University, Institute of Data and Information Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Ubiquitous Data Enabling