cs.LGAug 21, 2026

C-Score: Beyond Accuracy for Robustness Assessment in Semi-Supervised Learning under Open-World Unlabeled Contamination

Authors: Tsao-Lun Chen, Chi-Cheng Fu, Han-Yi E. Chou, Shun-Feng Su

Organizations: Graduate Institute of Oral Biology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan · NVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA · Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Pseudo-label-based semi-supervised learning has achieved strong performance due to its simplicity and scalability. However, it is typically developed under a closed-world assumption that unlabeled data are drawn from the same distribution as labeled data. In practical deployment, unlabeled data are often collected from open environments and may contain OOD samples. Under such contamination, OOD samples may still receive high-confidence predictions and be incorporated into training as if they were valid target examples. This creates an important evaluation problem: clean in-distribution test accuracy may appear stable even when the internal learning dynamics of SSL have already deteriorated. To address this issue, we study hidden collapse in pseudo-label-based SSL under open-world unlabeled contamination from a diagnostic evaluation perspective. We present C-Score, a compact framework that evaluates training behavior in three complementary spaces: prediction, feature representation, and optimization. C-Score includes PLE and CCI for unlabeled prediction behavior, Sem-Drift for deviation from labeled semantic anchors, and Grad-Align for the compatibility between labeled and unlabeled optimization. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 with multiple OOD sources, varying contamination ratios, and four pseudo-label-based SSL algorithms show that C-Score metrics reveal hidden degradation that clean accuracy alone fails to detect: under SVHN contamination, CCI rises over 280% while best-accuracy remains within 3% of the uncontaminated baseline; near-OOD sources (CIFAR-100, STL-10) cause up to 14.9% accuracy collapse (FlexMatch, r=0.5). The results suggest that clean accuracy alone is insufficient for evaluating SSL robustness in open-world environments, and that internal diagnostic signals are necessary for more reliable robustness assessment under unlabeled contamination.

Explore similar work

Feb 28, 2026

USE: Uncertainty Structure Estimation for Robust Semi-Supervised Learning

In this study, a novel idea, Uncertainty Structure Estimation (USE), a lightweight, algorithm-agnostic procedure that emphasizes the often-overlooked role of unlabeled data quality is introduced for Semi-supervised learning (SSL). SSL has achieved impressive progress, but its reliability in deployment is limited by the quality of the unlabeled pool. In practice, unlabeled data are almost always contaminated by out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, where both near-OOD and far-OOD can negatively affect performance in different ways. We argue that the bottleneck does not lie in algorithmic design, but rather in the absence of principled mechanisms to assess and curate the quality of unlabeled data. The proposed USE trains a proxy model on the labeled set to compute entropy scores for unlabeled samples, and then derives a threshold, via statistical comparison against a reference distribution, that separates informative (structured) from uninformative (structureless) samples. This enables assessment as a preprocessing step, removing uninformative or harmful unlabeled data before SSL training begins. Through extensive experiments on imaging (CIFAR-100) and NLP (Yelp Review) data, it is evident that USE consistently improves accuracy and robustness under varying levels of OOD contamination. Thus, it can be concluded that the proposed approach reframes unlabeled data quality control as a structural assessment problem, and considers it as a necessary component for reliable and efficient SSL in realistic mixed-distribution environments.
Apr 30, 2026

SECOS: Semantic Capture for Rigorous Classification in Open-World Semi-Supervised Learning

In open-world semi-supervised learning (OWSSL), a model learns from labeled data and unlabeled data containing both known and novel classes. In practical OWSSL applications, models are expected to perform rigorous classification by directly selecting the most semantically relevant label from a candidate set for each sample. Existing OWSSL methods fail to achieve this because novel samples are trained without explicit supervision, and these methods lack mechanisms to extract latent semantic information, resulting in predicted labels that have no semantic correspondence to candidate textual labels. To address this, we introduce SEmantic Capture for Open-world Semi-supervised learning (SECOS), which directly predicts textual labels from the candidate set without post-processing, meeting the requirements of practical OWSSL applications. SECOS leverages external knowledge to extract and align semantic representations across modalities for both known and novel classes, providing explicit supervisory signals for training novel classes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that even when existing OWSSL methods are evaluated under the more lenient post-hoc matching setting, SECOS still surpasses them by up to 5.4% without such assistance, highlighting its superior effectiveness. Code is available at https://github.com/ganchi-huanggua/OSSL-Classification.
May 18, 2026

When Accuracy Is Not Enough: Uncertainty Collapse between Noisy Label Learning and Out-of-Distribution Detection

Learning with noisy labels (LNL) is typically benchmarked by closed-set classification accuracy, yet deployment often requires classifiers to reject out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. We present a learner-agnostic ACC-OOD benchmark that freezes LNL checkpoints and evaluates them with standardized near-/far-OOD routing and post-hoc scores across synthetic and real label noise. The benchmark reveals a recurring failure mode: high closed-set accuracy does not ensure OOD reliability, because low-confidence, misclassified in-distribution samples can overlap the score and feature regions occupied by OOD inputs under noisy training. We term this pathology uncertainty collapse. This structural overlap can make high-accuracy LNL methods lose separability at the ID-error/OOD interface under standard OOD scores. As an intervention, we study Virtual Margin Regularization (VMR), a lightweight repair probe demonstrated mainly with PSSCL that synthesizes boundary virtual outliers on trusted ID batches and widens the energy margin. VMR partially reduces the collapse-induced far-OOD failure without replacing the host objective or sacrificing closed-set accuracy in the tested settings. These results support LNL benchmarks that co-report closed-set generalization, open-world reliability, and structural overlap diagnostics.